Jharkhand Court August 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Baldeo Prasad Jaiswal and Ors Vs. Bharat Refractories and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 4078 of 2008 ------- 1.Baldeo Prasad Jaiswal, son of late Sundar Prasad Jaiswal. 2.Uma Kant Singh, son of Late Dhiro Prasad Singh 3.Hari Lal, son of Late Manik Chand, All are resident of village Marar, P.O-Marar, P.S. Ramgarh, District: Hazaribagh. ... Petitioners Versus 1.Bharat Refractories Limited, through Chairman-cum-Managing Director, a government of India Undertaking having its Head Office at Indira Gandi Margh, Sector IV, B.S. City, P.S. B.S. City, District Bokaro. 2.Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Bharat Refractories Limited, Indira Gandhi Margh, Sector IV, B.S. City, P.S. B.S. City, Distrit Bokaro. 3.General Manager, Bharat Refractories Limited, Ranchi Road Refractories Plant, Marar, P.O Marar, P.S. Ramgarh, District Hazaribagh. 4.General Manager, Bharat Refractories Limited, IFICO Refractories Plant, Marar, P.O Marar, P.S. Ramgarh, District Hazaribagh. 5.General Manager, (D&A), Bharat Refractories Limited, Indira Gan...
Sukhdeo Mahto and Anr. Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 6036 of 2007 ------- 1.Sukhdeo Mahto, son of late Veru Mahto, resident of village Titichapuri, P.O and P.S Govindpur, District Dhanbad. 2.Falatun Ansari, son of late Babulal Mian, resident of village Asanbani, P.O Bhitiya, P.S. Govindpur, District Dhanbad. ... Petitioners Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.The Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi. 3.The Director, Secondary & Audlt Education, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi. 4.The Additional Director, Director, Secondary & Adult Education, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi. 5.The Regional Deputy Director of Education, North Chotanagpur Divison, Hazaribagh. 6.The District Superintendent of Education, Dhanbad. Respondents ------ CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Saurav Arun, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Kaustav Ra...
Madhua Bidinli ? Madhu Sudhan Bidinli Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2017
-1- Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 1793 of 2004 ---- [Against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 02.07.2004 and 03.07.2007 respectively passed by the Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-II, Chaibasa in Sessions Trial No. 78 of 2004] --- Madhua Bidiuli @ Madhusudan Bidiali ... Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Respondent ---- For the Appellant : Mr. Navneet Sahay, Advocate For the Respondent : Mrs. Vandana Bharti, A.P.P. --- PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.B. MANGALMURTI --- By Court: Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. The sole appellant stands convicted for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life by the impugned judgment dated 02.07.2004/03.07.2004 passed in Sessions Trial No. 78 of 2004 by the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-II, Chaibasa.3. The prosecution story as made out on the basis of t...
Rakesh Kumar Dubey and Ors Vs. Personnel and Adminis Reform
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 6640 of 2016 .. 1. Rakesh Kumar Dubey 2. Mahesh Kumar 3. Jitendra Kumar Sharma 4. Nawal Kishore Tirkey 5. Prakash Minz 6. Ashish Kumar Kak 7. Sunil Kumar 8. Ashutosh Oraon . Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Principal Secretary, Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasa Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi, officiating from Project Bhawan, Post Dhurwa, Police Station Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi; 3. The Principal Secretary, Industry, Mines and Geology Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi, officiating from Project Bhawan, Post Dhurwa, Police Station Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi; 4. The Mines Commissioner, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi, officiating from Mines Directorate, Doranda, Ranchi, Post Doranda, Police Station Doranda, District Ranchi; 5. The Director of Mines, Industry, Mines and Geology Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ra...
Shiv Sharan Yadav Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.- 3455 of 2007 Shiv Sharan Yadav Son of late Mukund Yadav, resident of village Dengalpara, Dumka (Hatia Road) PS- Dumka (T), District- Dumka Petitioner -V e r s u s- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Commissioner, Santhal Paragana Division, Dumka 3. Deputy Commissioner, Dumka 4. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Dumka 5. Birendra Kumar Singh, son of late Rajkumar Singh, resident of Dangalpara (Hatia Road), Dumka, PS- Dumka Town, Sub- Division and District- Dumka 6. 16 Annas Raiyat of Mouza Dumka Town No. 7, PS- Dumka Town, Sub-Division and District- Dumka . Respondents CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR For the Petitioner : - Mr. Rajeeva Sharma, Sr. Advocate For the Respondent-State :- Mr. Amit Kumar Verma, JC to SC (L&C) Order No.-07 Dated:30. 08.2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 10.04.2007 passed in R.M.A No. 11 of 2006-07 whereby the Commissioner, ...
Kali Pada Mondal Alias Kali Pada Mandal Vs. Steel Authority of India L ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.4753 of 2017 ------ Kali Pada Mondal @ Kali Pada Mandal .... .... . Petitioner Versus 1. Steel Authority of India Limited through its Chairman 2. General Manager of Steel Authority India Limited, Dhanbad 3. Assistant General Manager, Steel Authority of India Limited, Dhanbad.4. Manager (Personnel), the Indian Iron & Steel Company Limited, Dhanbad. .... .... .... Respondents ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.B. MANGALMURTI For the Petitioner : Mr. Suraj Singh, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Vijay Kant Dubey, Advocate. Mr. Kaustav Panda, Advocate. 02/29.08.2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 3rd July, 2017 passed in O.A./051/00046/2016 by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench at Ranchi whereby though the O.A. has been partly allowed upon quashing of the letter dated 21st May, 2013 i.e. the notice of his retirement holdin...
Chitranjan Dey Alias Chitta Ranjan De and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkha ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 900 of 2017 with Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 901 of 2017 ------ 1. Swapan Kumar Dey @ Sapan Kumar Dey Appellant in Cr.Appeal (DB) No. 900 of 2017 2. Chitranjan Dey @ Chitta Ranjan De, 3. Suman Kumar Dey @ Suman Kumar De, 4. Anpurna Devi @ Anna Punna De 5. Radha Rani @ Radhi Rani De Appellants in Cr.Appeal (DB) No. 901 of 2017) Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Respondents (in both appeals) ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.B. MANGALMURTI For the Appellants : Mr. Shri Krishna Murari, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Mishra, A.P.P. 05/29.08.2017 Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned A.P.P. on behalf of the State.2. Appellant in Criminal Appeal (DB)No.900 of 2017 is the husband of the deceased while appellants in Criminal Appeal (DB)No.901 of 2017 are the father-in-law, brother-in-law, mother-in-law and step mother-in-law of the deceased lady Re...
Rajesh Kumar Singh Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through Cbi
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B. A. No. 2026 of 2017 Rajesh Kumar Singh Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand through C.B.I Opposite Party with A.B. A. No. 2763 of 2017 Ajeet Kumar Singh Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand through C.B.I Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH For the Petitioners :Mr. O.P. Singh, Advocate Mr. Niranjan Singh, Advocate Mr. Ashish Kr. Shekhar, Advocate For the C.B.I :Mr. K.P. Deo, S.C. ......... 05/Dated: 29/08/2017 Both the anticipatory bail applications arises out of one and the same case, hence they are taken up together and disposed of by common order. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with R.C. Case No. 3(A)/2015 (D) for the offence under sections 120(B), 420 I.P.C and sections 13(2) r/w 13(1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The case of prospection, in short, is that, this case has been lodged on the basis of source informatio...
Christopher Kujur Vs. Union of India Through the Secretary and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2017
Letters Patent Appeal No. 220 of 2009 .... In the matter of an appeal under clause 10 of Letters Patent Christopher Kujur . . . Appellant Versus 1. The Union of India, through the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi 2. Additional Deputy Inspector General of Police, Signal Group Centre, Central Reserve Police Force, Ranchi 3. Deputy Director (Communication), Directorate General, Central Reserve Police Force, New Delhi . . . Respondents .... CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B. B. MANGALMURTI For the Appellant : Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, Advocate Ms. Shilpi John, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Binod Singh, Advocate B.B.Mangalmurti, J.C.A.V ON:11.07.2017 PRONOUNCED ON:29.08.2017 Instant appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 17.04.2009 passed in W.P.(S) No.2813 of 2000 whereby and whereunder finding no merit the writ application of the appellant was dismissed.2. The short fact of the case is that appellant being a constable serving ...
Swapan Kumar Dey Alias Sapan Kumar Dey Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 900 of 2017 with Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 901 of 2017 ------ 1. Swapan Kumar Dey @ Sapan Kumar Dey Appellant in Cr.Appeal (DB) No. 900 of 2017 2. Chitranjan Dey @ Chitta Ranjan De, 3. Suman Kumar Dey @ Suman Kumar De, 4. Anpurna Devi @ Anna Punna De 5. Radha Rani @ Radhi Rani De Appellants in Cr.Appeal (DB) No. 901 of 2017) Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Respondents (in both appeals) ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.B. MANGALMURTI For the Appellants : Mr. Shri Krishna Murari, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Mishra, A.P.P. 05/29.08.2017 Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned A.P.P. on behalf of the State.2. Appellant in Criminal Appeal (DB)No.900 of 2017 is the husband of the deceased while appellants in Criminal Appeal (DB)No.901 of 2017 are the father-in-law, brother-in-law, mother-in-law and step mother-in-law of the deceased lady Re...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »