Jharkhand Court February 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Janki Mahto and Ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-16-2017
Cr. Revision No. 83 of 2001 --------- In the matter of an application under Sections 397 and 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. --------- 1. Janki Mahto, S/o Late Shatrughan Mahto, 2. Pritam Mahto, S/o Late Shatrughan Mahto, 3. Somar Mahto, S/o Sri Pritam Mahto, All are residents of Village- Kumhartoli, Shalkhu Tand, P.S.- Chas (Mufassil), District- Bokaro ... Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Gangu Mahto, S/o Late Jadu Mahto, Village- Kumhari Tola- Salkhudih, P.S.- Chas, Dist- Bokaro. ... Opposite Parties --------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Rajendra Prasad, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Pandey, A.P.P. --------- Present: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --------- By Court: Heard Mr. Rajendra Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Sanjay Kr. Pandey, learned A.P.P. for the State. This application is directed against the judgment dated 09.01.2001 passed by the learned 1 st Additional Sessions Judge, Bokaro in Cr. Appeal no. 8 of 1997 wh...
Jasbir Singh Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-16-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (Cr.) No.373 of 2016 --- Jasbir Singh, son of Baldev Singh, R/o Bhusan Colony, Baridih, P.O. P.S.-Sidhgora, Town-Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.The District Magistrate cum Deputy Commissioner, Singhbhum East, Jamshedpur, P.O. and P.S. Sakchi, Jamshedpur, East Singhbhum 3.Senior Superintendent of Police, Singhbhum East, Jamshedpur,P.O. and P.S. Sakchi, Jamshedpur, East Singhbhum 4.Superintendent of Police, Singhbhum East, Jamshedpur, P.O. and P.S. Sakchi, Jamshedpur, East Singhbhum Opposite Parties --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Amit Kumar Das, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vijayant Verma, J.C. to G.P II. --- 07/16.02.2017 Heard Mr. Amit Kumar Das, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Vijayant Verma, learned J.C. to G.P. II appearing on behalf of the State. In this writ application the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order date...
Beni Yadav Through His Duly Constructed Power of Attorney Holder Sri N ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-15-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 4191 of 2016 with W.P. (C) No. 4115 of 2016 with W.P. (C) No. 4193 of 2016 --- Beni Yadav --- ---- Petitioner [in all cases] Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Principal Secretary cum Revision Authority, Forest, Environment and Climate Change Department, Government of Jharkhand 3. The Deputy Commissioner, Jamtara 4. The Divisional Forest Officer cum Authorized Officer, Jamtara 5. The Forest Range Officer, Jamtara --- --- Respondents [in all cases] --- CORAM:The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitioner: Mr. Munna Lal Yadav, Advocate For the Resp State: Mr. Navin Kr. Singh, JC to GA-III & JC to SC-IV --- 06/ 15.02.2017 Matters have been taken up on mentioning by the learned counsel for the petitioner with consent of the counsel for the Respondents.2. In WPC No. 4191/2016, the order dated 11.01.2016 passed by the Revisional Authority cum Principal Secretary, Forest, Environment and Climate Change Department, ...
Shivesh Kumar Jha Vs. Minu Jha Alias Golden
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-15-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI F. A. No. 573 of 2014 [Against the Judgment and Decree dated 22nd of August, 2014, passed in Title Matrimonial Suit No. 228 of 2009, by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Dhanbad. ] Shivesh Kumar Jha ..... Appellant Versus Minu Jha @ Golden .. Respondent -------- PRESENT : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S.N. PATHAK ------ For the Appellant : M/s Nitin Kumar Pasari & Sudhir Kumar Singh, Advocates. For the respondent : M/s Indrajit Sinha & A.K. Sah, Advocates -------- By Court: Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the sole respondent. Both the parties are also present in Court in person.2. The plaintiff appellant is aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree dated 22nd of August, 2014, passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Dhanbad, in Title Matrimonial Suit No. 228 of 2009, whereby the suit, filed by the appellant husband for dissolution of marriage between the parties, by a d...
Beni Yadav Vs. Forest
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-15-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 4191 of 2016 with W.P. (C) No. 4115 of 2016 with W.P. (C) No. 4193 of 2016 --- Beni Yadav --- ---- Petitioner [in all cases] Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Principal Secretary cum Revision Authority, Forest, Environment and Climate Change Department, Government of Jharkhand 3. The Deputy Commissioner, Jamtara 4. The Divisional Forest Officer cum Authorized Officer, Jamtara 5. The Forest Range Officer, Jamtara --- --- Respondents [in all cases] --- CORAM:The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitioner: Mr. Munna Lal Yadav, Advocate For the Resp State: Mr. Navin Kr. Singh, JC to GA-III & JC to SC-IV --- 06/ 15.02.2017 Matters have been taken up on mentioning by the learned counsel for the petitioner with consent of the counsel for the Respondents.2. In WPC No. 4191/2016, the order dated 11.01.2016 passed by the Revisional Authority cum Principal Secretary, Forest, Environment and Climate Change Department, ...
- Case No.0 of N Mohammad Akhter Vs. State and Anr.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-15-2017
Cr. Revision No. 426 of 2000 --------- In the matter of an application under Sections 397 and 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. --------- Mohammad Akhtar, S/o Md. Ishaque, R/o Village- Gangti, P.S.- Jasidih, District- Deoghar ... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar now Jharkhand 2. Jubeda Khatoon, D/o Anwar Ali, R/o Village- Gangti, P.S.- Jasidih, District- Deoghar ... Opposite Parties --------- with Cr. Revision No. 350 of 2000 --------- 1. Mohammad Ishaque, S/o Late Uddin Mian 2. Bakridan Bibi, W/o Mohammad Ishaque Both are resident of Village- Gangti, P.S.- Jasidih, District- Deoghar ... Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Bihar now Jharkhand 2. Jubeda Khatoon, D/o Anwar Ali, R/o Village- Gangti, P.S.- Jasidih, District- Deoghar ... Opposite Parties --------- with Cr. Revision No. 421 of 2000 --------- Md. Mustaque, S/o Md. Issaque, R/o Village- Gangati, P.S.- Jasidih, District- Jasidih ... Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Bihar now Jharkhand 2. Jubeda Khatoon, D/o...
M/S Hari Om Traders Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-15-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No.904 of 2012 M/s. Hari Om Traders, DistrictRanchi.... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Engineer in Chief, Rural Works Department, Jharkhand, Ranchi 3. The Chief Engineer, Jharkhand State Rural Road Development Authority, Ranchi 4. The Chief Engineer, Rural Engineering Organization, DistrictRanchi 5. The Superintending Engineer, Rural Works Circle, Chaibasa, DistrictSinghbhum West 6. The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, DistrictSinghbhum East . ........... Respondents. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Tandon, Advocate For the Respondents : J. C to A.G 12/15.2.2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and RespondentState. Petitioner was awarded work under Agreement no. 8/200809 under PMGSY Package No. JH0603, PhaseVth, in the district of East Singhbhum for execution of work relating to (i) Kadamdih to Marchagora5.388 Km.; ...
Dr Abdul Quayum Khan and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-14-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2662 of 2016 1.Dr. Abdul Quayum Khan 2.Mobina Khatoon 3.Nasrin Begum @ Nasreen 4.Nayyar Iqbal Khan .. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opp. Party WITH A.B.A. No. 4050 of 2016 Dr. Naushad Akhtar Khan .. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Anr. .. Opp. Parties --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH --------- For the Petitioners : Mr. A.K. Kasyap, Sr. Advocate. For the State : Mr. Nehru Manto, A.P.P. Mr. G.S. Prasad, Advocate. For the Informant : Mr. Ashok Kumar Sinha, Advocate. Mr. Ram Narayan Upadhyay, Advocate. --------- Reserved on :13. 02/2017 Pronounced on :14. 02/2017 Both the anticipatory bail applications are heard together as they arise from the same F.I.R. i.e. Azad Nagar P.S. Case No. 81 of 2016, corresponding to G.R. No. 1497 of 2016, registered under Sections 406, 420, 498A, 34 of the I.P.C. and Section 3 / 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, lodged on the basis of one written report given by Sana...
Suresh Oraon and Ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-14-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 3403 of 2005 ----- 1. Suresh Oraon, son of late Goria Oraon, residing at Pugunwa Toli, PO, PS & District-Gumla 2. Kishore Oraon, son of late Ratan Oraon, residing at Pugunwa Toli, PO, PS & District-Gumla 3. Chandra Sekhar Bhagat, son of late Somra Bhaat, residing at Lamati Belgara, PO & PS-Ghagra, District-Gumla 4. Jagarnath Baraik, son of Shri Uday Nath Baraik, residing at Bhadauli, PO & PS-Sisai, District-Gumla 5. Anil Ram, son of Shri Ganesh Ram, residing at Harizan Colony, PO, PS & District-Gumla 6. Bhikam Tana Bhagat, son of Shri Ramdeo Tana Bhagat, residing at Tigawal, PO & PS-Chainpur, District-Gumla 6(i) Smt. Yasoda Devi, W/o late Bhikham Tana Bhagat 6(ii) Nityanand Kumar Bhagat, s/o late Bhikham Tana Bhagat 6(iii) Dayanand Kumar Bhaghat, s/o late Bhikham Tana Bhagat 6(iv) Vihwanand Kumar Bhaghat, s/o late Bhikham Tana Bhagat 7. Smt. Pratima Gupta, wife of Sri Manohar Prasad, residing at Murkunda, PO & PS-Murkunda, District-G...
Baju Rout ? Bijan Rout Vs. Kanchan Devi
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-14-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI First Appeal No. 28 of 2011 Baju Rout @ Bijan Rout ...... Appellant Versus Kanchan Devi .. Respondent -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE Dr. S.N. PATHAK ------ For the Appellant : Mr. S.K. Deo, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. R.K. Mahtha, Advocate ------- 10/ 14.02.2017 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondent.2. The appellant is aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree dated 04.02.2011 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Deoghar, in Matrimonial Suit No. 96 of 2008, whereby the suit filed by the petitioner appellant for dissolution of marriage between the parties by a decree of divorce, has been dismissed with costs.3. It may be stated that during the pendency of this appeal, both the parties were directed to be present in the Court in person for making efforts of reconciliation between the parties. The respondent wife did not appear in the Court in spite of ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »