Jharkhand Court June 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gurucharan Soy Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-15-2017
1 W.P.(S) No. 2845 of 2008 [In the matter of an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India] Gurucharan Soy .. Petitioner Versus 1. State of Jharkhand 2. The Secretary, Department of Home Affairs, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 3. The Director General-cum-Inspector General of Police, Ranchi, Jharkhand 4. The Inspector General of Police, Singhbhum Kolhan Range, Chaibasa 5. The Superintendent of Police, Singhbhum West at Chaibasa .. Respondents ----- Present HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner: Mr. Kumar Vaibhav For the Respondents: Mr. Ashish Kumar Thakur, J.C to S.C (L&C) ----- By Court: Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. In the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of appropriate writ for quashing the order dated 24.09.2007 contained in Memo No. 4016 passed by the respondent No.5 (Annexure-10 to the writ petition) by reasons of which the petitioner has been dismissed from service and also for quashing the order dated...
Anup Kumar Sharma Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-15-2017
1 W.P.(S) No. 589 of 2007 In the matter of an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Anup Kumar Sharma, son of Late Ramindra Sharma, resident of Fire Station, Sindri, P.O. & P.S.Sindri, DistrictDhanbad, at present posted as Agnik, Sindri Fire Station, P.O. & P.S.Sindri, District Dhanbad Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. State Fire Brigade Officer, Govt. of Jharkhand, P.O. & P.S.Nepal House, Town & DistrictRanchi 3. District Fire Brigade Officer, Dhanbad, P.O. & P.S.Dhanbad, DistrictDhanbad 4. Station incharge, Sindri Fire Station, P.O. & P.S.Sindri, District Dhanbad ... Respondents For the Petitioner : Mr. M.B. Lal , Advocate For the RespondentState : Mrs. C. Prabha, SCIV Mr. Vishal Kumar Rai, JC to SCIV PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR By Court: Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for quashing orders dated 03.11.2004 (An...
Jokhan Mochi Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-15-2017
1 Cr. Appeal (S.J) No. 337 of 2003 (Against the judgment of conviction dated 09.01.2003 and order of sentence dated 10.01.2003 passed by Sri Ramanuj Narain, learned 7th Additional District and Sessions Judge, Palamau at Daltonganj, in S.T. No. 199 of 1990) Jokhan Mochi, son of Somaru Mochi, resident of village- Rewratu, P.S. Lesliganj, District-Palamau Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... Respondent .. For the Appellant : Mr. A.K.Kashyap, Advocate For the State : A.P.P PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN By Court:- The appellant has challenged judgment of conviction dated 09.01.2003 and order of sentence dated 10.01.2003 passed by 7th Additional District and Sessions Judge, Palamau at Daltonganj, whereby this sole appellant has been convicted for offence under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code and has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years and further directed to pay a fine of Rs. 1000/- and in default of payment of fine he was further directed...
Chandra Shekhar Ram Vs. Rekha Devi
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-14-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI First Appeal No. 12 of 2015 ------- (Against the Judgment and Decree dated 08th December, 2014 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Garhwa, in M.M. Case No. 06 of 2013) Chandra Shekhar Ram . Appellant -Versus- Rekha Devi ..... Respondent ------- PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RATNAKER BHENGRA ------- For the Appellant : : M/S Saibal Mitra, S.T.Sajid Priti Kumari, Advocates For the Respondent: : Mr. Sabyasanchi, Advocate ------ By Court:- Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondent.2. At the very outset it may be stated that during the pendency of the appeal in this Court, efforts were made for amicable settlement of the dispute between the parties at the hands of the trained Mediator at JHALSA and the matter was referred for mediation. The report of the Mediator has been received in this Court which shows that in spite of his best efforts, the matrimonial dispute bet...
Amit Kumar Singh Vs. Neha Singh
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-14-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI F. A. No. 100 of 2015 [ Against the Judgment and Decree 29th of January, 2015, passed in Title Matrimonial Suit No. 450 of 2008, by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Dhanbad. ] Amit Kumar Singh ..... Appellant Versus Neha Singh .. Respondent -------- PRESENT : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RATNAKER BHENGRA ------ For the Appellant : Mr. Ajay Kumar Pathak, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. Kalyan Banerjee, Advocate. -------- By Court:- Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondent. As the efforts of conciliation between the parties have failed, we have heard learned counsels on merits.2. The appellant husband is aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree dated th 29 of January, 2015, passed in Title Matrimonial Suit No. 450 of 2008, by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Dhanbad, whereby the matrimonial suit, filed by the appellant-husband, under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu ...
Mithilesh Kumar Sah Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-14-2017
W.P.(S) No. 1703 of 2008 ( In the matter of an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) ----- Mithilesh Kumar Sah Son of Late Bishwanath Sah, presently residing at Shradhanand Road, Upper Bazar, PO & PS- Kotwali, District- Ranchi . . Petitioner --Versus-- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 3. The Under Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi . . Respondents For the petitioner : M/s. Rajendra Krishna & Amit Sinha, Advocates For the State-respondent: Mrs. Rakhi Rani, J.C. to G.A.-IV PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- By Court : Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. The present writ petition has been filed for issuance of a writ of certiorari for quashing the order of punishment contained in Memo no. 2590 dated 23.06.2005 (Annexure-6 to the writ petition) and also for quashing the part of the inquiry report dated 19.07.2001 (Annexure-3 to the writ petition...
Shrimati Jagapatiya Devi and Ors Vs. Amrik Singh and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-13-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI M.A. No.143 of 2010 --- 1. Shrimati Jagapatiya Devi, wife of late Mahabir Singh 2. Dinesh Kumar, s/o late Harinder Singh 3. Rekha Kumari, D/o late Harinder Singh. All r/o Pesrar, P.O.P.S & District- Latehar. ..Appellants. Versus 1. Amrik Singh, s/o Kewal Singh, permanent address at Faridabad, P.O.216/16 Faridabad, P.S.Faridabad, District-Haryana, at present r/o Circular Rod, P.O.P.S Lalpur, District-Ranchi.2. National Insurance Company Limited, c/O Divisionl Manager, Hazaribagh, P.O.P.S & District Hazaribagh. . Respondents. ----- CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AMITAV K.GUPTA -- For the Appellants : Mr. V.K.Sharma. Advocate. For the Respondent No.2 : M/s.Alok Lal, Advocate. ---- 16/13.06.2017 The present appeal has been preferred by the claimants for enhancement of the awarded compensation of Rs.2,26,000/- payable by the respondent/National Insurance ...
Poonam Devi Vs. Manoj Kumar Gupta
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-12-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI First Appeal No. 214 of 2013 ------- (Against the judgment and decree dated 21st August, 2013 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Palamau at Daltonganj, in Matrimonial Case No. 26F of 2009) Poonam Devi . Appellant -Versus- Manoj Kumar Gupta ..... Respondent ------- PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RATNAKER BHENGRA ------- For the Appellant : : Mr. V.S. Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent: : Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate ------ By Court:- Pursuant to the order dated 10th May, 2017, respondent Manoj Kumar Gupta has paid Rs. 6000/- to the appellant Poonam Devi in the Court. The appellant has also acknowledged the same in the ordersheet.2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondent on the merits of this appeal, as the efforts of amicable settlement of the matrimonial dispute between the parties have failed.3. The appellant is aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree dated 21s...
Mithilesh Thakur Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-12-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 558 of 2009 With I.A. No. 5582 of 2016 Mithilesh Thakur Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand Respondent With Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 633 of 2009 Sharwan Thakur Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand Respondent With Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 332 of 2012 With I.A. No. 7483 of 2016 Akhilesh Thakur Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand Respondent -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RATNAKER BHENGRA For the Appellants : M/s. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : M/s. Nehru Mahto, A.P.P. -------- 19/ 12.06.2017 :- Criminal Appeal No. 558 of 2009 and Criminal Appeal No. 633 of 2009 arise out of the common Judgement of conviction dated 29.05.2009 and Order of sentence dated 30.05.2009 passed in Sessions Trial No. 45 of 2002, by the learned 1 st Additional Sessions Judge, Garhwa, whereas Criminal Appeal No. 332 of 2012 arises out of the Judgement of conviction dated 20.01.2012 and Order...
Jugnu Construction and Ors. Vs. Central Coalfields Ltd.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-12-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI --- F.A. No.134 of 2005 With F.A.No.135 of 2005 Against the judgment and decree dated 15.09.2005 and 26.09.2005 respectively passed in Money Suit no.2/2000 by the learned Sub-Judge-I, Bermo at Tenughat. --- 1. Jugnu Construction, a partnership firm carrying on business at Naya Road, Phusro, P.S.Bermo, P.O. Phushro,District-Bokaro through its partner Shri Lalan Kumar Singh,S/o Shri Ramaslok Singh, r/o Phsro Bazar, P.S.Bsermo, P.O. Phsro, District-Bokaro.2. Shri Lalan Kumar Singh, s/o Shri Ramaslok Singh, Partner, Jugnu Construction, P.O.Bermo, District-Bokaro, r/o of Phsro Bazar, P.S.Bermo,P.O.Phsro,District-Bokaro. 3, Sri Sudarshkan Tiwary, s/o lae ChamanTiwari, Partner, Jugnu Construction, r/o Phsro Bazar, P.S.Bermo,P.O.Phsro,District- Bokaro. ..... Appellants. Versus Central Coalfields Limited, a Government Company within the meaning of Section 617 of Companies Act, 1956 being one of the Subsidiary Companies of Coal India Limited, having its...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »