Karnataka Dharwad Court June 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Spic Southern Petrochemicals Industries Corporation Ltd. Vs. M/S A.K. ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jun-21-2011
GOVINDARAJUL, J 1. The subject place for consideration is in regard to interpretation of amendment of Negotiable Instrument Act 1881, by Act 55 of 2002, on the aspect of limitation. 2. The appeal is coming on for admission, both the sides have submitted the arguments on merits. So, case is taken up for final disposal. 3. The complainant in C.C. No. 537/2005 on the file of the Civil Judge (Junior Division) and JMFC is the appellant in this appeal. 4. The parties will be referred according to their ranking before JMFC. FACTS OF THE CASE:- 5. The facts necessary for the consideration of the appeal are as under: The case of the complainant is that it is a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. The company is engaged in the business of production and sale of fertilizer and pesticides. 5(a). It is the further case of the complainant that complainant has a branch at Bellary among other branches, in India. The accused has transacted with the complainant for the p...
Smt. Durugamma and Others Vs. Shivashankara and Others
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jun-16-2011
(Prayer: This MFA is filed under Section 173 of MV Act, against the judgment and award dated, 24.03.2007 passed in MVC No. 157/2005 on the file of the Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.), Member, MACT-VI, Kudligi, dismissing the claim petition for compensation. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree, dated 24.3.2007 passed by the Court of the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.) Member, MACT-VI in M.V.C.No. 157/2005. 2. The facts of the case in brief are that on the fateful day of 28.3.2005, one Durugamma was knocked down by a lorry. She died on the spot. The appellant Nos. 1 and 2 claiming to be the daughter and grandson respectively of the deceased filed the claim petition. 3. The Tribunal dismissed the claim petition on the ground that the appellants have failed to establish that they are the legal representatives of the deceased Durugamma. 4. Sri Ravi Hosamani, the learned counsel for the appellants submits that the police documents drawn at the time of preparing the spot mahazar contain ref...
The New India Assurance Company Limited Vs. Mini Badtol Dias and Other ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jun-03-2011
1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and award dated 19.10.2005 passed by the Court of the I Addl. M.A.C.T., Karwar in M.V.C. No. 191/2003. The deceased Anklar @ Anand was knocked down by a bus, when he was on his way back from the work-place to his residence. For his death in the road traffic accident in question, the Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs. 2,33,000/-, the break-up of which is as follows- Sl.No.ParticularsAmount (Rs.)1Loss of dependency2,08,000/-2Loss of love and affection 20,000/-3Funeral expenses 5,000/- Total2,33,000/-2. The Insurance Company is in appeal before me. Sri V.R. Datar, the learned counsel for the appellant submits that the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 are the brothers of the deceased. As they were not dependent on the deceased, they are not entitled to be awarded any amount towards the loss of dependency and in any case, their entitlement could be only towards the loss of estate. In support of his submissions, he has relied on this...
Parvati Guddapaur @ Tanvasi Vs. State of Karnataka, Department of Rura ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jun-03-2011
(Prayer: This writ petition is filed praying to quash the order/notice dated 11.05.2011 issued by the 5th respondent produced as per Annexure - A as illegal and etc.,) 1. As the questions of facts and law involved in these petitions are similar, they are clubbed, heard together and are being disposed off by this common order. 2. The petitioners are all Anganawadi Workers. The petitioner in W.P. No. 63085/2011 and 63086/2011 are elected as the members of the Taluk Panchayath and the petitioner in W.P. No. 63087/2011 is elected as the member of the Grama Panchayath. They have called into question the orders issued by the Officers of the Department of Women and Child Department. The impugned orders require the petitioners to put in their resignation either for the post of Anganawadi Workers or for the membership of the local body. 3. Sri Rajashekhar Burji, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are doing voluntary service, that they are not holding any ...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›