Karnataka Dharwad Court July 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ningappa S/O Kallappa Jiregewade Vs. Shankar
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jul-30-2014
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE04H DAY OF MARCH, 2014 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.866/2002 (PAR) BETWEEN:1. Sri. Ningappa S/o. Kallappa Jiregewade Age:57. years 2. Sri. Jampanna S/o. Kallappa Jiregewade Age:52. years 3. Sir. Erappa S/o. Sri. Kallappa Jiregewade Age:37. years, All are R/o. Navalur village Tq. & Dist. Dharwad. (By Sri. B. V. Somapur, Advocate) AND: APPELLANTS Sri. Shankar Self styled as S/o. Kallappa Jiregewade Age:51. years, Now R/a. Gulbarga Railway outpost Since dead Rep. By his legal representatives 2 1(a) Sri. Satish, S/o. Shankar Jiregewade Occ: Private Service, R/o. Dharwad 1(b) Smt. Sunanda, W/o. Gurunath Vaidye Occ: Household, R/o. Hubli 1(c) Sri. Srinivas, S/o. Shankar Jiregewade Occ: Private Service, R/o. Dharwad 1(d) Sri. Shrikanth, S/o. Satish Jadav Occ: Private Service, R/o. Dharwad 1(e) Smt. Surekha, W/o. Satish Jadav Occ: Private Service, R/o. Hubli 1(f) Smt. Surekha, S/o. Nar...
Moin Basha Kurnooli and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka, Represented ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jul-25-2014
(Prayer: This Criminal Petition is filed Under Section 482 Of Cr.P.C. praying this Hon'ble Court be pleased to set aside the Order Dated 12.04.2010 the stage Registering the Criminal Case and also Order Summoning the petitioner before the court in the instant case for the alleged offence punishable under Section 78(3) of Karnataka Police Act, 1963 in C.C. No. 365/2010 on the file Of II Additional Civil Judge (Jr. Dvn.) and J.M.F.C., Bellary and to Quash the criminal proceedings instituted against the petitioner. This Criminal Petition is filed Under Section 482 Of Cr.P.C. seeking to quash the FIR Dated 30.12.2011 Registered in Cr.No.378/2011 by the cowl bazar police station, bellary and subsequent criminal proceedings in C.C.No.259/2012 on the file of the II-Addl. Civil Judge and Jmfc Court, Bellary, against the petitioner.) 1. All the above said 43 Criminal Petitions are clubbed and taken up together for the purpose of convenience and to avoid repetition of facts and legal implication...
Moin Basha Kurnooli Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jul-25-2014
R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE25h TH DAY OF JULY, 2014 BEFORE: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE K.N. PHANEENDRA CRL. P. No.100319/2014 C/W. CRL. P. No.100326/2014, CRL. P. No.100335/2014, CRL. P. No.100336/2014, CRL. P. No.100353/2014, CRL. P. No.100357/2014, CRL. P. No.100358/2014, CRL. P. No.100377/2014, CRL. P. No.100380/2014, CRL. P. No.100404/2014, CRL. P. No.100405/2014, CRL. P. No.100423/2014, CRL. P. No.100454/2014, CRL. P. No.100480/2014, CRL. P. No.100481/2014, CRL. P. No.100482/2014, CRL. P. No.100483/2014, CRL. P. No.100484/2014, CRL. P. No.100485/2014, CRL. P. No.100500/2014, CRL. P. No.100507/2014, CRL. P. No.100510/2014, CRL. P. No.100511/2014, CRL. P. No.100530/2014, CRL. P. No.100531/2014, CRL. P. No.100532/2014, CRL. P. No.100533/2014, CRL. P. No.100536/2014, CRL. P. No.100567/2014, CRL. P. No.100568/2014, CRL. P. No.100443/2014, CRL. P. No.100444/2014, CRL. P. No.100445/2014, CRL. P. No.100446/2014, CRL. P. No.100447/2014, CRL. P. No.100448/2014...
M/s. Shyamaraju and Company (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Managing Directo ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jul-24-2014
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 r/w 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the order dated 13.8.2013 passed on I.A-3 in O S No. 130/2013 on the file of Addl. Civil Judge and JMFC, Hungund, at Annexure-K.) 1. The petitioner, who is plaintiff in OS No 130/2013 on the file of Civil Judge at Hungund, is before this Court, challenging the order dated 13.8.2013 passed on I.A-III filed in the above said Suit, at Annexure-K. 2. Brief facts of the case leading to the filing of the Writ Petition may be stated as under: The petitioner/plaintiff has filed a suit against the respondents for the following reliefs: (i) to declare that the termination of contract by order dated 26.04.2012 is null and void and not binding on the plaintiff and direct the 3rd defendant to return the amount encashed for mobilization advance bank guarantee and performance guarantees on submission of fresh Bank guarantees; (ii) to issue an order of mandatory injunction directing the def...
The Union Of India, Represented By Its General Manager and Others Vs. ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jul-23-2014
(Prayer: This Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To Quash The Order Dated:31/01/2013 Passed In O.A.No.856/2012 On The File Of The Central Administrative Tribunal Bangalore Bench, Bangalore (Produced Vide Annexure-A) And Etc.,) 1. This writ petition is directed against the order dated 31.01.2013 made in O.A.No.856/2012 on the file of Central Administrative Tribunal at Bangalore. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners/South Western Railways submits that as the respondent has scored below 60%, he was not eligible for empanelment and selection to the post 'Staff and Welfare Inspector Grade-III', but the Central Administrative Tribunal erred in holding that the respondent is entitled for 4 marks and he is entitled for selection to the post of 'Staff and Welfare Inspector Grade- III'. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that there is an error in totaling the marks; and also entitled for awarding marks on account of wrong/ambiguous ques...
Shamanur Shivashankarappa Vs. M/s. India Sugars And Refineries Ltd.
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jul-18-2014
(Prayer: These Criminal Petitions Are Filed U/S 482 Of Cr.P.C. Seeking To Quash The Proceedings In (1) C.C.No.243/2013 (Pcr No.1/2010), (2) C.C.No.244/2013 (Pcr No.2/2010) (3) C.C.No.242/2013 (Pcr No.19/2010) Pending On The File Of The Prl. Civil Judge and Jmfc Court, Hospet, Vide Annexure-A, Against The Petitioner.) 1. The petitioner who is common in Crl.P.Nos.100575, 100576 and 100577 of 2014 has sought for quashing of the entire proceedings in CC No.243/2013 (PCR No.1/2010), CC No.244/2013(PCR No.2/2010) and CC No.242/2013(PCR No.19/2010) respectively on the file of Prl. Civil Judge and JMFC, Hospet, wherein, the petitioner is arrayed as Accused No.4, who is one of the Directors of M/s.Davangere Sugar Company Limited., and Chairman of M/s.Shamanur Sugars Limited. 2. Looking at the array of the petitioner in the above said cases, it is revealed that in Crl.P. No.100575/2014 and Crl.P. No.100576/2014, the petitioner challenges the order of the learned Magistrate in taking cognizance a...
Fakkirawwa Vs. Ashok and Another
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jul-18-2014
(Prayer: These Writ Petitions Are Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To Quash Order Dated 05/02/2013 In O.S.No.94/2011 On I.A.No.6 And 7 Passed By The Court Of The Iii Additional Civil Judge(Junior Division) Dharwad At Dharwad Vide Annexure G And Reject The Applications Vide Annexure C And D Dated 20/06/2012 And Etc.) 1. The trial Court, by the impugned common order dated 5.2.2013, allowed I.As.VI and VII filed under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure by the plaintiff in O S No.94/2011 on the file of III Addl. Civil Judge, at Dharwad. 2. There is no illegality in the impugned order passed on I.A-VI permitting the plaintiff to correct survey number in the Plaint. What is seriously challenged by the petitioner/defendant in this case is the order passed on I.A-7 filed under Order VI Rule 17 of CPC directing the defendants to correct the survey number mentioned in the agreement of sale as 63/A/2 instead of 63/2A. 3. Learned Counsel for the pe...
Smt Rudravva W/O Channabasappa Morab Vs. Smt Suma W/O K Purandarshetty
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jul-17-2014
R.S.A.No.84/2007 1 C/W R.S.A.No.85/2007 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE17h DAY OF JULY2014BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA R.S.A. NO.84/2007 C/W R.S.A. NO.85/2007 R.S.A. NO.84/2007 BETWEEN:1. 2. 3.4.5. SMT RUDRAVVA W/O CHANNABASAPPA MORAB AGED ABOUT76YRS, HOUSEHOLDER R/O MATTI VONI,HUBLI. SMT SAROJA W/O GIRIMALLAPPA MORAB AGED ABOUT47YRS, HOSUEHOLDER R/O MATTI VONI HUBLI SMT BHARATHI W/O CHANDRAKANTH MORAB AGED ABOUT30YRS, HOUSEHOLDER R/O MATTI ONI HUBLI KUMARI ANNAPURNA D/O GIRIMALLAPPA MORAB AGED ABOUT25YRS HOUSEHOLDER R/O MATTI VONI, HUBLI KUMARI VIDYA D/O GIRIMALLAPPA MORAB AGED ABOUT21YRS HOUSEHOLDER R.S.A.No.84/2007 2 C/W R.S.A.No.85/2007 6.7. R/O MATTI VONI, HUBLI KUMARI MEGHA D/O GIRIMALLAPPA MORAB AGED ABOUT21YRS HOUSEHOLDER R/O MATTI VONI, HUBLI KUMAR VINAYKUMAR S/O GURUMALLAPPA MORAB AGED ABOUT21YRS HOUSEHOLDER R/O MATTI VONI, HUBLI. (BY SRI.K.L.PATIL : SMT. S.S.BETURMATH, ADV.,) ... APPELLANTS AND1 2. 3.4. SMT SUMA W/O K PURAND...
Sakshi @ Shweta Vs. Sunil
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jul-09-2014
(Prayer: This MFA filed U/S.19 (1) of the family Courts Act, against the judgement and decree dated: 06.02.2013, passed in matrimonial case no.86/2012 on the file of the judge family court at Belgaum, allowing the petition filed U/S.13 (1) (I-A) of Hindu Marriage Act.) 1. This is an appeal filed under Section 19 (1) of the Family Courts Act directed against the judgment and decree of divorce dated 06.02.2013 made in M.C.No.86/2012 on the file of Family Court at Belgaum. 2. Brief facts of the case leading to the filing of the appeal may be stated as under: The appellant (in short, 'the wife') got married to the respondent (in short, 'the husband') on 10.7.2005. Out of the said wedlock, she has given birth to a male child. On 26.3.2012, the respondent filed a petition under Section 13(1)(i-a) (i-b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, for dissolution of marriage. On 26.3.2012, notice was ordered to be issued to the wife. As per report of the process server dated 20.4.2012, notice sent to the...
Smt. Sakshi @ Shweta W/O Sunil Raikar Vs. Sri. Sunil S/O Dattaram Raik ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jul-09-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE9H DAY OF JULY, 2014 PRESENT THE HONBLE DR. JUSTICE K. BHAKTHAVATSALA AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP D.WAINGANKAR M.F.A.No.22031/2013 (FC) BETWEEN: SMT.SAKSHI @ SHWETA W/O SUNIL RAIKAR, AGE26YEARS, OCC:HOUSEWIFE, D/O SRI SADANAND MANJUNATH VERNEKAR, R/O : RUKMINI NAGAR, 1ST CROSS, NEAR MAL-MARUTI EXTENSION, BELGAUM. APPELLANT (BY SRI.V.M.SHEELVANT, ADV.) AND: SRI SUNIL S/O DATTARAM RAIKAR, AGE:39. YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O : HAIBATTI COLONY, CROSS NO.1, OPP SHIVAJI GARDEN, SHAHAPUR, BELGAUM. (BY SRI.V.P.KULKARNI, ADV.) RESPONDENT THIS MFA FILED U/S.19(1)OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED:06.02.2013, PASSED IN MATRIMONIAL CASE NO.86/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE2JUDGE FAMILY COURT AT BELGAUM, ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED U/S.13 (1) (i-a) OF HINDU MARRIAGE ACT. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, DR.K.BHAKTHAVATSALA J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT This is an appeal filed under Sectio...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »