Jharkhand Court January 2018 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bharat Kansari Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-15-2018
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (D.B) No. 237 of 2017 with I.A No.1192 of 2017 (Against the Judgment of conviction dated 16.03.2013 and Order of sentence dated 19.03.2013, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-I, Gumla, in S.T No.289 of 2009.) Bharat Kansari ... Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Respondent -------- CORAM : THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B. B. MANGALMURTI ------ For the Appellant : Mr. Md. Zaid Ahmed For the State : A.P.P. ------ By Court:- Though this case is listed for consideration of the interlocutory application filed by the appellant for bail, but upon going through the record, we find that the entire appeal can be disposed of at this stage itself, which is being done accordingly.2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the State.3. The appellant is aggrieved by the Judgment of conviction dated 16.03.2013 and Order of sentence dated 19.03.2013, passed by the learned Add...
Ms Hindalco Industries Limited Through Its President Mines Shri Bijesh ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-12-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 7286 of 2017 --- M/s Hindalco Industries Limited .... ...... Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand & Ors. .... ...... Respondents --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR --- For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Ganguly, Sr. Adv. Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Adv. Mr. Ashish Prasad, Adv. Ms. Mukta Dutta, Adv. Mr. Vijay Kant Dubey, Adv. For the Respondent-State : Mr. Ajit Kumar, A.G. Mr. H.K. Mehta, A.A.G. Mr. Atanu Banerjee, G.A. Mr. Chanchal Jain, JC to A.G. Ms. Aprajita Bhardwaj, J.C to A.G. --- 05/12.01.2018 I.A. No. 231 of 2018 A strange application has been filed. Seeking exemption from filing compliance report in terms of order dated 04.01.2018 passed in W.P.(C) No. 7286 of 2017, the respondents have filed this application.2. The learned Advocate-General submits that under the High Court Rules period of limitation for filing appeal against an order passed by the Single Judge of this Court is 30 days and an appeal vide L.P.A. No. 10...
Ms Hindalco Industries Limited Through President Mines Shri Bijesh Kum ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-12-2018
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 7318 of 2017 M/s Hindalco Industries Limited ... ... Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand and others ... ... Respondents with W.P.(C) No. 7319 of 2017 M/s Hindalco Industries Limited ... ... Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand and others ... ... Respondents with W.P.(C) No. 7320 of 2017 M/s Hindalco Industries Limited ... ... Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand and others ... ... Respondents with W.P.(C) No. 7321 of 2017 M/s Hindalco Industries Limited ... ... Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand and others ... ... Respondents with W.P.(C) No. 7322 of 2017 M/s Hindalco Industries Limited ... ... Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand and others ... ... Respondents with W.P.(C) No. 7323 of 2017 M/s Hindalco Industries Limited ... ... Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand and others ... ... Respondents with W.P.(C) No. 7324 of 2017 M/s Hindalco Industr...
Diwakar Mahato Vs. Chhutu Ram Mahato and Ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-11-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 719 of 2006 .. Diwakar Mahato ... Petitioner -V e r s u s- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Chhutu Ram Mahato 3. Ruitu Mahto 4. Majhila Mahato 5. Gurucharan Mahato 6. Bishnu Charan Mahato ...Opp. Parties CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Petitioner : - None For the Opp. Parties :- None. 04/11.01.2018 No one appears for the petitioner or the opposite parties.2. We have perused the impugned judgment and materials available on record. This revision petition is preferred against the judgment of acquittal dated 08th August, 2006 passed in Sessions Trial No. 20 of 2004, by the court of Learned Sessions Judge, Seraikela-Kharsawan, whereunder accused/opposite parties have been acquitted of the charges for the offence under Section 436 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code.3. As per the case of the complainant, the incident is of 27.05.1998 in the evening when on return from the local ...
Nawin Sahu ? Nagendra Sahu Vs. State of Bihar
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-11-2018
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Appeal (D.B.) No. 90 of 1993 (R) (Against the Judgment of conviction and Order of sentence dated 17th of February, 1993, passed by the Judicial Commissioner, Ranchi, holding Circuit Court at Lohardaga, in Sessions Trial No. 8 of 1992). ------------- Nawin Sahu @ Nagendra Prasad Sahu .. Appellant Versus The State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) .. Respondent -------- For the Appellant : Mr. Ashish Verma, Advocate. For the Respondent-State : Mr. Ram Prakash Singh, A.P.P. -------- PRESENT : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH PRASAD DEO ------- By Court.:- Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the State.2. The appellant is aggrieved by the Judgment of conviction and Order of sentence dated 17th of February, 1993, passed by the learned Judicial Commissioner, Ranchi, holding Circuit Court at Lohardaga, in Sessions Trial No. 8 of 1992, whereby, the sole accused has been found guilty and convicte...
Deep Shikha Kumari Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-11-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No.3758 of 2011 Deep Shikha Kumari, Daughter of Ravindra Narayan Upadhay, Resident of Village West Bokaro Ghato Tand, Quarters No.C-16, P.O. Ghato, P.S. Mandu & District Ramgarh. .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary of Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi, P.O. Project Bhawan, P.S. Jagarnathpur & District- Ranchi, Jharkhand.2. The Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi, P.O. Project Bhawan, P.S. Jagarnathpur & District-Ranchi, Jharkhand.3. Mrs. Aradhana Patnayak, I.A.S., Mission Director, National Rural Health Mission Committee, Namkum, Ranchi, Jharkhand.4. The Deputy Commissioner, Dumka, P.O. & P.S. & Sub-Divisional & District Dumka.5. Civil Surgeon, Dumka P.O.& P.S. & Sub-Divisional & District Dumka. ....... Respondents --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Sarju Prasad, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. An...
Tata Steel Limited Through Its Chief Legal and Compliance Mrs Meena La ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2018
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 2176 of 2015 With W.P. (C) No. 2184 of 2015 With W.P. (C) No. 2185 of 2015 In W.P. (C) No. 2176 of 2015) & (In W.P. (C) No. 2184 of 2015 Tata Steel Limited. Petitioner Versus 1. Union of India, Through the Secretary, Ministry of Coal, New Delhi.2. The Secretary, Ministry of Mines, Government of India, New Delhi.3. The State of Jharkhand, Through the Chief Secretary, Ranchi.4. The Secretary, Department of Mines & Geology, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi.5. Assistant Mining Officer, Ramgarh.6. District Mining Officer, Ramgarh. Respondents In W.P. (C) No. 2185 of 2015 Tata Steel Limited. Petitioner Versus 1. Union of India, Through the Secretary, Ministry of Coal, New Delhi.2. The Secretary, Ministry of Mines, Government of India, New Delhi.3. The State of Jharkhand, Through the Chief Secretary, Ranchi.4. The Secretary, Department of Mines & Geology, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi.5. Assistant Mining Officer, Dhanbad.6. Distri...
Islam Mian Vs. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2018
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 3300 of 2007 Islam Mian, son of Late Chaman Mian, resident of East Katras Coliery, Akash Kinaru Colliery, P.S. Katras, District Dhanbad. ....... Petitioner Versus 1. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. through its Chairman cum Managing Director, Having its office at Koyala Bhawan, Koyala Nagar, Dhanbad.2. The General Manager, Sijua Area No.V, Moonidih, Bharat Coking Coal Limited, District-Dhanbad. 3.Director (Personnel) Koyala Bhawan, At, P.O. & District Dhanbad. 4.Deputy Chief Personnel Manager, East Katras Colliery of Bharat Coking Coal Limited, District-Dhanbad. 5.The Project Officer, East Katras Colliery of Bharat Coking Coal Limited, P.O-Kusunda, District-Dhanbad. .... Respondents --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Mrinal Kanti Roy, Adv. For the Respondents : Mr. Anoop Kumar Mehta, Adv. . CAV on 31/10/2017 Pronounced on 10/01/2018 Per Pramath Patnaik, J.In the accompanied writ application, the p...
Trilok Singh Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M. P. No. 1341 of 2015 .. Trilok Singh ... Petitioner -V e r s u s- 1. The State of Jharkhand.2. Bhupinder Singh ...Opp. Parties CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Petitioner : - M/s Indrajeet Sinha & Arpan Mishra, Advs. For the Opp. Parties :- Mr. Vikash Kishore, Adv. . 02/10.01.2018 The instant petition seeking leave to appeal against the judgment of acquittal dated 18.02.2015 rendered by the Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur in Complaint Case No. 96/2007 whereunder the sole accused/opposite party no. 2 has been acquitted of the charges under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code is suffering from a delay of 69 days. However, we have heard learned counsel for the petitioner at length on the grounds of challenge and gone through the materials on record and also perused the impugned judgment. Briefly stated the prosecution case lodged by the complainant being Sakchi P. S. Case...
Parwati Nag Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2018
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. W.P. (S) No. 3703 of 2008 Parwati Nag D/o late Ram Krit Srivastava, W/o Durga Charan Nag, resident of D/92, Bagun Nagar, Cron Road No. 1, P.O. Baridih, P.S. Sidgora, District East Singhbhum Petitioner -V e r s u s- 1.The State of Jharkhand. 2.Director General of Police, Jharkhand, Ranchi, P.O., P.S. & District- Ranchi (Jharkhand). 3.D.I.G. Personal, Jharkhand Region, P.O., P.S. & District-Ranchi (Jharkhand). 4.S.P., East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur, P.O. & P.S. Jamshedpur, District-Singhbhum East (Jharkhand). Respondents CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK. For the Petitioner : - Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sinha, Sr. Advocate. For the Respondent-State: - Mr. Rakesh Kumar Shahi, J.C. to A.A.G. C.A.V. On: - 14.11.2017 Delivered On: - 10/01/2018 Per Pramath Patnaik, J.In the accompanied writ application, the petitioner has, inter alia, prayed for direction upon the respondents to appoint her on the post of the Police Constable in pursuance to th...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »