Karnataka Gulbarga Court October 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Somashekar Vs. Srishail and Another
Court: Karnataka Gulbarga
Decided on: Oct-18-2012
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the order Dtd. 25.9.12 Annexure-M passed by the Court of the I Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Bijapur in O.S. No.178/2006 on I.A. No.37 and allow the same and etc.) 1. Application filed by the petitioner under Section 10 read with Section 11 and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short 'CPC') seeking stay of the proceedings in O.S. No.178/2006 having been dismissed vide order dated 25.09.2012 by the I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Bijapur, petitioner who is the 1st defendant in the suit has filed this petition. 2. Petitioner herein is the 1st defendant in O.S. No.178/2006 filed by the 1st respondent herein seeking a decree for specific performance of the contract dated 06.04.1998 whereunder, the petitioner is stated to have agreed to sell the property in question in favour of the plaintiff/respondent No.1. The suit is filed seeking a direction to defendant No.1 to...
Umla Vs. the State of Karnataka Through Ratkal P.S.
Court: Karnataka Gulbarga
Decided on: Oct-09-2012
(Prayer: This criminal petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. by the Advocate For the petitioner praying to release the accused/petitioner on bail in crime No.23/2012 of Ratkal Police Station, Tq. Chincholi, Dist. Gulbarga In S.C.No.347/2012, which is registered for the offences punishable under Section 302 of IPC and under Sections 25, 27 of Arms Act.) 1. This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. by the advocate for the petitioner praying to release the accused/petitioner on bail in Crime No.23/2012 of Ratkal Police Station, Chincholi - Tq., Gulbarga - District in S.C.No.347/2012, which is registered for the offence punishable under section 302 of Indian Penal Code and under Sections 25 and 27 of Arms Act. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for petitioner as well as the learned High Court Government Pleader. 3. I have perused the statement of objections filed by the learned High Court Government Pleader and the FIR found in the records. 4. The contents of F...
Shabbir and Others Vs. the State of Karnataka Through Manvi Police Sta ...
Court: Karnataka Gulbarga
Decided on: Oct-09-2012
(Prayer: This criminal petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. by the Advocate For the petitioners praying to enlarge the petitioners on bail in crime No.74/2012, registered by Manvi Police, Dist. Raichur, for offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 324, 302 IPC (Now Pending In C.C.No.624/2012 on the file of Civil Judge Junior Division and JMFC Manvi).) 1. This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. by the advocate for the petitioner praying to enlarge the petitioners on bail in Crime No.74/2012, registered by Manvi Police, Raichur Dist., for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 324, 302 of Indian Penal Code. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned High Court Government Pleader for respondent - State. I have perused the FIR found in the records. 3. The contents of FIR discloses that Manvi Police have registered a case in Crime No.74/2012 against accused Nos.1 to 10 for th...
Ravindrakumar Vs. the State of Karnataka and Others
Court: Karnataka Gulbarga
Decided on: Oct-03-2012
Aravind Kumar, J. 1. Plaintiffs in O.S.46/97 before Principal Civil Judge (Jr.Dn), Bidar have filed these writ petitions questioning the Order dated 21.11.2011 passed on I.A.No.XI, Annexure-E in so far as direction issued while allowing I.A.XI filed by the plaintiffs for amendment holding thereunder that said amendment shall not relate back to the date of filing of the suit but it will take effect from the date of filing of the application I.A.XI which was on 24.11.2011 and seeks for quashing of the said portion of the order and petitioner is also seeking for quashing of the Order dated 24.01.2012, Annexure-F directing the Sub-Registrar to furnish the market value of the suit property during 2011 to enable the Trial Court to pass orders on issue No.4. 2. Having heard the Learned Advocates appearing for the petitioners as well as respondents it was ordered to be listed for dictating on 28.09.2012. However, on the said date the matter did not reach and as such it has been listed today fo...
State Bank of India Humnabad Branch, Through Its Manager Humnabad Vs. ...
Court: Karnataka Gulbarga
Decided on: Oct-01-2012
(This regular second appeal is filed under Section 100 of CPC against the judgment and decree dated 15.01.2010 passed in R.A.No.8/2004 on the file of the presiding officer, fast tract court-I at Bidar allowing the appeal and setting aside the judgment and decree dated 23.02.2004 passed in E.P.No.127/1995 on the file of the civil judge (Sr.Dn) at Basavakalyan (camp at Humnabad). This appeal having been heard, reserved for judgment, coming on for pronouncement this day the court delivered the following:) The decree holder has preferred this second appeal questioning the Judgment and Decree passed in R.A.8/2004 dated 15.01.2010 by the Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court-I, Bidar, whereunder order dated 23.02.2004 passed by the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn), Basavakalyan in E.P.127/1995 allowing the execution petition by holding decree holder -bank is entitled to obtain fixed deposit amount for realisation of the decreetal amount came to be reversed and application filed under Order XXI Rule 58 by t...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›