Karnataka Dharwad Court August 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rathnamma Vs. Gurudevi and Others
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Aug-26-2014
Huluvadi G. Ramesh, J 1. These appeals arise out of the judgment and decree passed by the Civil Judge (Sr.Dvn.), Koppal in RA 7/2009 and 16/2009 on 23rd July, 2010. Parties are referred as per their ranking before this Court. 2. Respondents 1-3 filed a suit before the Civil Judge (Jr.Dvn.), Koppal seeking to declare that they are the legal representatives of deceased Devendrapa Jirlbhavi and also have a right to claim the schedule A and B benefits. 3. It appears plaintiffs/respondents 1-3 are the wife and sons of late Devendrappa Jirlbhavi. The said Devendrappa was employed as a Principal in Junior College of Sunakalabidiri, Ranebeenur Taluk and there was pension and gratuity benefits given to him. It is stated, the 1st defendant began to create obstruction and also started troubling the plaintiff in one or the other way, she had led a immoral life with the 1st plaintiffs husband Devendrappa and began posing herself as the wife of Devendrappa and with an intention to knock of the termi...
Smt. Ratnamma W/O Devendrappa Jirlbhavi Vs. Smt. Gurudevi
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Aug-26-2014
R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Dated this the 26th day of August, 2014 Before THE HONBLE MR JUSTICE HULUVADI G RAMESH Regular Second Appeals 5743 c/w 5784 / 2010 Appellant Between Smt Ratnamma, 53 yrs W/o Devendrappa Jirlbhavi R/o Hirekonati Taluk Hirekerur Now r/a Sunakalbidiri Tq Ranebennur, Haveri District (By Sri M C Bandi, Adv.) And 1 2 3 Smt Gurudevi claiming to be W/o Devendrappa Jirlbhavi 52 yrs, R/o Sunakalbidiri Ranebennur, Haveri District Basavarajappa claiming to be S/o Devendrappa Jirlbhavi R/o Sunakalbidiri Ranebennur, Haveri District Shivanand claiming to be *s/o Devendrappa Jirlbhavi, 23 yrs *Corrected vide court order dated 10.9.2014 2 R/o Sunakalbidiri, Ranebennur Haveri District 4 Branch Manager Life Insurance Corporation of India Ranebennur Branch Haveri (By Sri Chandrashekar P Patil, Adv. for R1-3; Sri Narayan V Yaji, Adv. for R4) Respondents Second Appeals are filed under S.100, CPC praying to set aside the judgment dated 23.7.2010 in RA72009 & 16/...
Annasaheb Vs. Suresh
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Aug-25-2014
(Prayer: This Regular Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of CPC against the judgment and decree dated 29.8.2009 passed in R.A.No.56/2007 on the file of VI Addl.District Judge, Belgaum.) 1. This Second Appeal is filed by the appellant-plaintiff against the judgment and decree passed by the learned VI Addl.District Judge, Belgaum, in R.A.No.56/2007, dated 29th August 2009. 2. Plaintiff filed suit in O.S.No.143/2000 for recovery of an amount of Rs.77,658-75 ps. with interest at the rate of 18% and with costs of the suit. By the judgment and decree dated 27th July 2007, the trial Court decreed the suit with costs holding that plaintiff is entitled to recover a sum of Rs.77,658-75 ps. with interest at 6% p.a. from the date of tobacco transaction i.e., 5.4.1998 till realisation of entire suit claim. Against this, defendant-respondent filed R.A.No.56/2007 before the lower Appellate Court. By the impugned judgment and decree, the lower Appellate Court confirmed the recovery of the amount...
Annasaheb S/O Dadu Kamagouda Vs. Suresh S/O Dadu Gouraj
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Aug-25-2014
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Dated this the 25th Day of August, 2014 Before THE HONBLE MR JUSTICE HULUVADI G RAMESH Regular Second Appeal No.5574/2009 Between: Annasaheb S/o Dadu Kamagouda 48 yrs, Agriculture, R/o Kothali, Tal: Chikodi, Dist: Belgaum. ( By Sri N.D.Gunde for Gunday Associates) And: Suresh S/o Dadu Gouraj, 48 yrs, Business R/o Kothali, Tal: Chikode, Dist: Belgaum. ( By Sri Raviraj Patil, Advocate ) .. Appellant .. Respondent This Regular Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of CPC against the judgment and decree dated 29.8.2009 passed in R.A.No.56/2007 on the file of VI Addl.District Judge, Belgaum. This Appeal coming on for final hearing this day, the Court delivered the following:2. JUDGMENT This Second Appeal is filed by the appellant-plaintiff against the judgment and decree passed by the learned VI Addl.District Judge, Belgaum, in R.A.No.56/2007, dated 29th August 2009.2. Plaintiff filed suit in O.S.No.143/2000 for recovery of an amount of Rs...
H. Lalithamma and Another Vs. V. Venkateshulu
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Aug-19-2014
(Prayer: Second 10.2.2010 in RA 134/2008 and RA 133/2008 by the Fast Track Court Appeals are filed under S. 100, CPC praying to set aside the judgment dated II, Bellary Cross Objection is filed under O 41 R 22, CPC praying to set aside the judgment dated 10.2.2010 in RA 134/2008 so far as it relates to ordering refund of consideration amount plus the installments paid to KHB and the interest amount to 2nd respondent, etc.) These two appeals and cross objection arise out of the order passed by the Fast Track Court, Bellary in RA 133/2008 and 134/2008 which arises out of the common order passed by the II Addl. Civil Judge, (Sr.Dvn.), Bellary in OS 97/2005 and 420/2005. Parties are referred to as per the reference made in this appeal as appellants and respondent. Respondent Venkateshulu/plaintiff has filed cross objection 54/2010 in RSA 5244/2010. Two appeals are filed by the appellants who is the agreement holder in respect of the suit property which is said to be a house which was allot...
Vaijayanti W/O Prabhakar Patil Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Aug-19-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE19H DAY OF AUGUST, 2014 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE B.MANOHAR WRIT APPEAL NOs.30966-30967/2012 (ULC) BETWEEN VAIJAYANTI W/O PRABHAKAR PATIL D/O, ARJUN YESHWANT KITTUR @ KITTURKAR, AGED27YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O BHAVANI NAGAR, MANDALI ROAD, BELGAUM-590 001, REPRESENTING THE ESTATE OF SRI YESHWANT KITTUR @ KITTURKAR BEING GRAND DAUGHTER OF Y.R.KITTUR. (BY SRI. SHIVARAJ C BELLAKI, ADVOCATE) AND1 THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY IT SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, M.S.BUILDING, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE. ... APPELLANT22. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, URBAN LAND CEILING, BELGAUM REGION, BELGAUM-590 001. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. C.S PATIL, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE) THESE WRIT APPEALS ARE FILED U/S.4 AND R/W. SEC.10(iv)(a) OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, PRAYING TO, CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN W.P.NO.67162 AND67163OF2009(ULC) AND ON PERUSAL OF THE SAME BE PLEASED TO SET A...
Smt H Lalitamma W/O Veema Reddi Vs. V Venkateshul S/O Late v Mareppa
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Aug-19-2014
R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Dated this the 19th day of August, 2014 Before THE HONBLE MR JUSTICE HULUVADI G RAMESH Regular Second Appeals 5244 / 2010 c/w Cross Objection 54 / 2010 c/w 5249 / 2010 Between In RSA52442010 1 2 Smt H Lalithamma, 40 yrs W/o Vema Reddi Vemareddi, 50 yrs S/o Veerabhadragouda Attender in Engineering College Both are R/o # 131, LIG, KHB Colony Netaji Nagar, Bellary Appellants (By Sri V P Kulkarni, Adv.) And V Venkateshulu, 60 yrs S/o late V Mareppa Ex-Driver of KSRTC & Mine Owner R/o Plot # 4, Veeraanna Gowda Colony Near Bellary Club, Cantonment, Bellary (By Sri B S Kamate, Adv.) Respondent 2 Cross Objector In Cross Objection 54/2010 V Venkateshulu, 60 yrs S/o late V Mareppa Ex-Driver of KSRTC & Mine Owner R/o Plot # 4, Veeraanna Gowda Colony Near Bellary Club, Cantonment Bellary (By Sri B S Kamate, Adv.) And 1 2 Vemareddi, 50 yrs S/o Veerabhadragouda Attender in Engineering College Smt H Lalithamma, 40 yrs W/o Vema Reddi Both are R/o # 131, L...
State Of Karnataka, Represented By Its Commissioner Of Commercial Taxe ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Aug-07-2014
(Prayer: This Strp is filed U/Sec.65 of KVAT Act, 2003 read with section 153(1)(A) of the KVAT Rules, 2005, against the Order dated 04-01-2013 passed in STA No.134/2008 on the file of the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, Bengaluru, allowing the appeal filed under the Provision of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 for the year 2005-06.) 1. This revision petition by the Revenue is filed invoking Section 65 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (for short 'KVAT Act, 2003'), read with Rule 153(1)(a) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 (for short 'KVAT Rules, 2005'), calling in question the order dated 4 t h January 2013 of the Karnataka Appellant Tribunal, Bangalore (for short 'KAT'), allowing S.T.A. No.134 of 2008 filed by the respondent/assessee in respect of the return for the assessment year 2005-06, under the KVAT Act, 2003. 2. Facts briefly stated are: (a) Respondent a registered partnership firm is a registered dealer under the provisions of the KVAT Act, 2003, enga...
State of Karnataka Vs. M/S c.r.gujar
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Aug-07-2014
:1. : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE07t h DAY OF AUGUST2014PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. J USTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY THE HON'BLE MR. J USTICE B.MANOHAR AND SALES TAX REVISION PETITION No.1006 OF2013BETWEEN: STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES VANIJYA THERIGE KARYALAYA, GANDHINAGAR, BANGALORE-09. (BY SRI. C.S PATIL, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE) ... PETITIONER AND: M/S C.R.GUJAR, ASHOK NAGAR, NIPPANI, BELGAUM DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI. PRAMOD S YADAWAD & SRI. H.R KAMBIYAVAR, ADVOCATES) THIS STRP IS FILED U/SEC.65 OF KVAT ACT, 2003 READ WITH SECTION1531)(a) OF THE KVAT RULES, 2005, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED0401-2013 PASSED IN STA No.134/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE KARNATAKA APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU, ALLOWING THE APPEAL FILED UNDER THE PROVISION OF THE :2. : KARNATAKA VALUE ADDED TAX ACT, 2003 FOR THE YEAR200506. This petition coming on for Admission this day, Ram Mohan Reddy, J.made the following: ORDER This revision petition by the R...
Shashavali and Others Vs. State of Karnataka, Deputy Range Forest Offi ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Aug-01-2014
(Prayer: This Criminal Petition Is Filed U/S 482 Of Cr.P.C. Seeking To Quash The Order Dated 13.05.2013 Passed By The Addl. Senior Civil Judge and Jmfc Court, Hospet In Foc No.23/2014-15 Insofar As Imposing Condition No.4 And Order Dated 18.07.2014 Passed By The Iii-Addl. Dist. and Sessions Judge, Bellary, Sitting At Hospet, In Crl.Rp.Nos.5024/2014 To 5039/2014.) 1. The learned Addl. State Public Prosecutor is directed to take notice for the respondent. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the Addl. State Public Prosecutor. Perused the records. 3. The petitioners have sought for relaxation of condition No.4, imposed by the Additional Sr. Civil Judge and JMFC Hospet, in FOC No.23/2014-15, wherein the learned Magistrate has imposed a condition while releasing the vehicle in favour of the petitioner that - "each petitioner shall furnish a nationalized Bank Guarantee for a sum of Rs.10,00,000,/- in favour of the Court and Bank guarantee shall keep alive by periodical renewa...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »