Karnataka Gulbarga Court July 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Md. Aamir Waseem Vs. the State of Karnataka and Others
Court: Karnataka Gulbarga
Decided on: Jul-28-2011
PATIL, J 1. Petitioner in these petitions has sought for a direction, directing the third respondent herein to treat the percentage of the petitioner in the qualifying examination of Physics, Chemistry and Mathematics as 40% by applying the rule of Mathematics with regard to rounding off of numbers, while the petitioner has secured 39.666% in the qualifying examination. Further, he has sought for a direction to third respondent to publish an additional rank list giving ranking to the petitioner for engineering course pursuant to Common Entrance Test-2011 considering the marks obtained by the petitioner, in the common Entrance Test Conducted in 2011, in the interest of justice and equity. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that he has been prosecuting his studies at Farhan Composite Pre-University Arts and Science College at Gulbarga. Through the said college, he appeared for the II year Pre-University Examination, conducted in the month of March 2011 and he has secured the marks out o...
Chanabasappa and Another Vs. the Special Land Acquisition Officer, U.K ...
Court: Karnataka Gulbarga
Decided on: Jul-26-2011
RAMESH, J. 1. The question that requires to be determined in this Revision Petition is as to when the applications under sub-sections (1) and (3) of Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, are maintainable in law? 2. I have heard the Counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order. This Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 24.7.2009 passed by the Court of the II Additional Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Bijapur, (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Reference Court’) in LAC Misc.No. 27/2005. BY the impugned order, the Reference Court has dismissed the petitioner’s application dated 04.06.2005 filed under Section 18(3)(b) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as amended in Karnataka (for short ‘the Act’). The said application was filed to direct the respondent-L.A.O. to refer the matter to the Reference Court as sought by them in their application dated 17.02.2003 filed before the L.A.O. under Section 28A(3) of the Act. 3. The facts leading to...
Kumari Sharmila Vs. the State of Karnataka and Others
Court: Karnataka Gulbarga
Decided on: Jul-19-2011
Patil, J 1. Though this matter is posted in orders list, with the consent of the Learned Counsel appearing for petitioner and Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondents 1 to 4, the same is taken up for final disposal. 2. Petitioner is a student prosecuting here studies in X standard. She has sought for quashing the memorandum endorsement dated 3rd June 2011, bearing No. A7 (N-9)/2011 PaFaPra/26/2011-12, vide Annexure - H. Further, she has sought for a mandamus, directing the second respondent to declare/announce the result of the petitioner in respect of SSLC Examination, taken up by her vide Registration No. 20110208972, conducted in the month of April 2011, by the second respondent/Board. 3. The only grievance of the petitioner in the instant case is that, she was admitted to the fifth respondent/School and she has been prosecuting her studies from I Std to X Std, and as per the examination curriculum issued in the respect of the SSLC Examination for the m...
The Executive Engineer and Another Vs. Sri Zulfegar Ali
Court: Karnataka Gulbarga
Decided on: Jul-14-2011
All the petitions involve similar questions of fact and law. Hence, all the petitions are considered together for common disposal. In W.P.No.1855/2006, the respondent was working in the office of Executive Engineer, KPC WRD Division, Bidar as a watchman on daily wage basis from 03.10.1997 to 1.9.1998. The petitioner was terminated from service orally on 1.9.1998. The Government made reference on 21.11.2002. There was delay of 4 years and 2 months in making reference. The Labour Court passed an award on 17.5.2005 directing reinstatement with continuity of service from 1.9.1998. In W.P.No.9982/2007, the respondent was working as typist in the office of Asst. Director Horticulture, Raichur on daily wage basis during the period 1988-89. He was orally terminated from service on 31.10.1989. The Government made reference. There was delay of 11 years in making reference. The Labour Court passed an award on 29.11.2004 directing reinstatement without continuity of service without back-wages. In ...
Ramesh Desai, Baelgaum and Another Vs. the State of Karnataka by Raich ...
Court: Karnataka Gulbarga
Decided on: Jul-07-2011
(Prayer: This CRL.P is filed u/s. 482 of Cr.P.C. by the advocate for the petitioners praying that this Hon’ble court may be pleased to quash entire criminal proceedings including FIR complaint against the petitioners in Spl.C.C.No.7/2011 (Corr) arising out of Raichur Lokayukta P.S. in Crime No.04/2007 for offences P/U/S.7, 13(1)(d) r/w Sec.13(2) P.C. Act, 1988, pending on the file of the Court of the District and Special Judge (PCA) Raichur at Raichur.) 1. The material facts of the prosecution case disclose that one Arasappa-complainant was working as SDA in the office of Tahsildar at Sindhanoor. There were allegations against him. Petitioner No.1 was the Tahsildar at Sindhanoor for the period in question. The petitioner No.2 was working as FDA in the office of the Tahsildar, Sindhanoor in Establishment Branch. On the report of petitioner No.1, the complainant was deputed to work in Nada kacheri at Jewalagera. The complainant found the posting at Jewalagera is inconvenient. The d...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›