Jharkhand Court May 2017 Judgments
Mrityunjay Kumar and Anr Vs. Rural Dev Dept
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: May-26-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 2816 of 2017 Mrityunjay Kumar and Anr. Petitioners Versus State of Jharkhand & Ors. ... ... Respondents ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S. N. PATHAK ----- For Petitioners : Mr. Sameer Saurav, Advocate Mr. Sunil Kumar Mahto, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Tejo Mistri, Advocate Mr. P.K. Mukhopadhyay, Advocate ------ 02/ 26.05.2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents.2. The petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer for quashing the advertisement of Intermediate Level (For Computer Knowledge and Hindi Typing Posts) Combined Competitive Examination, 2017, by which the applications were invited from the eligible candidates for appointment on the post of Panchayat Sevaks in Gram Panchayats, as the said advertisement is contrary to the Jharkhand Panchayat Sevak (Niyukti, Seva-Shart evam Kartavya) Niyamavali (Sanshodhit) 2014 (Annexure-2) and notification dated 13.01.2017 (...
Tag this Judgment!Sandip Oraon Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: May-22-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 2862 of 2017 Md. Tauhid Ali ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite party --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Md. Zaid Ahmed, Adv. For the Opposite party : APP --------- 02/Dated:22. 05.2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State & informant. The defects as pointed out by the office is hereby ignored. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with the case registered under Sections 11(1) a,c,d,e,f,h,l,k,38/3 and 29(1) (2) of Prevention from Cruelty to Animal Act, Rule 47. 48, 50, 52, 54, 56 (c ) of transport and improvement Act, and Section 3 , 4 (a) (b) (d) , 5, 6, 12, (1), (2) (3), 13, 15, 16 of Jharkhand Bovine Animal Prohibition of Slaughter Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is the owner of truck bearing registration no.WB19 6292. Learned APP has opposed the prayer for ...
Tag this Judgment!Awadh Kumar Dangi Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: May-19-2017
1 Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 1354 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 1354 of 2006 (Against the Judgment of conviction dated 3.7.2006 and Order of sentence dated 4.7.2006 passed by learned Addl. Sessions Judge-Fast Track Court No.III, Hazaribag, in S.T. No. 43 of 2005). ------------- Awadh Kumar Dangi .. Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Respondent -------- For the Appellant : Mr. Arwind Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, A.P.P. -------- PRESENT : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY ------- By Court:- Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the State.2. The appellant Awadh Kumar Dangi is aggrieved by the Judgment of conviction dated 3.7.2006 and Order of sentence dated 4.7.2006, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-III, Hazaribagh, in S.T. No.43 of 2005, whereby, the appellant, who is husband of deceased, has been found guilty and convicted f...
Tag this Judgment!Kailash Pandit Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: May-18-2017
Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 1436 of 2008 with I.A. No. 5809 of 2016 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 1436 of 2008 with I.A. No. 5809 of 2016 (Against the Judgment of Conviction dated 23.10.2008 and order of Sentence dated 24.10.2008 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-Fast Track Court, Koderma, in Sessions Trial No. 2 of 2008). ------------- Kailash Pandit .. Appellant Versus State of Jharkhand .. Respondent -------- For the Appellant : M/s Kaushik Sarkhel & D.K. Deo, Advocates For the Respondent-State : Mr. Azimuddin, A.P.P. -------- PRESENT : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY ------- By Court.:- Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the State.2. The appellant is aggrieved by the Judgment of conviction dated 23.10.2008 and Order of sentence dated 24.10.2008 passed in Sessions Trial No. 2 of 2008, by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Koderma, whereby, the appella...
Tag this Judgment!Kundan Kumar Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: May-17-2017
1 Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 681 of 2007 Against the Judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 26th April, 2007 and 30th April, 2007, respectively passed by Additional Sessions Judge F.T.C-Ist,Bokaro, in Sessions Trial No. 133 of 2006. .. Kundan Kumar, son of Sri Parsu Ram Singh, resident of Tara Nagar, Chas, P.S. Chas, District-Bokaro Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand Respondent For the Appellant : Mr. A.K.Kashyap, Sr. Advocate Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shekhar Sinha, A.P.P. PRESENT Honble the Chief Justice Honble Mr. Justice Ananda Sen JUDGMENT By Court This Criminal appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 26 th April, 2007 and 30th April, 2007, respectively passed by Additional Sessions Judge F.T.C-Ist, Bokaro, in Sessions Trial No. 133 of 2006, whereby the learned Sessions Judge convicted the appellant under Section 364 (A) of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment f...
Tag this Judgment!Abhimanyu Goswami Vs. State of Bihar
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: May-16-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Appeal No.65 of 1992 (R) With Criminal Appeal No.105 of 1992 (R) (Against the Judgment of conviction and Order of sentence dated 30th April 1992 passed by learned 2 nd Addl. Sessions Judge, Dhanbad, in S.T. No.49 of 1990) 1. Panchu Goswami 2. Suresh Goswami . Appellants (in Cr. Appeal No.65 of 1992) Abhimanyu Goswami . Appellant (in Cr. Appeal No.105 of 1992) -Versus - The State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) .. Respondent (in both cases) PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE Dr. S. N. PATHAK .. For the Appellants : Mr. Yogesh Modi, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, APP Reserved on :3. 5.2017 Pronounced on :16. 5.2017 H.C. Mishra, J.:- As both these appeals arise out of the common Judgment, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common Judgment.2. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for the State in both the appeals.3. The appellants are aggrieved by the Judgment of c...
Tag this Judgment!Parmeshwar Jha Vs. Water Resources Departement
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: May-16-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 3551 of 2013 ------- Parmeshwar Jha, Son of Late Mahabir Jha, Resident of Kusum Vihar, Morabadi, P.O and P.S. Morabadi, Dist Ranchi ... Petitioner Versus 1.State of Jharkhand through Secretary, Water Resources Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi. 2.The Deputy Secretary, Water Resources Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi, P.O & P.S. & District Ranchi. 3.The Chief Engineer (Mechanical) Water Resources Department, Govt of Jharkhand, Ranchi, P.O & P.S. & Dist Ranchi. 4.The Executive Engineer, Rural Development Special Division, Lohardaga, P.O & P.S. & Dist Ranchi. 5.The Joint Secretary (Vigilance ), Water Resources Department, Govt of Jharkhand, Ranchi, P.O & P.S. & Dist Ranchi. Respondents ------ CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Sr Advocate. Mr. Amit Kumar Tiwari, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Binod Kumar Singh, S.C. (L &C) ------ C.A.V on 01.03.2017 Delivered on 16...
Tag this Judgment!Bajo Mandal and Ors. Vs. State
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: May-16-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Appeal No.385 of 1992(P) (Against the Judgment of conviction dated 9.9.1992 and Order of sentence dated 14.9.1992 passed by learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Deoghar, in Sessions Case No.59 of 1991 / 3 of 1991) 1. Karman Mandal 2. Muso Mandal . Appellants -Versus - The State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) .. Respondent PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE Dr. S. N. PATHAK .. For the Appellant : Mr. Sidhartha Ray, Advocate For the State : Mr. Krishna Shankar, APP Reserved on :4. 5.2017 Pronounced on :16. 5.2017 H.C. Mishra, J.:- Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for the State.2. This appeal has abated qua the co-appellants, Bajo Mandal and Bijo Devi, who are now dead, vide order dated 3.5.2017.3. The surviving appellants Karman Mandal and Muso Mandal are aggrieved by the Judgment of conviction dated 9.9.1992 and Order of sentence dated 14.9.1992, passed by the learned 1 st Additional Sessi...
Tag this Judgment!Hariher Bhuian and Anr Vs. State of Bihar
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: May-16-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal No. 174 of 1992 (R) 1. Hariher Bhuian 2. Sudeshwer Bhuian Appellants Versus The State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) Respondent -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE Dr. S.N.PATHAK For the Appellants : M/s. Pankaj Kumar Dubey, Advocate For the State : M/s. Satish Kumar Keshari, A.P.P. -------- C.A.V. on 17.04.2017 Pronounced on 16.05.2017 H.C. Mishra, J.:- Heard learned counsel for the surviving appellants Hariher Bhuian and Sudeshwer Bhuian and the learned counsel for the State.2. The appellants are aggrieved by the Judgement of conviction and Order of sentence dated 05.09.1992 passed by the learned Second Additional Sessions Judge, Palamau in S.T. No. 172 of 1990, whereby these appellants along with the other two co-appellants, who are since dead, have been convicted for the offences under Sections 302 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The appellant Hariher ...
Tag this Judgment!Ajay Ram Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: May-16-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. W.P. (S) No. 3542 of 2010 Ajay Ram, son of Late Jgnath Ram, Resident of-Thana Road, Subhash Chowk, P.O.-Lohardaga, District-Lohardaga Petitioner -V e r s u s- 1.The State of Jharkhand. 2.Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Project Building, P.O. and P.S.-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi. 3.Engineer-in-Chief, Road Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi. 4.Chief Engineer, Road Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi.5. Executive Engineer, Road Construction Department, Lohardaga.6. Superintending Engineer, National Highway, Road Circle, Ranchi.7. Superintending Engineer, National Highway Circle, Ranchi. Respondents CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK. For the Petitioner : - Mr. Saurabh Shekhar, Advocate. For the Respondents : - Mrs. Richa Sanchita, S.C. V. C.A.V. On: -01.12.2016 Delivered On: - 16/05/2017 Per Pramath Patnaik, J.: In the captioned writ application, the petitioner has, inter ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »