Karnataka Dharwad Court January 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shankarappa and Others Vs. the Cooperative Election Commission, Karnat ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jan-31-2014
(Prayer: These writ appeals are filed u/s. 4 of the karnataka high court act, 1961, and rule 27 of the writ proceedings rules. praying to, set-aside the order passed by the learned single judge in w.p.no. 100765-100769/2014 and 100802-804/14 dated 29.01.2014 and allow the writ petition filed by the petitioners granting reliefs claimed therein. 1. These Writ Appeals are filed against the order passed by the learned single Judge dismissing the Writ Petitions and holding that the amendment to Section 28A(4) of the Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959 which came into effect from 11.2.2013 which prescribe the term of office of the members of the committee shall be 5 co-operative yea's is only prospective in nature and it has DO retrospective operation. 2. The appellants are the Board of members of the fourth respondent society. It is registered under the provisions of the Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959 (for short hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). They were declared as e...
Mahadevi and Another Vs. Kenchavva and Others
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jan-31-2014
(Prayer: This Wp Is Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India Praying To Set Aside The Order Dated: 14/08/2009 Vide Annexure-C Passed By The Additional Civil Judge (Jr.Din!.) Gokak In Lok Adalat And Consequential Final Decree Dated:03/10/2009 Vide Annexure-D As A Null And Void.) 1. This writ petition is filed challenging the award passed by the Lok Adalath. 2. The plaintiff”Kenchavva, who is the wife of defendant No.5, filed a suit claiming her l/7th share in the deceased son ”Dundappa's service benefits. She arrayed her daughter-in-law as defendant No.l and grand-children as defendant Nos.2, 3, 4 and 6. Defendant No.7 was the Life Insurance Corporation and defendant No.8 was the Regional Fire Fighter Officer, where the deceased was employed. 3. Her grievance was her son”Dundappa had insured his life for a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/-, Rs.50,000/-, Rs.50,000/- Rs.50,000/- and Rs.50,000/- under different L.I.C. polices. Defendant Nos.1 to 6 colluding with each...
Krishna Sankar Mirjankar Vs. Vasantalata Koivi Vimalanand Mirjankar
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jan-30-2014
(This RFA is filed u/s 96 of cpc against the judgment and decree dt. 15.10.03 passed in o.s.no.39/90 on the file of the civil judge (sr. dn.), sirsi, dismissing the suit for declaration, partition and possession. this appeal coming on for final hearing this day, the court delivered the following:) 1. Plaintiff of an original suit bearing O.S.No.39/1990, which was pending on the file of the Court of Ci/il Judge (Sr.Dn.), Sirsi has approached this Court by filing an appeal under Section 96 of CPC. Respondents herein were defendants in the vsaid suit. Parties will be referred as plaintiffs and defendants 1 to 7 as per their ranking in the trial Court. 2. Plaintiff had filed a suit for the reliefs of declaration to the effect that he has become the owner to an extent of Vo. share in the suit schedule properties, on the basis of settlement deed executed by Mangesh Rao in favour of his paternal grand mother Ganga Bai on 09.08.1939 and for consequential relief of partition and separate posses...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›