Skip to content

Karnataka Dharwad Court September 2011 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Sep 15 2011

Smt. Renuka and Others Vs. Smt. Siddavva and Others

Court: Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on: Sep-15-2011

1. The appellants in these appeals are the legal representatives of one Shankar Gouda Patil. The controversy consists of claims for occupancy rights made by late Ramappa S/o. Gurappa Allapura (hereinafter called ‘the tenant’) under Section 48 - A of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) and an application for resumption under S.15 of the Act made by one late Subhash, S/o. Shankar Gouda Patil, in respect of lands bearing R.S.Nos. 50/1 measuring 7 acres 25 guntas, and 26/1A measuring 5 acres 25 guntas, situated at Adaragunchi Village, Hubli Taluk. 2. The material facts to the extent of those not in controversy are the following: The lands in question belonged to Shankar Gouda Patil. The tenant made an application on 30.05.1974 in Form No. 7 seeking registration of occupancy rights by stating that he has been cultivating the lands as a tenant for the past 18 - 20 years. After notice to the landlord, the Land Tribunal by an order 19.0...


Sep 07 2011

M/S. V.S. Lad and Sons and Others Vs. Sociedade De Fomento Industrial ...

Court: Karnataka Dharwad

Decided on: Sep-07-2011

Reported in: 2012(3)KCCR1986

(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the order dated 18.04.2011 on I.A.No.4 passed in O.S.No.89/2007 on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge at Kudligi vide Annexure-A.) 1. The defendants in O.S.No.89/2007 have filed this writ petition challenging the order dated 18.04.2011 passed by the learned Senior Civil Jude, Kudligi, allowing I.A.No.4 filed by the plaintiff-respondent herein seeking amendment of the plaint. 2. The respondent has filed the suit seeking a decree of specific performance of the agreement dated 12.07.2004 for supply of the short delivered quantity of iron ore fines of certain specifications. In the suit, the plaintiff has contended that the agreement inter alia provided for supply of three lakh tones of iron ore fines per year having certain identified specifications. The plaintiff contended that it was agreed between the parties that three lakh tones of iron ore fines per year would be su...


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial