Karnataka Dharwad Court October 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Altaf Vs. the State of Karnataka Represented by Public Prosecutor
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Oct-24-2013
(Prayer: This criminal revision petition is filed U/S 397 R/W 401 seeking to set aside the Judgement dated 16.04.2010 passed by the Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court, Sirsi in Criminal A.No.160/06 by confirming the Judgement dated 16.10.2006 passed by the I Addl. JMFC, Sirsi in C.C.No.979/03.) 1. Convicted accused is in appeal against his conviction for the offence punishable under Section 392, I.P.C. and the consequent sentence of imprisonment for one year and fine of Rs.2,000/-. 2. Heard Sri Sadiq Goodwala for the petitioner and learned Addl. SPP, Sri V.M.Banakar for the respondent- State. Perused records. It reveals: a) One Ganga-wife of Parameshwar Bhagwat lodged report at the jurisdictional police station at Sirsi seeking police action alleging that on 9.1.2003 she had accompanied her husband-Parameshwar Bhagwat to go over to Dharwad to attend house-warming ceremony of her relative. At 8.45 p.m. they alighted from the bus at Zoo Circle, Sirsi, to visit their relative's house at ...
Tirakappa Vs. State of Karnataka Represented by State Public Prosecuto ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Oct-11-2013
(Prayer: This Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 374(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to allow the appeal and set aside the judgment and order of conviction dated 16.11.2009 and sentence dated 21.11.2009 passed by Hon'ble Prl. District and Sessions (Spl.) Judge, Bellary in Spl. Case No.25/2003 and the appellant may be acquitted.) 1. Heard the learned counsel for appellant and the learned Special Public Prosecutor. 2. The appellant was the accused before the Court below, against whom allegations of offences punishable under Section 13(1) (e) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as 'the P.C. Act', for brevity) was made. The appellant was a public servant who worked as The Block Development Officer of Huvinahadagali, Bellary district. He had joined service in the year 1968 and as on 29.03.1994 it was alleged that he had acquired assets which were disproportionate to his known sources of income. The check period, ther...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›