Karnataka Dharwad Court November 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Veerayya Vs. G.K. Madivalar
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Nov-30-2011
V. Jagannathan, J: 1. This Criminal Revision Petition is by the accused, who has been convicted by the Trial Court for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and the said judgment and the consequent sentence of fine of Rs.2,00,000/- imposed being confirmed by the lower appellate Court by dismissing the petitioner’s appeal. 2. The facts of the case in short are that, the respondent filed a complaint alleging an offence under Section 138 of the N.I.Act on the footing that the petitioner herein had borrowed a loan of Rs.2,00,000/- from the complainant and towards the discharge of the said loan amount, the petitioner had issued a cheque for Rs.2,00,000/- and the said cheque dated 22.8.2005, on presentation, was returned with the endorsement insufficient funds. After issuing notice to the petitioner and receiving no response, the complainant approached the Trial Court by way of a private complainant under Section 200 of the Cr.P.C. 3. Before the Trial Court, e...
Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Jineshwar Malleable and Alloys
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Nov-11-2011
(Prayer: This appeal is filed under Section 35(G) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 arising out of order dated 01.12.2006 passed in final order 2001/2006 in appeal No.523/2004, praying that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to: formulate the substantial questions of law stated therein: set aside the final order No.2001/2006 dated 01/12/2006 passed by the cestat, Bangalore in Appeal No.523/2004; and restore the Order-in-appeal No.53/2004 CE dated 23-02-2004 passed by the commissioner (Appeals), Mangalore.) 1. This appeal is filed by the revenue being aggrieved by the order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Bangalore (hereinafter called the ‘CESTAT’) in Appeal No. Excise/523/2004 dated 1-12-2006 wherein the appeal filed by the assessee has been allowed with consequential benefits. 2. The material facts of the case leading up to this appeal are as follows: The assessee filed an application for refund of Rs.80,161/- on 17-5...
Dr. Shivayogeppa B. Hinchigeri Vs. the Chancellor Karnataka University ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Nov-04-2011
(Prayer: This WP Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the order/notification dated:18/10/2010, passed by the first respondent, produced at Annexure-E to this Writ Petition.) 1. This writ petition raises a short, but important question regarding the appointment of a Vice-Chancellor of a University under the provisions of the Karnataka Universities Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’, for the sake of brevity). The petitioner has assailed the notification dated 18.10.2010 issued by the first respondent-Chancellor produced at Annexure-E and has sought consequential directions. 2. The petitioner is stated to be an eminent academician having obtained M.Sc., in Bio-Chemistry in first class and Ph.D., from Simon Fraser University, Canada. He is said to be the senior most professor in the 4th respondent-Karnatak University(hereinafter, referred to as ‘the University’) established under Section 3 of the Act. The achiev...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›