Jharkhand Court September 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Irfan Ansari Alias Md Irfan Ansari and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-20-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5611 of 2017 Arman Mansuri, S/o Md. Asique, R/o VillageSukurhutu, PO&PSKanke, DistrictRanchi . Petitioner versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party with B.A. No. 5568 of 2017 Raja Ram Mahto, son of Sibu Mahto, resident of Sukurhuttu, PO&PSKanke, DistrictRanchi . Petitioner versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party with B.A. No. 5613 of 2017 Suhail Mansuri, son of Jahir Mansoori, resident of village Sukurhutu, POSukurhutu, PSKanke, Jharkhand . Petitioner versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party with B.A. No. 5628 of 2017 Samnoor Mansoori @ Sabnoor Mansoori, son of Abdul Wahab Mansoori, resident of villageSukurhuttu, PO&PSKanke, DistrictRanchi . Petitioner versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party with B.A. No. 5681 of 2017 1. Rahul Mansuri @ Rahul Mansoori, S/o Rahees Mansuri 2. Minhaz Hussain, S/o Sajib Mansuri 3. Irshad Mansuri @ Irshad Mansoori, S/o Kudus Mansuri. All R/o villageSukur...
Bhuneshwar Singh and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 956 of 2017 1. Bhuneshwar Singh 2. Binay Prasad 3. Dinanath Pathak .. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH --------- For the Petitioners : Mr. A.K. Kashyap, Sr. Advocate. For the State : Mrs. Sadhna Kumar, A.P.P. --------- Reserved on :11. 09/2017 Pronounced on :19. 09/2017 Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. Three petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Sadar (Chatra) P.S. Case No. 94 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No. 441 of 2012, registered under Sections 406, 409 / 120B of the I.P.C., lodged on the basis of one written statement given by Lalit Ram, Project Economist of District Rural Development Agency, Chatra. It appears that inquiry Committee has submitted that work performed by Welfare point with respect to 184 projects (cluster) constituted of 702 plans out of the 414 plans have been examin...
Harjeet Singh Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through Cbi
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.1152 of 2017 Rahul Kumar Shankarka Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand through the C.B.I. Opposite Party ----- With A.B.A. No. 1480 of 2017 Arun Kumar Singh ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand through the C.B.I. ....Opposite Party With A.B.A No. 1591 of 2017 Harjeet Singh ...Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand through the C.B.I. ... Opposite Party With A.B.A No. 3017 of 2017 Akash Agarwal ...Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand through the C.B.I. ...Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH ----- For the Petitioner :M/s A.K. Chaturvedy, Indrajit Sinha, Vikash Kumar Advocates For the CBI : Mr. K.P. Deo, S.C. ----- C.A.V. on 11.09.2017 Delivered on 19/09/2017 Anant Bijay Singh, J.Since all the anticipatory bail applications arose from the same RC Case No. 05(A)/2015-R, they are being heard together and disposed of by this common order.2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connecti...
Rahul Kumar Shankarka Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through Cbi
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.1152 of 2017 Rahul Kumar Shankarka Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand through the C.B.I. Opposite Party ----- With A.B.A. No. 1480 of 2017 Arun Kumar Singh ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand through the C.B.I. ....Opposite Party With A.B.A No. 1591 of 2017 Harjeet Singh ...Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand through the C.B.I. ... Opposite Party With A.B.A No. 3017 of 2017 Akash Agarwal ...Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand through the C.B.I. ...Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH ----- For the Petitioner :M/s A.K. Chaturvedy, Indrajit Sinha, Vikash Kumar Advocates For the CBI : Mr. K.P. Deo, S.C. ----- C.A.V. on 11.09.2017 Delivered on 19/09/2017 Anant Bijay Singh, J.Since all the anticipatory bail applications arose from the same RC Case No. 05(A)/2015-R, they are being heard together and disposed of by this common order.2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connecti...
Rakesh Kumar Vs. Personnel and Adminis Reform
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 1116 of 2017 Rakesh Kumar .. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel & Administrative Reforms, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 3. Jharkhand Public Service Commission, through its Secretary, Ranchi 4. Jharkhand Public Service Commission, through its Chairman, Ranchi 5. The Examination Controller, Jharkhand Public Service Commission, Ranchi .. Respondents ------ CORAM HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner: M/s A.K.Das, Puja Kumari, Kumari Shikha For the J.P.S.C: Mr. Sanjay Piprawall For the State: Mr. Shyam Narsaria, J.C to G.A-IV ----- 09/19.09.2017 The present writ petition has been filed for a direction upon the respondent-Jharkhand Public Service Commission for constituting a committee of subject matter experts for correct determination of the answer of the question Nos. 14, 64 & 94 of Code D of General Studies-I and question Nos. 16, 21 & 92 of Code D o...
Gulam Mohammad Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Acquittal Appeal No.25 of 2015 With I.A Nos. 6908 of 2017 & 8474 of 2016 Gulam Mohammad @ Gulam Mamehyd ... Appellant / Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Md. Mumtaz 3. Tashlima Khatoon ... Respondents/Opp.Parties -------- CORAM : THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN ------ For the Appellant : M/s.Vijay Kumar Roy, Advocate. For the Opp.Parties. : M/s. Sudhansu Kumar Deo, Advocate. ------ 9/19.09.2017 Heard learned counsel for the informant appellant and learned counsel for the State.2. This acquittal appeal is directed against the Judgment dated 15.4.2015, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Giridih, in S.T No.263 of 2010, whereby, the private respondents, who are the husband and the mother-in-law of the deceased, and who had faced the trial for the offences under Sections 498-A, 302, 306 / 34 of the Indian Penal Code, have been acquitted after trial.3. I.A No.6908 of 2017 has been ...
Akash Agarwal Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through Cbi
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.1152 of 2017 Rahul Kumar Shankarka Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand through the C.B.I. Opposite Party ----- With A.B.A. No. 1480 of 2017 Arun Kumar Singh ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand through the C.B.I. ....Opposite Party With A.B.A No. 1591 of 2017 Harjeet Singh ...Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand through the C.B.I. ... Opposite Party With A.B.A No. 3017 of 2017 Akash Agarwal ...Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand through the C.B.I. ...Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH ----- For the Petitioner :M/s A.K. Chaturvedy, Indrajit Sinha, Vikash Kumar Advocates For the CBI : Mr. K.P. Deo, S.C. ----- C.A.V. on 11.09.2017 Delivered on 19/09/2017 Anant Bijay Singh, J.Since all the anticipatory bail applications arose from the same RC Case No. 05(A)/2015-R, they are being heard together and disposed of by this common order.2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connecti...
Arun Kumar Singh Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through the C B I
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-19-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.1152 of 2017 Rahul Kumar Shankarka Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand through the C.B.I. Opposite Party ----- With A.B.A. No. 1480 of 2017 Arun Kumar Singh ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand through the C.B.I. ....Opposite Party With A.B.A No. 1591 of 2017 Harjeet Singh ...Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand through the C.B.I. ... Opposite Party With A.B.A No. 3017 of 2017 Akash Agarwal ...Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand through the C.B.I. ...Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH ----- For the Petitioner :M/s A.K. Chaturvedy, Indrajit Sinha, Vikash Kumar Advocates For the CBI : Mr. K.P. Deo, S.C. ----- C.A.V. on 11.09.2017 Delivered on 19/09/2017 Anant Bijay Singh, J.Since all the anticipatory bail applications arose from the same RC Case No. 05(A)/2015-R, they are being heard together and disposed of by this common order.2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connecti...
Satya Narayan Mahato Vs. Smt Ambika Mahato
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-18-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI First Appeal No. 146 of 2016 .... Satya Narayan Mahato . . . Appellant Versus Smt. Ambika Mahato . . . Respondent .... CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B. B. MANGALMURTI For the Appellant : Mr. Satish Kumar Ughal, Advocate Mr. Tapas Kabiraj, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. A.K.Chaturvedi, Advocate Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh, Advocate C.A.V ON:11.09.2017 PRONOUNCED ON :18. 09.2017 B.B.Mangalmurti, J.This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 19.07.2016 and the decree following thereupon sealed and signed on 28.07.2016 passed by Shri Bal Mukund Roy, Principal Judge Family Court, Seraikella-Kharsawan in Matrimonial Suit No. 29 of 2010 whereby the suit filed by the appellant/petitioner under Section 13(1)(i) (i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act was dismissed.2. The relevant facts of the case in brief are that the appellant Satya Narayan Mahato being husband of respondent Ambika Mahato filed a suit under Section 13(1)...
Pitru Munda Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-16-2017
1 Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 946 of 2006 Against the judgment of conviction dated 06.05.2006 and order of sentence dated 09.05.2006 passed by Sri Nishat Haider, Additional Judicial Commissioner III, Khunti in Sessions Trial No. 365/2005. Pitru Munda ... Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Respondent For the Appellant : Mr. Anil Kumar Ganjhu, Advocate For the State : Mr. Satish Kr. Keshri, A.P.P. P R E S E N T HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH HONBLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S.N. PATHAK Per Anant Bijay Singh, J This appeal has been heard by this Division Bench specially constituted on 16.09.2017 (Saturday).2. This appeal has been preferred by the the sole appellant Pitru Munda, being aggrieved and dissatisfied by the judgment of conviction dated 06.05.2006 and order of sentence dated 09.06.2006 passed in Sessions Trial No. 365 of 2005 by Sri Nishat Haider, learned Additional Judicial Commi...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »