Jharkhand Court August 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rayan Xavier Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-28-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.448 of 2017 Rayan Xavier Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Rohan Kumar Opposite Parties with A.B.A. No.1110 of 2017 1. Dipankar Sengupta 2. B.N.Singh @ V.N.Singh 3. N.S. Kadiyan 4. Ranjit Dharn @ Ranjit Dhar Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & Anr. Opposite Parties ----- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. Chandrajit Mukherjee, Advocate For the State : APP For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Mahesh Tiwary, A.K.Dubey, Advocate ----- C.A.V. on 22.08.2017 Delivered on 28/08/2017 Since both the anticipatory bail applications arose from the same Complaint Case being C/1 1095 of 2015 pending in the court of J.M.,1st Class, Jamshedpur, they are being heard together and disposed of by this common order. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the complainant and learned APP. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with C/1 1095 of 2015, the case ...
S Kartikaye and Anr Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-28-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.4166 of 2016 1. Satyanand Mohan Raju 2. Shivram Mohan Raju @ Shiv Ram Mohan Raju Petitioners Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Arun Kumar Thakur Opposite Parties with A.B.A. No.3245 of 2016 1. S. Kartikaye 2. Shivjee Sharma Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party ----- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH ----- For the Petitioners : M/s Indrajit Sinha & Lukesh Kumar, For the State : A.P.P For the Informant : Mr. Arbind Kumar, Advocate ----- 09/Dated:28. 08/2017 Since both the anticipatory bail applications arose from same F.I.R being Parsudih (Sundernagar) P.S. Case no.341/2015 registered under sections 420/465/467/468/503/504/120(B)/406/34 I.P.C. they are being heard together and disposed of by this common order.2. The prosecution case, in short, is that the Complainant- Arun Kumar Thakur is one of the partners of M/s Anand Home Makers, which is registered firm, having two partners, of its office at 75, Riv...
Satyanand Mohan Raju and Anr Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-28-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.4166 of 2016 1. Satyanand Mohan Raju 2. Shivram Mohan Raju @ Shiv Ram Mohan Raju Petitioners Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Arun Kumar Thakur Opposite Parties with A.B.A. No.3245 of 2016 1. S. Kartikaye 2. Shivjee Sharma Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party ----- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH ----- For the Petitioners : M/s Indrajit Sinha & Lukesh Kumar, For the State : A.P.P For the Informant : Mr. Arbind Kumar, Advocate ----- 09/Dated:28. 08/2017 Since both the anticipatory bail applications arose from same F.I.R being Parsudih (Sundernagar) P.S. Case no.341/2015 registered under sections 420/465/467/468/503/504/120(B)/406/34 I.P.C. they are being heard together and disposed of by this common order.2. The prosecution case, in short, is that the Complainant- Arun Kumar Thakur is one of the partners of M/s Anand Home Makers, which is registered firm, having two partners, of its office at 75, Riv...
Jitendra Kumar Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through Its Chief Secretary ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-28-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (PIL) No. 3118 of 2014 --- Jitendra Kumar --- ---- Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through its Chief Secretary 2. The Energy Secretary, Jharkhand 3. The State of Bihar through its Chief Secretary 4. The Managing Director, Bihar State Hydro Electric Power Corporation 5. Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Limited --- --- Respondents --- CORAM:The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh The Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.B. Mangalmurti For the Petitioner: Mr. Abhijeet Kr. Singh, Advocate For the Resp Nos. 1&2: Mr. Jai Prakash, A.A.G, Rishi Pallava, JC to A.A.G. For the Resp Nos. 3: Mr. Binit Chandra, JC to GA, Bihar For the Resp No. 4: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Resp No. 5: M/s Navin Kumar, Amit Sinha, Advocates --- 23/ 28.08.2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Petitioner approached this Court seeking a direction upon the Respondent State of Jharkhand to take urgent step for commissioning of Tenu-Bokaro Link Canal Mini Hydel Power ...
Union of India Through the General Manager South Eastern Railway and O ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-28-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 4624 of 2016 --- Ajay Kumar Rai --- ---- Petitioner Versus 1. The Ministry of Railways through the Secretary, Railway Board 2. The General Manager, South Eastern Railway, Kolkata 3. The Chief Personnel Officer, South Eastern Railway, Kolkata 4. The Principal Chief Engineer, South Eastern Railway, Kolkata 5. The Deputy Chief Personnel Officer (Gaz), South Eastern Railway, Kolkata 6. The Divisional Railway Manager, South Eastern Railway, Ranchi 7. The Divisional Railway Manager (P), South Eastern Railway, Hatia 8. Mr. Anil Kumar Puran, Assistant Engineer (Construction), South Eastern Railway, Chaibasa, West Singhbhum -- --- Respondents --- with W.P. (S) No. 6047 of 2016 --- 1. Union of India through the General Manager, South Eastern Railway, Kolkata 2. Railway Board (Ministry of Railway) through the Secretary, Railway Board 3. Chief Personnel Officer, South Eastern Railway, Kolkata 4. Principal Chief Engineer, South Eastern Railway, ...
Abdul Majid Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-28-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 1320 of 2009 Abdul Majid .. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Ramgarh 3. Vijay Kumar Gupta .. Respondents ----- CORAM HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner: Mr. Kalyan Roy For the State: Mr. Ashok Kumar Thakur, J.C to S.C(L&C) For the Respondent No.3: Mr. V. Shivnath, Sr. Adv. ----- 26/28.08.2017 The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 01.02.2002 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Ramgarh (respondent No.2) in Doubtful Zamabandi Case No. 16/2001-02 (Annexure-5 to the writ petition) whereby, the Zamabandi opened in the name of the petitioner has been cancelled and the Zamabandi opened in favour of Raghaw Prasad Gupta has been restored.2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the materials placed on record.3. The factual background of the case, as appears from the writ petition, is that the ancestors of the petitioner had acq...
Banapidi Bunkar Sahyog Samitte Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-28-2017
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (PIL) No. 120 of 2012 .. Banapidi Bunkar Sahyog Samittee through its Chairman Enamul Haque, Ranchi ... Petitioner -V e r s u s- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Secretary, Co-operative Department, Government of Jharkhand 3. The Registrar Co-operative Societies, JHLCOLAMP, Ranchi 4. The CEO, Chottangpur Regional Handloom Weaver's Co-operative Union Ltd., Irba, Apollo Hospital Campurs, Ranchi 5. Chottangpur Regional Handloom Weaver's Co-operative Union Ltd., Irba, Ranchi 6. The Director, Abdul Razzaque Weaver's Apollo Hospital, Irba, Ranchi 7. The Principal Secretary, Department of Industry, Government of Jharkhand 8. The Union of India 9. The Secretary, Department of Handloom 10. The Director, Central Bureau of Investigation, New Delhi 11. The Central Bureau of Investigation 12. The Chairman-cum-Managing Direcor, ICICI LOMBARD, Mumbai 13. The Director (Investigation), Income Tax Department, Ranchi 14. The Additional Director (Investigat...
Lovelesh Kumar Jha Vs. Rural Dev Dept
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-28-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 3774 of 2017 Lovelesh Kumar Jha, S/o Mahesh Prasad Jha, R/o Bhallu, Sukhari, Godda. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through Secretary, Rural Development Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi 2. The Chief Executive Officer-cum-Special Secretary, Rural Development Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi 3. The Project Manager-cum-Technical Expert, Water Shed Cell cum Data Centre, District Rural Development Agency, Godda, Godda 4. The Project Manager-cum-Forest Divisional Officer, Water Shed Cell-cum- Date Centre, Godda, Godda, Jharkhand. . ... .. Respondents ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S. N. PATHAK ----- For Petitioner : Mr. Prempujari Roy, Advocate For Respondents : Nilam Tiwary, JC to SC-I --- 04/ 28.08.2017 The petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer for payment of arrears of salary for the work rendered by him on the post of Agriculture and Livelihood Expert, which has fallen due from April 2014 to...
Central Coalfields Ltd. Th G.M Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-28-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.3511 of 2006 ----- Central Coalfields Limited through Ramadarsh Sah, the General Manager (Land & Revenue), Central Coalfields Limited, Darbhanga House, Ranchi, Post N.C.D.C., Police Station Sadar, District Ranchi. . Petitioner. -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand.2. The Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh.3. The Distgrict Land Acquisition Officer, Hazaribagh.4. Sri Tikeshwar Mahto.5. Sri Karinath Mahto.6. Sri Ram Lakhan Mahto.7. Sri Janta Mahto. All sons of Late Mohan Mahto.8. Sri Wakil Mahto.9. Sri Tulshi Mahto. Both sons of Rushu Mahto. 10.Mahesh Mahto, son of Late Chamtu Mahto. 11.Sri Sohrai Mahto. 12.Sri Surendra Mahto Both sons of Ram Lal Mahto. 13.Sri Bhakur Mahto. 14.Sri Thakur Mahto. Both sons of Banshi Mahto. 15.Sri Ghanenath Mahto. 16.Sri Sainath Mahto. Both sons of Late Bandhu Mahto. 17.Sri Ram Dayal Mahto, son of Ramdhan Mahto. 18.Suresh Mahto, son of Late Budhan Mahto. 19.Sri Keshar Mahto. 20.Sri Charak Mahto. 21.Sri Dinesar M...
Ajay Kumar Rai Vs. The Ministry of Railways Through the Secretary Rail ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-28-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 4624 of 2016 --- Ajay Kumar Rai --- ---- Petitioner Versus 1. The Ministry of Railways through the Secretary, Railway Board 2. The General Manager, South Eastern Railway, Kolkata 3. The Chief Personnel Officer, South Eastern Railway, Kolkata 4. The Principal Chief Engineer, South Eastern Railway, Kolkata 5. The Deputy Chief Personnel Officer (Gaz), South Eastern Railway, Kolkata 6. The Divisional Railway Manager, South Eastern Railway, Ranchi 7. The Divisional Railway Manager (P), South Eastern Railway, Hatia 8. Mr. Anil Kumar Puran, Assistant Engineer (Construction), South Eastern Railway, Chaibasa, West Singhbhum -- --- Respondents --- with W.P. (S) No. 6047 of 2016 --- 1. Union of India through the General Manager, South Eastern Railway, Kolkata 2. Railway Board (Ministry of Railway) through the Secretary, Railway Board 3. Chief Personnel Officer, South Eastern Railway, Kolkata 4. Principal Chief Engineer, South Eastern Railway, ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »