Karnataka Dharwad Court March 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
irappa Shivalingappa Pawadi Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Mar-26-2012
1. This criminal petition is filed under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 by the Advocate for the petitioner praying that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to release the petitioner on bail in Crime No.83 of 2010 of Kulagod Police Station, for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 307, 427, 336, 504, 109 read with Section 149 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.2. I have heard the learned Counsel for petitioner as well as learned Counsel for respondent. I have perused the FIR.3. Objection of learned SPP is filed in this case.4. The contents of the FIR found in the record discloses that Kulagod Police Station have registered the case in Crime No.83 of 2010 against the accused 1 to 19 for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 307, 427, 336, 504, 506, 109 read with Section 149 of IPC on the complaint of Shivalingappa Mahabavi. Its contents further discloses that accused belongs to Kuruba Community and the complainant belongs to Lingayath Commun...
Sripada Gouda Vs. State by Karnataka Lokayuktha Police Station, Dharwa ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Mar-22-2012
1. This appeal is by the accused against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence date 12-6-2006 passed by the Principal Sessions and Special Judge, Dharwad in Special (SVC) C.C.No.13 of 1991 convicting the appellant-accused for the offence punishable under Section 13(1)(e) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (for short, the Act of 1988) and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 3 years and to pay fine of Rs.3,89,000/- for the aforesaid offence. 2. The appellant was appointed in Hubli Dharwad Municipality as a Surveyor on 1-7-1966. Later he was promoted as a Junior Engineer and ultimately retired from service on 30-3-1994. 3. According to the case of the prosecution, C.W.1-Y.V. Patil, Police Inspector, Lokayuktha Police Station, Dharwad, by 2-2-1989 received credible information that the appellant-accused has amassed wealth disproportionate to his known source of income by means of corrupt activities. On 2-2-1989, C.W.1 obtained a sea...
John Foscol Lopis Vs. Hubli Electricity Supply Co., Ltd and Others
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Mar-22-2012
(Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to direct the respondents to consider the representation dated 27.5.2009 made by the petitioner, the copy of which has been produced herewith and marked as Annexure-A and appoint the petitioner on compassionate ground to any suitable post in the 1st respondent Corporation and quash the order dated 5/12/2005 passed by the 2nd respondent the copy of which has been produced herewith and marked as Annexure-B.) 1. Petitioner in this petition has sought for a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 27th May 2009 made by the petitioner, the copy of which has been produced herewith and marked as Annexure A and appoint the petitioner on compassionate ground to any suitable post in the first respondent Corporation. Further, petitioner has sought for a writ of certiorari, to quash the order dated 5th December 2005 bearing No.Honnavar:AEE: Samanya:05-06/328...
Kakaral Ravikumar, Koppa and Others Vs. the State of Karnataka, Rep. b ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Mar-22-2012
(Prayer: These Writ Appeals filed u/s 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, praying to call for records and set aside the order dated 17.03.2009, passed by the learned Single Judge, in the Writ Petition No.19684/2007 and etc.,) 1. The appellants are all land owners who have lost their lands or in the process of losing and in fact they are fighting a losing battle to save their lands for livelihood or sustenance due to the compulsory take over of this land by the State Government by issue of notifications u/s 3 (1), (3) and 28 of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 (for short the Act). 2. Appellants/land owners effort to save their lands from the sweep of acquisition by the State Government by filing writ petitions before this Court having failed as the learned Single Judge of this Court opined that there is no merit in the contentions urged in support of the writ petitioners, challenge to the acquisition proceedings under the Act and more so, the number of writ petitioner...
Nagappa Vs. Gangappa
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Mar-09-2012
D.V. Shylendra Kumar, J1.The registry had raised an objection regarding the maintainability of this appeal u/s of the Karnataka High Court Act, pointing out that the order passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No. 66135/2011 on 13.02.2012 and which is made subject matter of the Writ Petition being one passed in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction of the High Court and therefore had sought the clarification from the Counsel as to the maintainability of the appeal.2. In response to such objection, learned counsel for the petitioner-appellant had endorsed that it may be posted before the Court for orders regarding maintainability. Matter had come up for such purpose before the court on 28.02.2012 and this court directed the matter to be listed along with Writ Appeal No. 6371-/2011, on 05.03.2012.3. This writ appeal was listed for disposal on 05.03.2012 along with other appeals. However, as there is no representation this appeal is being listed on 06.03.2012, 07.03.2012 and on 08.03.2...
Basanagouda Vs. the State of Karanataka and Others
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Mar-09-2012
(Prayer: This Writ Appeal Is Filed U/S.4 Of The Karnataka High Courts Act, 1961, Praying To, Set Aside The Order of The Learned Single Judge Passed In Writ Petition No.67432/2011 (LB-RES) Dated: 19/11/2011.) 1. This writ appeal is filed by the appellant who is the petitioner in writ petition No.67432/2011 challenging the order dated 19.11.2011, dismissing his petition. In the writ petition, the petitioner had challenged the order dated 18.10.2011 passed by the Secretary of Panchayat Raj, Rural Development, Panchayat Raj Department, Government of Karnataka in G.O.No.GraPaA 33 GraPanA 2011, Bangalore, by exercising the powers under Sections 48(4) and 48(5) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 (herein after referred as the Act for brevity). The petitioner has been removed from the post of Adhyaksha or Upadhyaksha of Grama Panchayat, Tadakanahalli and also he has been removed from the membership of the Grama Panchayath. 2. The facts leading to the said order is that one Guddappa Gangappa N...
Nagappa Vs. Gangappa
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Mar-09-2012
D.V. Shylendra Kumar, J 1.The registry had raised an objection regarding the maintainability of this appeal u/s of the Karnataka High Court Act, pointing out that the order passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No. 66135/2011 on 13.02.2012 and which is made subject matter of the Writ Petition being one passed in exercise of supervisory jurisdiction of the High Court and therefore had sought the clarification from the Counsel as to the maintainability of the appeal. 2. In response to such objection, learned counsel for the petitioner-appellant had endorsed that it may be posted before the Court for orders regarding maintainability. Matter had come up for such purpose before the court on 28.02.2012 and this court directed the matter to be listed along with Writ Appeal No. 6371-/2011, on 05.03.2012. 3. This writ appeal was listed for disposal on 05.03.2012 along with other appeals. However, as there is no representation this appeal is being listed on 06.03.2012, 07.03.2012 and on 08.0...
Haribhau Siddapa Patil and Others Vs. the State of Karnataka, Rep. by ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Mar-07-2012
(Prayer: Writ Appeal Filed U/S 4 of The Karnataka High Court Act Praying To Set Aside The Order Passed In The Writ Petition No. 4834/2007 Dated 28.09.2007) 1. Appellants are owners of some parcels of lands notified initially u/s 3(1) of the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Act, 1966 (for short the Act) as per notification No. CI 565 SPQ 2006, Bangalore, dated 06.12.2006 (copy at Annexure-A) and published in the Karnataka Gazette dated 08.12.2006 declaring it as an industrial area for the purpose of the Act. Simultaneously, another notification of even date was issued u/s 1 (3) of the Act indicating that the provisions of Chapter 7 of this Act was made applicable and the statutory provisions provided for in this Chapter for acquisition and disposal of land so notified will be put into operation. 2. The third notification also came to be issued simultaneously on the very date u/s 28 (1) of the Act indicating that the very lands are required for the purpose of establishing industries...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›