Karnataka Dharwad Court June 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State Bank of Mysore Vs. Venkangouda Tippanagowda Patil and Another
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jun-26-2015
(Prayer: This Appeal is filed under Section 100 r/w Order XLII of the CPC, against the judgment and decree dated 02.07.2010 passed in R.A.No.7/2009 on the file of the Prl. Civil judge, Bagalkot at Bagalkot, dismissing the appeal filed against the judgment dated 03.01.2009 and the decree passed in O.S.No.113/1998 on the file of the Prl. Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) Bagalkot, dismissing the suit filed for recovery of money.) 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree passed by the lower appellate Court in R.A.No.7/2009 dated 02.07.2010. 2. For the sake of convenience, parties are referred to as they are referred to in the suit before the trial Court. 3. Briefly stated the facts are as follows: Plaintiff-Bank had sanctioned commercial loan of Rs.30,000/- to defendant No.1, to run his Video Cassette Library on 16.06.1995 and defendant No.2 stood as guarantor in securing the credit facility from the plaintiff- bank. As per the terms of sanction, defendants have agreed to repay the l...
Abdulla Siddiq and Another Vs. U.F.M. Uday
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jun-26-2015
(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the impugned order dated 02.01.2014 passed on I.A.No.1 filed U/o. VII Rule 11 (D) R/W. Section 151 of the Code of Civil procedure (Annexure-E) passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Karawar in O.S.No.17/2012.) 1. The petitioners/defendants are aggrieved by the order dated 02.01.2014 on IA No.1/2014 made in OS No.17/2012 on the file of the Prl. Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Karwar. 2. The respondent/plaintiff filed O.S.No.17/2012, against the present petitioners who are the defendants, for declaration and possession in respect of the suit schedule property, contending that he is the owner of the suit schedule property. The defendants filed written statement denied the entire plaint averments and sought for dismissal of the suit. 3. When the matter was posted for evidence, the defendants filed an application under Order VII Rule 11 (d) read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Pro...
Abdulla Siddiq S/O. Dr Farooq Vs. u.f.m.uday
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jun-26-2015
:1. : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE26T H DAY OF JUNE, 2015 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE B.VEERAPPA WRIT PETITION No.101539 OF2014[GM-CPC]. BETWEEN:1. ABDULLA SIDDIQ S/O. DR FAROOQ AHMED AGE:49. YEARS, 2. MRS. ALIYAZAHARA W/O.MR ABDULLA SIDDIQ AGE:34. YEARS, R/O. 1019, 25TH MAIN, 4TH T BLOCK, JANANAGAR, BANGALORE-560041. (By Sri. M.B.HIREMATH FOR SRI.SHANTESH AWAJI ADV.) AND: ... PETITIONERS U.F.M.UDAY S/O. SHIVA GAJINKAR AGE:57. YEARS, RAMPUR, MAJALI VILLAGE, KARWAR DIST: KARWAR (By Sri. A S PATIL ADV.FOR C/R) ... RESPONDENT :2. : THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED0201.2014 PASSED ON I.A.NO.1 FILED U/O.VII RULE11(D) R/W.SECTION151OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE (ANNEXURE-E) PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, KARAWAR IN O.S.NO.17/2012. THIS WP COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER The petitioners/defendants are aggrieve...
Prakash S/O Dundappa Aigali, Vs. The State of Karnataka,
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jun-25-2015
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE25H DAY OF JUNE2015BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE G. NARENDAR CRIMINAL PETITION No.100655/2015 C/w. CRIMINAL PETITION No.10866/2013 IN CRL.P.NO.100655/2015: BETWEEN SRI.PRAKASH S/O DUNDAPPA AIGALI AGE46YEARS, OCC: CONTRACTOR R/O: ATHANI, TQ: ATHANI DIST: BELAGAVI (BY SRI.SRINAND A.PACHHAPURE, ADVOCATE) ... PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT BELAGAVI, NOW REP. BY SPP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENCH AT DHARWAD ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI.V.M.BANAKAR, ADDL. SPP) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S482OF CR.P.C. SEEKING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED206.02.2015 PASSED BY THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BELAGAVI IN C.C.NO.02/2012 OFFENCES P/U/S193OF IPC, INSOFAR AS PETITIONER IS CONCERNED. IN CRL.P.NO.10866/2013: BETWEEN SRI.PRAKASH S/O.DUNDAPPA AIGALI AGE:44. YEARS, OCC: CONTRACTOR R/O. ATHANI, TQ: ATHANI DIST: BELGAUM (BY SRI.SRINAND A.PACHHAPURE, ADVOCATE) ... PETITIONER AND ...
Shashikanth and Another Vs. Devaru and Others
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jun-23-2015
1. Aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 9-11-2009 in O.S.No.198 of 2005 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Sirsi in partly decreeing the suit of the plaintiff for declaration etc., the defendants 3 and 8 have filed this appeal. 2. Parties shall be referred to as per their rank in the Trial Court. 3. The case of the plaintiff is that defendants 1 to 3 are the brothers. Defendants 4 to 7 are the sisters of the plaintiff. Defendant 8 is the wife of defendant 3 and they are members of the Hindu undivided family. The suit schedule properties are the joint family properties and therefore, the plaintiff and defendants have a share in that. The plaintiff and defendants 1 to 3 have 9/40th share and defendants 4 to 7 have 1/40th share. The propositus of the family Ganapati Ramayya Hegde died on 18-2-2002 and their mother Gouramma died on 26-1-2003. The plaintiff and defendants 1 to 7 are the only legal heirs. Some of properties have been acquired from out of the income of the joi...
Manjula Vs. Fakkirappa
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jun-22-2015
(Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the impugned Order Annexure-G, dated 20.01.2015, in MA No.36/2014, passed by the learned IIIrd additional Senior Civil Judge, Dharawd, and consequently confirm the Order dated 28.07.2014, passed in O.S.No.364/2011, passed by the 1st Additional Civil Judge, Dharwad as per Annexure-E.) 1. The defendant filed the above writ petition challenging the order dated 20.01.2015 made in M.A.No.36/2014 on the file of III Addl. Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Dharwad allowing the appeal under Order 22 Rule 3 R/w Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure by setting aside the order dated 20.07.2014 made in O.S.No.364/2011 on the file of I Addl. Civil Judge, Dharwad and directed the Trial Court to re-open the case and hold enquiry on I.A. filed under Order 22 Rule 3 r/w Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure and proceed in accordance with law. 2. The brief facts of the case are; That one Basappa S/o. Fak...
Manjula W/O Ningappa Dastikoppa Vs. Fakkirappa S/O Madivalappa Guladko ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jun-22-2015
:1. : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE22d DAY OF JUNE, 2015 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA W.P. NO.102360/2015 (GM/CPC) BETWEEN: MANJULA W/O NINGAPPA DASTIKOPPA AGE:28 YEARS, OCC:HOUSEHOLD AND AGRICULTURE, R/O: METYAL, TQ:BAILHONGAL, DIST:BELGAVI. (BY SRI.: R H ANGADI, ADV.,) AND ... PETITIONER FAKKIRAPPA S/O MADIVALAPPA GULADKOPPA, AGE:49 YEARS, OCC:AGRICULTURE, R/O:MADABHAVI, TQ & DIST: DHARWAD. ... RESPONDENT WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER ANNEXURE-G, DATED2001.2015, IN MA NO.36/2014, PASSED BY THE LEARNED IIIRD ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, DHARAWD, AND CONSEQUENTLY CONFIRM THE ORDER DATED :2. :28. 07.2014, PASSED IN O.S.NO.364/2011, PASSED BY THE1T ADDITIONAL CIVIL PER ANNEXURE-E. JUDGE, DHARWAD AS THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRL. HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER The defendant filed the above writ petition challenging the order dated 20...
Jayanth G. Joshi Vs. The Management of Syndicate Bank
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jun-18-2015
(Prayer: This petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the order dated 06/02/2006 and the award dated 02/02/2007 passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum-Labour Court, Bangalore in C.R.No. 16/02 vide Annex-F and H respectively to the extent the petitioner is aggrieved, since the tribunal has committed errors which are apparent on the face of the records and etc.) 1. The case of the petitioner is that he was appointed as a clerk in the respondent bank on 10/04/1968. In the year 1975, he was promoted as Specialist Assistant. He was transferred to various branches of the respondent-Bank. He was transferred to Chikodi branch by the letter dated 21/01/1997. He remained absent from duties at Akol branch on 29/01/1997. On 15/02/1997, he was relieved in absentia from Akol Branch but he did not report to duty at Chikodi Branch. He was unauthorisedly absent from 29/01/1997 to 33/08/1997. An explanation was called for. Not being sa...
Sanjay Chandusa Gongale Vs. Anjali @ Vidhya and Another
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jun-17-2015
(Prayer: This RPFC is filed under Section 19(4) of the Family Court Act, 1984 against the judgment and order dated 10.6.2004 in Criminal Misc. No. 223/2013 on the file of the Judge, Family Court, Belgaum, partly allowing the petition filed under Section 125 of Cr.P.C.) 1. The petitioner/husband filed the above revision petition against the order dated 10.6.2004 made in Criminal Misc. 223/2013 on the file of the Family Court, Belgaum granting maintenance of Rs.2,500/- to the 1st respondent/wife and Rs.1,000/- to the 2nd respondent/daughter aged about 5 years as on today. 2. It is the case of the respondents that 1st respondent is the legally wedded wife of the petitioner and out of their wedlock 2nd respondent/daughter was born. It is alleged in the petition filed before the Family Court by the respondents that few months after the child was born, the petitioner and their family members started to harass the 1st respondent and abused her in filthy language and the petitioner used to com...
Sanjay Chandusa Gongale Vs. Anjali @ Vidhya W/O. Sanjay Gongale
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jun-17-2015
:1. : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE17H DAY OF JUNE, 2015 R BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA RPFC No.100143/2014 BETWEEN: Shri Sanjay Chandusa Gongale, Age 36 years, Occ: School Rubber Stamp Maker, R/o Mahatma Gandhi Road, Main Road, Old Bagalkot, Dist: Bagalkot. ... PETITIONER (By Sri Girish. A. Yadwad, Advocate) AND:1. Smt. Anjali @ Vidhya W/o Sanjay Gongale, Age:28. years, Occ: Household work, C/o Ambasa S/o Anantsa Kalaburgi, Plot No.45, Sector NO.1, Ramnagar, Nehru Nagar, Belgaum.2. Kumari Vaishnavi D/o Sanjay Gongale, Age 51/2 years, Occ: Happy Nursery School, Student C/o do- (By Smt. Girija S. Hiremath, Advocate) ... RESPONDENTS :2. : This RPFC is filed under Section 19(4) of the Family Court Act, 1984 against the judgment and order dated 10.6.2004 in Criminal Misc. No.223/2013 on the file of the Judge, Family Court, Belgaum, partly allowing the petition filed under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. This RPFC coming on for orders this day, the Court ma...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »