Karnataka Dharwad Court April 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shivaram and Another Vs. Hanumanth and Others
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Apr-20-2012
(Prayers: This RFA is filed u/s 100 of CPC praying to set aside the Judgment and decree dated 16/01/2009 passed in O.S.No.63/2005 on the file of the III addl. Civil Judge (SR.DN). Belgaum, and etc. This RFA.CROB is filed u/o.41 Rule 22 of CPC., praying to modify the Judgment and decree dated 16-01-2009 passed in O.S.No.63/2005 on the file of the III addl. Civil Judge (SR.DN) Belgaum, in so far as findings on issue No.2 and addl.issue No.1 and dismiss the suit, and etc.) 1. R.F.A.No.3014/2009 and R.F.A.Cr.Ob.No.101/2010 are by the plaintiff and defendant No.1 respectively in O.S.No.63/2005. R.S.A.No.5148/2009 is by the defendant in O.S.No.178/2010. 2. R.F.As. and Cross-Objections are dealt together, R.S.A. is dealt separately. 3. I.A.I is filed by defendant No.1 under Section 151 of CPC for deletion of names of respondent Nos.2 to 5 in the R.F.A., as defendant No.1 is the sole and absolute owner of the suit schedule property. Opposing the deletion of the names of the respondent Nos.2 to...
Smt. Sundrabai and Others Vs. Deputy Commissioner and Others
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Apr-16-2012
Venugopala Gowda, J1. Petitioners are the wife and children of one Arjuna Nagendrasa Kathare, who purchased the land bearing Sy.Nos.789/16 and 786/6 of Ranebennur Village from Hanumantappa Basappa Basenayakar and Huchchappa Tai Hanumavva Basenayakar, under a registered Sale Deed dated 16.05.1968. Mutation entry in respect of the said property was made in the name of Arjunsa Nagendrasa Kathare on 15.05.1971 vide Annexure-B.2. On 02.06.2007, 3rd respondent filed an appeal, under Section 136(2) of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 (for short ‘the Act”), before the 2nd respondent, challenging the Mutation Entry No.7787 dated 15.05.1971 i.e., after about 35 years. The said appeal was allowed on 18.05.2009 vide order as at Annexure-F petitioners, questioned the said order, by filing a revision petition under Section 136(3) of the Act, before the 1st respondent. The revision petition was dismissed by an order dated 11.11.2010, as at Annexure-C. This writ petition is directed ag...
Abdul Azeem Vs. State of Karnataka by Its Secretary and Others
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Apr-10-2012
(Prayer: The petition is filed under Article 226 and 227 of the constitution of India, praying to quash the Endorsement dated 17.11.2011 issued by the second respondent as per Annexure-J as illegal and void and to direct the respondents to consider the case of petitioner for appointing the petitioner to the post of First Divisional Assistant by passing modified order on the basis of the qualification with all consequential service and monetary benefits flowing there from and the Suitable order.) 1. Petitioner herein is impugning the endorsement dated 17.11.2011 issued by second respondent vide Annexure _J. 2. Brief facts leading to this writ petition are as under: Petitioner herein is son of late Mohammad Ismail Yaligar who was working as Chief Officer of Kamalapur, Taluk: Hospet, Bellary District. It is stated that the petitioners father, Mohammad Ismail Yaligar. Died in harness on 10.02.1994. Immediately thereafter the petitioner as legal representative of deceased Mohammad Ismail Ya...
M.K. Premalata @ Lalita Vs. Gangadhar
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Apr-03-2012
1. The legality and correctness of the judgment and decree passed in M.C. No.50/2007 on 06.01.2010 by the First Additional Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Hubli is called in question in the instant appeal. 2. The respondent filed a petition for grant of decree of divorce to dissolve the marriage solemnised on 08.05.2004 between the parties herein at Gangadhar Nagar, Hubli under Section 13(1) (ia) and (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act on the ground of desertion and cruelty. 3. According to the petition averments, the marriage was solemnised on 08.05.2004. They lived happily at Hubli till 20.12.2004. According to him, the wife is of adamant nature; she used to quarrel with him without any reason and same treatment was extended to his family members; she was not co-operative with him; she always used to use filthy language; she was very-very cruel and rude to him; she is a short-tempered lady; she was insulting him and his parents, and she was also proclaiming that she has no intention to lead marital...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›