Karnataka Dharwad Court October 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Halappa Bharama Gavanale and Another Vs. the State of Karnataka, Repre ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Oct-20-2011
Suri Appa Rao, J 1. This appeal is filed under section 374 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the Judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 8th July, 2011 in S.C. No. 6/2011 on the file of the Fast Track Court-I, Chikodi, whereby the appellants who are accused Nos.1 and 2 have been convicted for the offence under Section 302 r/w section 34 of I.P.C., sentencing them to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs. 5,000/- each, in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for five months. 2. The relevant facts leading to filing of this appeal are as follows: The 1st appellant - Halappa Bharama Gavanale is the father of 2nd Appellant - Rama Halappa Gavanale. The family of the deceased No.1 Kallappa owned a land in Hulloli, but he shifted his family to Umarani about 6 years back. The accused and the deceased owned sheep and the accused were grazing their sheep in the land of Thabagouda Shivagouda Patil - PW-9. The accused were ...
Shivaji Vittal Rao Chauhan Vs. Bahubali Devagouda Naslapuare
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Oct-12-2011
(Prayer: This Criminal Revision Petition is filed under Section 397 R/w 3-1 Cr.P.C. by the advocate for the petitioner praying to set aside the judgment and order dated 22.12.2009 passed by the learned IV Additional. District and S.J., Belgaum in Crl.A.No.204/07 and etc.) 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent regarding maintainability of the application. 2. The present petitioner had earlier approached this Court by way of Criminal Revision Petition No.2084/2010. The same was dismissed on merits by an order of this Court dated 18.8.2010. The same was carried by way of a Special Leave Petition before the Apex Court. The Apex Court has disposed of the Special Leave Petition, as withdrawn in Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.561/2011 dated 31.1.2011 in the following terms. “The Special Leave Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. It is needless to observe that the petitioner is entitled to avail such remedy as may be available to him ...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›