Karnataka Gulbarga Court January 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Laxmibai Vs. Anasuya
Court: Karnataka Gulbarga
Decided on: Jan-30-2012
(Prayer: This CRP is filed under Section 115 of the CPC praying that this Honble Court may be pleased tom set aside the order of Civil Judge (Jr.Dn) At Muddebihal Dated 02.07.2010 passed in O.S. No.167/2008 on preliminary issue and consequently dismiss the suit of the plaintiff by answering preliminary issue, in the affirmative.) 1. It is the defendants revision petition filed challenging the order passed by the trial Court, which held neither the suit is hit under Section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure nor the provisions of the Hindu Succession Act. 2. For the purpose of convenience, the parties are referred to as they are referred to in the original suit. 3. O.S.No.167/2008 is filed by Anusuya W/o. Ningappa aged 45 years, against Laxmibai wife of Ningappa who was aged 60 years, on the date of the suit. The plaintiffs case was that Ningappa married Laxmibai, she was his first wife. As he did not have any children through Laxmibai, he married Anasuya, through her also he had no child...
Maheboobsab Buransab Maniyar and Others Vs. Mohadinsab Maheboobsab Man ...
Court: Karnataka Gulbarga
Decided on: Jan-12-2012
Kumar, J. 1. The appeal is by the plaintiffs against the judgment and decree of the Trial Court, which has dismissed the suit for enforcement of pre-emptive right under Mahomedan Law. 2. For the purpose of convenience, the parties are referenced to as they are referred to in the original suit. 3. The subject matter of the suit is property bearing CTS Nos. 700 and 701 situated at War No.II of Bijapur City, located towards South by property bearing CTS Nos.702 and 704, Ward No.II of Bijapur city. Plaintiffs-1 to 3 are owners of CTS No.702, Ward No.II of Bijapur City. They are in peaceful possession and enjoyment of their respective properties. 4. Defendants-2 and 3 are the owners of the schedule property. Defendant No.1 purchased the schedule property from defendants-2 and 3 under a registered sale deed dated 19.12.1996. The case of the plaintiffs is that defendant No.1 is not the resident of Bijapur city and he is a permanent resident of Babalad village. The plaintiffs disclosed their i...
Maheboobsab Buransab Maniyar and Others Vs. Mohadinsab Maheboobsab Man ...
Court: Karnataka Gulbarga
Decided on: Jan-12-2012
Kumar, J. 1. The appeal is by the plaintiffs against the judgment and decree of the Trial Court, which has dismissed the suit for enforcement of pre-emptive right under Mahomedan Law. 2. For the purpose of convenience, the parties are referenced to as they are referred to in the original suit. 3. The subject matter of the suit is property bearing CTS Nos. 700 and 701 situated at War No.II of Bijapur City, located towards South by property bearing CTS Nos.702 and 704, Ward No.II of Bijapur city. Plaintiffs-1 to 3 are owners of CTS No.702, Ward No.II of Bijapur City. They are in peaceful possession and enjoyment of their respective properties. 4. Defendants-2 and 3 are the owners of the schedule property. Defendant No.1 purchased the schedule property from defendants-2 and 3 under a registered sale deed dated 19.12.1996. The case of the plaintiffs is that defendant No.1 is not the resident of Bijapur city and he is a permanent resident of Babalad village. The plaintiffs disclosed their i...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›