Jharkhand Court March 2017 Judgments
Satyendra Kumar Tiwari Vs. Education
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-23-2017
1 LPA No. 388 of 2013, with WP(S) No. 6220 of 2016 with WP(S) No. 6221 of 2016. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No. 388 of 2013 with W.P. (S) No. 6220 of 2016 with W.P. (S) No. 6221 of 2016 In LPA No. 388 of 2013 Binay Kumar Tiwary ..... Appellant Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand.2. The Secretary, Primary Education, Human Resources Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi.3. The Director, Primary Education, Human Resources Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi.4. The Deputy Commissioner, Garhwa.5. The District Superintendent of Education, Garhwa. Respondents 1st party 6. Ravindra Kumar Ojha 7. Pratap Kumar Pandey 8. Dev Prakash Dwivedi 9. Ajay Prakash Dwivedi 10.Sunil Kumar Dubey. 11.Alok Kumar .. Respondents 2nd party In W.P.(S) No. 6220 of 2016 Satyendra Kumar Tiwari ..... Petitioner In W.P.(S) No. 6221 of 2016 Pankaj Kumar Pandey ..... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand.2. The Secretary, School Education & Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranc...
Tag this Judgment!Vinay Kumar Tiwary Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-23-2017
1 LPA No. 388 of 2013, with WP(S) No. 6220 of 2016 with WP(S) No. 6221 of 2016. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No. 388 of 2013 with W.P. (S) No. 6220 of 2016 with W.P. (S) No. 6221 of 2016 In LPA No. 388 of 2013 Binay Kumar Tiwary ..... Appellant Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand.2. The Secretary, Primary Education, Human Resources Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi.3. The Director, Primary Education, Human Resources Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi.4. The Deputy Commissioner, Garhwa.5. The District Superintendent of Education, Garhwa. Respondents 1st party 6. Ravindra Kumar Ojha 7. Pratap Kumar Pandey 8. Dev Prakash Dwivedi 9. Ajay Prakash Dwivedi 10.Sunil Kumar Dubey. 11.Alok Kumar .. Respondents 2nd party In W.P.(S) No. 6220 of 2016 Satyendra Kumar Tiwari ..... Petitioner In W.P.(S) No. 6221 of 2016 Pankaj Kumar Pandey ..... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand.2. The Secretary, School Education & Literacy Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranc...
Tag this Judgment!Ms Shah Brothers Through One of Its Partner Sri Raj Kumar Shah Vs. The ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-23-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 5856 of 2016 --- M/s Shah Brothers, Chaibasa Petitioner -V e r s u s- 1. Union of India 2. The Director, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, New Delhi 3. The State of Jharkhand through its Principal Secretary, Department of Forest, Government of Jharkhand 4. The Divisional Forest Officer, Saranda Forest Division, Chaibasa. ....Respondents --- CORAM:The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitioner : Mr. Krishanu Ray, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ajit Kumar, A.A.G. For the UOI : Mr. Rajiv Sinha, ASGI ----- 06/23.03.2017: Order dated 27th October 2016, which contains the grievances of the petitioner as originally raised herein, is quoted hereunder for better appreciation :- Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset submits that issue involved in the instant matter is similar to that raised in W. P.(C) No. 5695 of 2016 on behalf of the Steel Authority of India Ltd. also on board today wherein an int...
Tag this Judgment!Sidu Kanu Siksha Niketan Trust Through Its Chairman Mangal Murmu Vs. T ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-22-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 4945 of 2015 --- Sidu Kanu Siksha Niketan Trust, Dimna Nagar, Jamshedpur through its Chairman Mangal Murmu --- ---- Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Deputy Commissioner, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur 3. The Additional District Magistrate, Law and Order, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur 4. Sub Divisional Magistrate, Dhalbhum, Jamshedpur 5. District Superintendent of Education cum Incharge Magistrate, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur 6. Sonaram Majhi 7. The Additional Deputy Commissioner, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur --- --- Respondents --- CORAM:The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitioner: M/s Sanjay Kumar, Rajeev Lochan, Advocates For the Resp State: Mr. Sharad Kaushal, JC to A.A.G. For the Resp No. 6: Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate --- 07/ 22.03.2017 Heard counsel for the parties.2. Petitioner aggrieved by an office order dated 14.09.2015 issued by the Respondent No. 4 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Dhalbhum, Jamshedp...
Tag this Judgment!Shanti Devi Vs. State
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-22-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Appeal (D.B.) No. 59 of 1992 (R) (Against the Judgment of conviction and Order of sentence dated 09.03.1992, passed by the learned 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Dhanbad, in S.C. No. 272 of 1989) Shanti Devi ...... Appellant Versus The State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) .. Respondent -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE Dr. S.N. PATHAK -------- For the Appellant : Mr. Mahesh Tewari, Advocate Mr. Abhishek Kumar Dubey, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. S.K. Shrivastava, APP -------- By Court:- Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the State.2. The sole appellant is aggrieved by the Judgment of conviction and Order of sentence dated 09.03.1992, passed by the learned 6 th Additional Sessions Judge, Dhanbad, in S.C. No. 272 of 1989, whereby the appellant, who is the wife of the deceased, has been found guilty and convicted for the offence under Sections 302 / 34 and 201 of the Indian P...
Tag this Judgment!Akhtar Ansari Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-22-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 144 of 2017 ---------- Akhtar Ansari, S/o Anwar Ansari, R/o Village- Thari, P.O. + P.S.- Chitra, District- Deoghar. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party ---------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY ---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kumar Choudhary, Advocate For the State : Ms. Vandana Bharati, A.P.P. ---------- 05/22.03.2017 Heard Mr. Arvind Kumar Choudhary, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Vandana Bharti, learned A.P.P. for the State. In this application the petitioner prays for quashing of the order dated 04.01.2017 passed by the learned 1 st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Deoghar in POCSO Case No. 55 of 2016, arising out of Chitra P.S. Case No. 81 of 2016, G.R. No. 746 of 2016, whereby and whereunder the application preferred by the petitioner for being granted bail under the Provision of Section 167 (2) of the Cr.P.C. has been rejected. A written complaint was ...
Tag this Judgment!Pankaj Srivastava Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through Central Bureau of ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-22-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 2766 of 2016 --- Pankaj Srivastava, Son of late H.M. Srivastava, Resident of 201, Dropadi Smriti Apartment, Neel Ratan Street, Upper Bazar, Ranchi, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Kotwali, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand through C.B.I. Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Sr. Advocate For the C.B.I. : Mr. K.P. Deo, Advocate --- 06/22.03.2017 Heard the parties. In this application, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the entire criminal proceeding in connection with RC11(S)/2015/SC-1, New Delhi including the order dated 4.11.2016, passed by the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate cum Special Judicial Magistrate, C.B.I., Ranchi, wherey and whereunder cognizance has been taken for the offence punishable under sections 212/120B of the Indian Penal Code.2. Initially an FIR was instituted being Kotwali (Hindpidhi) P.S. Case N...
Tag this Judgment!Ganesh Prajapati Alias Ganeshia Vs. State of Bihar
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-22-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Revision No. 295 of 2000 (R ) With Criminal Revision No. 298 of 2000 (R ) --- Ganesh Prajapati @ Ganeshia, son of Shri Shyam Deo Prajapati, Deori Road, Jabla, P. S. Hussinabad, District Palamau (Petitioner in Cr. Rev. No. 295 of 2000 (R ) Chandan Kumar Singh, son of Sri Deo Kumar Singh, resident of village Saidabad, P. S. Hussainabad, District - Palamau (Petitioner in Cr. Rev. No. 298 of 2000 (R ) Versus The State of Bihar (Opp. Party in both the cases) --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioners : Mr. P. C. Tripathy, Sr. Advocate (In Cr. Rev. No. 295 of 2000 (R ) : Mr. P. S. Dayal, Advocate (In Cr. Rev. No. 298 of 2000 (R ) For the Opp. Party : Mr. Satish Kumar Keshri, A.P.P. --- C.A.V. on 06.03.2017 Pronounced on 22.03.2017 Heard Mr. P. C. Tripathy, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner in Criminal Revision No. 295 of 2000 (R ), Mr. P. S. Dayal, learned counsel appearing for the petition...
Tag this Judgment!Pramod Oraon Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-22-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 1391 of 2015 ---------- Pramod Oraon @ Pramod Ram, S/o Sri Mangra Oraon, R/o Village- Darkesha Ambatoli, P.O. & P.S.- Bharno, District- Gumla. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party ---------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY ---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Mohit Prakash, Advocate For the State : None ---------- 07/22.03.2017 Heard Mr. Mohit Prakash, learned counsel for the petitioner. No one appears on behalf of the State. This application is directed against the order dated 14.10.2015 passed by the learned District & Additional Sessions Judge-I, Gumla in Misc. Case No. 02 of 2015, in connection with Sisai (Bharno) P.S. Case No. 02 of 2015, corresponding to G.R. No. 17 of 2015 (S.T. No. 146 of 2015), whereby and whereunder the application preferred by the petitioner for declaring him to be a juvenile has been rejected. It appears that a First Information Report was instituted by one Sarin...
Tag this Judgment!Sanju Gupta Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-22-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 2375 of 2016 --- Sanju Gupta, S/o late Lalan Prasad, Resident of House No. 167, Line No. 5, Kashidih Sakchi, P.O. & P.S. Sakchi, District-Singhbhum East. ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. P.P.N. Roy, Sr. Advocate For the State : A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Niazi, Advocate --- 07/22.03.2017 Heard the parties. In this application, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the order dated 28.9.2016, passed by the learned District & Sessions Judge-II, Jamshedpur, Singhbhum East in S.T. No. 280 of 2007, whereby and whereunder the application preferred by the petitioner to search out the original missing case diary along with the original documents has been rejected. A further prayer has been made for quashing of that part of the order dated 29.6.2008, by which the prosecution evidence has been ordered to be closed and the case h...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- Next ›
- Last »