Jharkhand Court August 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jitendra Kumar and Ors Vs. Finance
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-04-2017
1 W.P.(S) No. 670 OF2017IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 670 OF20171. Jitendra Kumar, son of Surendra Ram; 2. Bhola Nath Mahto, son of Prayag Mahto; 3. Raj Kumar Choudhary, son of Mahabir Chaudhary; 4. Piyush Pravakar, son of Nakul Prasad; 5. Binod Kumar, son of Bijay Bhogata; 6. Radhe Shyam Prasad, son of Jhaul Paswan; 7. Sajiwan Kumar Braik, son of Shyam Braik; 8. Ghaneshyam Mahto, son of Ghasi Ram Mahto Petitioners VERSUS1 State of Jharkhand, 2. The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Jharkhand 3. The Principal Secretary, Forest & Environment Department, Nepal House, Doranda, Ranchi 4. The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Jharkhand Van Bhawan, Ranchi 5. The Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission (Recruitment of Forest Guard), Ranchi through its Chairman. ... Respondents. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S. N. PATHAK For Petitioners : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Sr. Advocate. Mr. Shresth Gautam, Advocate. Mr. Shreya Mishra, Advocate. For the State: M...
M/S Tisco Ltd. Vs. M/S Soma Agency and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-03-2017
First Appeal No. 102 of 1997 --- M/s Tata Iron & Steel Company Limited. --- --- ---- Appellant Versus 1. M/s Soma Agency, a partnership firm, Jamshedpur 2. Mrs. K. Bhargavi Amma 3. T.K. Soman 4. Mrs. Prema Sukumaran 5. Mrs. Letha Narayan 6. Mrs. Sindhu Vijayan ---- --- Respondents --- PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH ----- For the Appellant : Mr. G.M. Mishra, Advocate Mr. Umesh Mishra, Advocate Mr. Ganesh Pathak, Advocate For the Respondents : None ----- By Court: Heard counsel for the appellant. The respondents had appeared through their counsel, but no one appears on behalf of them today. There was no representation on their behalf on the previous date also. The impugned judgment and decree dated 24 th June 1997 / 7th July 1997 passed in Money Suit No.05 of 1994 by learned Sub-Judge-IV, Jamshedpur is in challenge in the present appeal by the defendant/appellant. The suit was for a decree for realisation of Rs. 6,59,826.38/- in favour of the plaintiffs including inte...
Union of India Vs. Chaman Mahto and Ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-03-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI F.A. No. 75 of 2005 Union of India Vrs. Chaman Mahto & others with F.A. No. 76 of 2005 Union of India Vrs. Manju Kumari @ Manju Devi & another with F.A. No. 77 of 2005 Union of India Vrs. Heraman Mahto & others with F.A. No. 78 of 2005 Union of India Vrs. Heraman Mahto & others with F.A. No. 79 of 2005 Union of India Vrs. Heraman Mahto & others with F.A. No. 80 of 2005 Union of India Vrs. Heraman Mahto & others with F.A. No. 81 of 2005 Union of India Vrs. Heraman Mahto & others with F.A. No. 82 of 2005 Union of India Vrs. Govind Rana & others with F.A. No. 83 of 2005 Union of India Vrs. Akbar Ali & another with F.A. No. 84 of 2005 Union of India Vrs. Tejan Mahto & others with F.A. No. 85 of 2005 Union of India Vrs. Anil Kumar Singh & another with F.A. No. 86 of 2005 Union of India Vrs. Beni Mahto & another with F.A. No. 87 of 2005 Union of India Vrs. Dwarika & others with F.A. No. 88 of 2005 Union of India Vrs. Puran Sao & others with F.A. No. 8...
Arvind Kumar ? Arvind Kumar Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-03-2017
Cr. Revision No. 297 of 2005 --------- Against the judgment dated 19.01.2005 passed in Cr. Appeal No. 192 of 2004 by the learned Additional Judicial Commissioner, Fast Track Court No. VI, Ranchi affirming the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Ranchi in G.R. Case No. 271 of 2003. --------- Arvind Kumar @ Arvind Kumar Singh, S/o Sri Bhadra Singh, R/o Village- Chand, P.O. & P.S.- Mandar, District- Ranchi ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Dipankar, Advocate For the State : Md. Asif Khan, A.P.P. --------- Present: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --------- By Court: Heard Mr. Dipankar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Md. Asif Khan, learned A.P.P. for the State. This application is directed against the judgment dated 19.01.2005 passed in Cr. Appeal No. 192 of 2004 by the learned Additional Judicial Commissioner, Fast Track Court No. VI, Ranchi, wh...
Anil Mahli Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-03-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. App. (DB) No. 1209 of 2008 (Against the Judgment of conviction dated 15.5.2008 and Order of sentence dated 16.5.2008 passed by the Additional Judicial Commissioner, F.T.C.-VIII, Ranchi, in S.T. No. 518 of 2004.) Anil Mahli .............APPELLANT -Versus- State of Jharkhand .RESPONDENT For the Appellant : M/s A.K. Kashyap, Sr. Advocate. Supriya Dayal and Anurag Kashyap, Advocates For the State : Mrs. Vandana Bharti, A.P.P. PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN ...... By Court :- Heard the learned senior counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel appearing for the State.2. This criminal appeal is directed against the Judgment of conviction dated 15.5.2008 and Order of sentence dated 16.5.2008, passed by the learned Additional Judicial Commissioner, F.T.C.-VIII, Ranchi, in Session Trial No. 518 of 2004, whereby, the sole appellant has been convicted for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal ...
Soma Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-03-2017
Cr. Revision No. 475 of 2005 (R) --- Against the judgment dated 15.3.2005, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, West Singhbhum at Chaibasa in Cr. Appeal No. 81 of 2004. ----- Soma Singh, Son of Bachan Singh, Takra Bazar, P.S. Jhikpani, District- Singhbhum West. ......Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. .Opposite Party --- For the Petitioner : Mr. R.P. Gupta, Advocate For the State : APP ----- PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- By Court This application is directed against the judgment dated 15.3.2005, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, West Singhbhum at Chaibasa in Cr. Appeal No. 81 of 2004, whereby and whereunder the judgment and order of conviction passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chaibasa in G.R. Case No. 160 of 1998, by which the petitioner was convicted for the offence under sections 420, 379 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code was subsequently modified by affirming the said judgement only with respect to conviction under section ...
Vijay Kumar Choudhary and Anr Vs. Narmadeshwar Prasad Singh and Or
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-03-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 5759 of 2010 1. Vijay Kumar Choudhary 2. Smt. Pushpa Choudhary .. Petitioners Versus 1. Narmadeshwar Prasad Singh 2. Biswa Bandhu Choudhary 3. Biswajit Choudhary 4. Bihar State Financial Corporation, Dhanbad, through its Managing Director .. Respondents ----- CORAM HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioners: M/s Indrajit Sinha, Vipul Poddar For the Respondent No.1: M/s Shubham Gautam, Shivani Verma ----- 05/03.08.2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 05.10.2010 passed by the Sub-Judge-VI, Dhanbad in Title Suit No. 70/1999 whereby, the petition dated 05.10.2010 filed by the petitioners for recalling the order dated 23.09.2010 has been rejected. Further prayer has been made for issuance of direction upon the learned Trial Court to allow the petitioners to examine their Defence Witness No.5 as the last witness.3. The factual matrix of the ca...
Manoranjan Soren and Anr Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-03-2017
Criminal Revision No. 188 of 2005 Against the judgment dated 08.02.2005 passed in Cr. Appeal No. 34 of 2004 by learned Sessions Judge, Jamtara and the Judgment of conviction and the order of sentence dated 30.06.2004 passed in G.R. Case No. 101 of 1998 (T.R. No. 100 of 2004) 1. Manoranjan Soren 2. Sudhir Murmu Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party ---- PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY For the Petitioners : Mr. K. K. Mishra, Advocate For the State : None ---- By Court: Heard Mr. K. K. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner. No one appears for the State.2. This application is directed against the judgment dated 08.02.2005 passed in Cr. Appeal No. 34 of 2004 by learned Sessions Judge, Jamtara, whereby and whereunder, the Judgment of conviction and the order of sentence dated 30.06.2004 passed in G.R. Case No. 101 of 1998 (T.R. No. 100 of 2004), convicting the petitioners for the offences punishable u/s 354/34 I.P.C. and sentencing them to undergo R.I...
Jatal Mandal and Ors Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-03-2017
Cr. Revision No. 272 of 2005 --------- Against the judgment dated 16.03.2005 passed by the learned 2 nd Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Jamtara in Cr. Appeal No. 41 of 2003 / 135 of 2005 affirming the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 21.11.2003 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamtara in P.C.R. Case No. 251 of 1997 (Trial No. 456 of 2003). --------- 1. Jatal Mandal, S/o Gobardhan Mandal 2. Gobardhan Mandal, S/o Late Atul Mandal 3. Damu Devi, W/o Gobardhan Mandal All residents of Village- Kalipather, P.S.- Kundahit, District- Jamtara. ... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party --------- For the Petitioners : Mrs. Gouri Devi, Advocate For the State : None --------- Present: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --------- By Court: Heard Mrs. Gouri Devi, learned counsel for the petitioners. No one appears on behalf of the State. This application is directed against the judgment dated 16.03.2005 passed by the l...
Helena Lakra Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-03-2017
Cr. Revision No. 81 of 2005 (R) --- Against the judgment dated 13.1.2005, passed by the learned Sessions Judge,Simdega, in Sessions Trial No. 58 of 2004. ----- Helena Lakra, Wife of late Matius Lakra, Resident of Village-Pipra, Bandhtoli, P.O. & P.S. Simdega, District-Simdega.......Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand.2. Augustin Kerketta, Son of Piush Kerketta.3. Karlina Kerketta, Wife of Augustin Kerketta. Both residents of Pipra Bandh toil, P.S. Simdega, P.O. Simdega, District-Simdega. .Opposite Parties --- For the Petitioner : None For the State : APP For the O.P. Nos. 2 and 3 : None ----- PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- By Court This application is directed against the judgment dated 13.1.2005, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Simdega in Sessions Trial No. 58 of 2004, whereby and whereunder, opposite party nos. 2 and 3 have been acquitted for the charges levelled against them for the offence under section 302/34 of IPC. Prosecution story in brief is...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »