Karnataka Dharwad Court February 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Siruguppa Recreation and Free Reading Room Vs. the State of Karnat ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Feb-26-2014
(Prayer: This Writ Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, Praying To Direct The Respondents Herein Not To Insist Upon The Petitioner To Secure License For Playing Skill Games Like Chess, Carrom And Rummy And Not To Insist To Comply With Government Order Dated: 12.09.2013, Issued By Respondent No.L (Vide Annexure:B) And May Further Be Pleased To Direct The Respondents To Not To Interfere With The Recreational Activities Carried By The Petitioner's Association.) 1. Petitioner is seeking for a direction to respondents not to insist upon the petitioner to obtain license for playing game of skill like chess, carrom and rummy conducted in the petitioner -- club for these activities. 2. Petitioner's claim to be Recreation Clubs wherein members of the Club are permitted to play games of recreation such as rummy, carrom, chess etc. It is their contention that when no unlawful activity is being carried on in the premises of the Clubs, respondents are insisting...
Anjana and Another Vs. Sanjay @ Chandrakant Ramu Belavi and Others
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Feb-24-2014
(Prayer: Rfa Filed Under Sec. 96 Of Cpc, Against The Judgment And Decree Dtd: 06.02.2013 Passed In F.D.P. N0.01/2010 On The File Of The Civil Judge (Sr.Dn) Hukkeri, Allowing The Petition Filed U/O. 20 Rule 18 R/W Sec. 151 Of Cpc.) (Prayer: Rfa Filed Under Sec. 96 Of Cpc, Against The Judgment And Decree Dtd: 07.02.2013 Passed In F.D.P. No.2/2010 On The File Of The Civil Judge (Sr.Dn) Hukkeri, Allowing The Petition Filed U/O. 20 Rule 18 R/W. Sec. 151 Of Cpc.) (Prayer: Rfa Filed Under Sec. 96 Of Cpc 1908, Against The Judgment And Decree Dtd: 06.02.2013 Passed In F.D.P. No. 1/2010 On The File Of The Civil Judge (Sr.Dn) Hukkeri, Allowing The Petition Filed U/O. 20 Rule 18 R/W. Sec. 151 Of Cpc.) 1. There is a delay in preferring these appeals. As against the very same judgment and decree passed, R.F.A.No.4229/2013 is filed and is admitted. All the parties are before this Court. They have duly executed the compromise petition. They admit the execution of compromise. 2. All these applications ...
Maranna Vs. State Represented by the Deputy Conservator of Forest Offi ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Feb-13-2014
(Prayer: This Criminal Revision Petition Is Filed Under Section 397 And 401 Of Code Of Criminal Procedure, Praying To Set Aside The Order Dated 18/19.12.2013 Passed By The Deputy Conservator Of Forest Officer, Bellary In Foc No. 7/2014-14/2673 And Release The Vehicle Bearing No. Ka-35/A-6729 To The Petitioner By Way Of Interim Custody Of The Vehicle.) 1. This Revision is preferred against the orders passed by the Deputy Conservator of Forest, Bellary in F.O.C. No.7/2013-14/2673 in refusing to release the vehicle of the petitioner bearing its Registration No. KA- 35/A-6729. 2. On perusal of the Karnataka Forest Act, particularly Section 71(B) which reads thus : "71(B).”Issue of show-cause notice before confiscation under Section 71-A.”(1) No order confiscating any timber, sandalwood, charcoal, firewoodGulmavu (Machilus marantha) bark, Dalchini bark, Halmaddi (exudation of Ailanthus malabaricum), canes, ivory, tools, ropes, chains, boats, vehicles or cattle shall be made unde...
Vajravathi, W/O Hirachancl Kutte, and Others Netra, W/O Nagaraj
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Feb-06-2014
(Prayer: This petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the order dated 13.04.2011 passed by the Hon'ble Lok Adalat in O.S.No.28/2010 vide Annexure-D and the final decree dated 23.04.2011 passed in O.S.No.28/2010 vide Annexure-E. 1. This writ petition is filed challenging the award passed by the Lok Adalat on the ground that in the so-called compromise entered into before Lok Adalat, the petitioners have not been allotted any share in the schedule property though each one of them had l/4th share in it. 2. The material on record discloses that one Manikchand Bhadaie and his son Nagaraj Bhadaie constituted a Hindu undivided family. Nagaraj Bhadaie had two daughters. Manikchand Bhadaie also had two daughters. Manikchand Bhadaie and his son Nagaraj Bhadaie are dead. The suit is filed by the widow and children of Nagaraj Bhadaie against the wife of Manikchand Bhadaie and her two daughters for partition and separate possession of their legi...
Shankarbhatt S/0 Mart and Abhatt Pujar, and State of Karnataka and Oth ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Feb-03-2014
This R.F.A is filed under section 96 of cpc against the judgment and decree dated 24.08.2006 passed in o.s. no. 112/2001 on the file of the i addl. senior civil judge at bagalkot, dismissing the suit filed for declaration and permanent injunction and etc. this appeal coming for final hearing on this day, court delivered the following:- 1. This is an appeal filed by the plaintiff of O.S. No. 112/2001 under Section 96 challenging the judgment and decree passed on 24.08.2006 by the learned First Additional Senior Civil Judge, Eadami. Suit of the plaintiffs for the relief of declaration of title and permanent injunction has been dismissed by considered judgment dated 24.08.2006. Respondents herein are the defendant nos.l to 7 in the trial Court. Parties will be referred to as the plaintiff and defendants as per their ranking given in the trial Court. 2. Property over which the main relief of declaration of title has been sought by the plaintiff is an agricultural land measuring 3.08 acres ...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›