Skip to content

Jharkhand Court December 2017 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Dec 12 2017

Ramji Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors.

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Dec-12-2017

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. W.P. (S) No. 3649 of 2003 Ramji Singh, Son of Late Mohan Singh, resident of Vill. Baghi, P.S. Samastipur Mufassil, Distt. Samastipur, Bihar, presently resident of Mohalla-Bhubeneshwar Bagh, Dargah, P.O. & P.S. Mahendru, Distt. Patna, Bihar. Petitioner -V e r s u s- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Secretary, Water Resources Department, Jharkhand, Ranchi.3. Chief Engineer, Design Advance Planning Hydrolic Circle, Ranchi.4. Superintending Engineer, Design Advance Planning Hydrolic Circle, Ranchi.5. Executive Engineer, Design Advance Planning Hydrolic Circle, Ranchi.6. The State of Bihar through Secretary, Water Resources Department, Bihar, Patna. Respondents CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK. For the Petitioner : - Mr. Sameer Saurabh, Advocate. For the Respondent-State of Jharkhand : - Mr. Rakesh Kumar Shahi, J.C. to A.A.G. For the Respondent-State of Bihar : - Mr. Pankaj Kumar, J.C. to Mr. S.P. Roy, (G.A., Bihar). 09/12.12.2017 In...


Dec 12 2017

Parijat Vyapar Private Limited Vs. Surinder Kumar Singh

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Dec-12-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No.5776 of 2010 --- 1. Parijat Vyapar Private Limited, through its constituted Attorney Shri Ved Nath Banerjea son of Late Biswanath Banerjea, having Office at 5th Floor, 12A, Netaji Subhas Road, P.O. G.P.O., Police Station Hare Street, Town and District Kolkata (West Bengal) 2. Mahesh Kumar Kejriwal son of Shri Murari Mohan Kejriwal at 5 th Floor, 12A, Netaji Subhas Road, P.O. G.P.O., Police Station Hare Street, Town & District Kolkata (West Bengal) .... ...... Petitioners Versus 1. J.Khan son of not known to the petitioner, resident of 1/1/H/7, Bengali Shah Warsi Road, P.O. Kidderpore, P.S. Kidderpore, Town & District Kolkata (West Bengal) 2. Surinder Kumar Singh son of not known to the petitioner, resident of Near Maharaja Hotel, Radium Road, P.O. Kutchery, Police Station Lalpur, District Ranchi 3. Bankat Garodia son of not known to the petitioners, resident of 180, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Room No.2/19A, P.O. Burrabazar, P.S. Burrabaza...


Dec 12 2017

Ramji Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors.

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Dec-12-2017

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. W.P. (S) No. 3649 of 2003 Ramji Singh, Son of Late Mohan Singh, resident of Vill. Baghi, P.S. Samastipur Mufassil, Distt. Samastipur, Bihar, presently resident of Mohalla-Bhubeneshwar Bagh, Dargah, P.O. & P.S. Mahendru, Distt. Patna, Bihar. Petitioner -V e r s u s- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Secretary, Water Resources Department, Jharkhand, Ranchi.3. Chief Engineer, Design Advance Planning Hydrolic Circle, Ranchi.4. Superintending Engineer, Design Advance Planning Hydrolic Circle, Ranchi.5. Executive Engineer, Design Advance Planning Hydrolic Circle, Ranchi.6. The State of Bihar through Secretary, Water Resources Department, Bihar, Patna. Respondents CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK. For the Petitioner : - Mr. Sameer Saurabh, Advocate. For the Respondent-State of Jharkhand : - Mr. Rakesh Kumar Shahi, J.C. to A.A.G. For the Respondent-State of Bihar : - Mr. Pankaj Kumar, J.C. to Mr. S.P. Roy, (G.A., Bihar). 09/12.12.2017 In...


Dec 12 2017

Baljit Singh Bedi Vs. The State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Dec-12-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 436 of 2017 Baljit Singh Bedi, S/o Late Swarn Singh ..... Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. . Opp. Party(s) _______ CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH ____ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhay Kr. Chaturvedy, Advocate Mr. Rajesh Kr. Singh, Sourav Kr., Advocate For the State : A.P.P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. A. K. Sahani, Advocate ----- C.A.V. on 07.12.2017. Pronounced on 12.12.2017 .1. The instant application for anticipatory bail filed on behalf of the petitioner, Baljit Singh Bedi has been pressed.2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel for the informant/ O.P. No.2 as well as learned counsel for the State.3. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No.312 of 2015 (dated 24.08.2015) corresponding to G.R. No.3679 of 2015, lodged under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of learned C.J.M., Ramgarh.4. ...


Dec 12 2017

Marut Nandan Singh Vs. The Union of India Through the Secretary Posts ...

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Dec-12-2017

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.3577 of 2017 Marut Nandan Singh --- --- Petitioner Versus 1. The Union of India through the Secretary (Posts) & chairman, Postal Service Board, Ministry of Communication and Information Technology, Department of Posts, New Delhi.2. The Chief Postmaster General, Jharkhand Circle, Ranchi 3. The Director of Postal Service, Jharkhand Circle, Ranchi 4. The Assistant Director of Postal Services (Personnel), Jharkhand Circle, Ranchi 5. The Postmaster General (PMG) Jharkhand Circle, Ranchi --- --- Respondents --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.B. MANGALMURTI For the Appellant : Mr. Ashutosh Anand, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Rajiv Sinha, ASGI : Mr. B.K.Prasad, Advocate 05/12.12.2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. The applicant in O.A. No.051/00095/2014 is aggrieved by the order dated 10th January, 2017 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal rejecting the Original Applica...


Dec 12 2017

Bachpan Bachao andolan Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Dec-12-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (PIL) No. 139 of 2011 --- Bachpan Bachao Andolan --- ---- Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others --- --- Respondents --- CORAM:The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh The Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.B. Mangalmurti For the Petitioner:M/s Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Amit Kr. Tiwari, Advocates For the Resp State: Mr. Rajiv Ranjan Mishra, GP-II, Arbind Kumar, JC to GP-II For the Resp UOI: Mr. B.K. Prasad, JC to ASGI -- 49/ 12.12.2017 The Respondent Principal Secretary, Department of Women and Child Development & Social Security, Government of Jharkhand has filed a supplementary counter affidavit on 06.12.2017 after our previous order dated 13.11.2017. This affidavit by and large intends to address the entire issues relating to protection of child rights through strategic intervention at three stages; (i) Preventive (ii) Rehabilitative and (iii) Re-integrative.2. Preventive Strategy (i) Under the Preventive Strategy, 22,745 Village Child Pro...


Dec 12 2017

Md Rahimuddin Ansari and Ors Vs. Home Department

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Dec-12-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No.4210 of 2014 =============================================================== 1. Md. Rahimuddin Ansari.2. Md. Gayasuddin Ansari.3. Md. Sohail Akhter.4. Iliyas Ansari.5. Md. Shafique Anwer.6. Nasih Alam.7. Md. Arfeen. Petitioners VERSUS1 The State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi.2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi.3. The Principal Secretary, Personnel, Administrative Reforms & Rajbhasa Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi.4. State of Bihar through its Chief Secretary, New Secretariat, Patna.5. The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.6. The Principal Secretary, Personnel, Administrative Reforms & Rajbhasa Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.7. Union of India through the Secretary, Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms & Training, Govt. of India, New Delhi. ... Respondents. ==================================================...


Dec 11 2017

Habil Topno Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Dec-11-2017

-1- Criminal (Jail) Appeal (D.B.) No. 1436 of 2006 (Against the Judgment of conviction and Order of sentence dated 13.04.2006, passed by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Chaibasa, in S.T. No. 100 of 2005.) Habil Topno ..... Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Respondent ------ For the Appellant : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Amicus Curiae For the State : Mr. Nagmani Tiwari, A.P.P. ------ PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ By Court.:- Heard learned amicus curiae for the appellant and learned counsel for the State.2. This jail appeal is directed against the Judgment of conviction and Order of sentence dated 13.04.2006, passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, West Singhbhum at Chaibasa, in S.T. No. 100 of 2005, whereby, the sole appellant has been found guilty and convicted for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, for committing the murder of his wife. Upon hearing on the point of sentence, the sole appell...


Dec 11 2017

Ashok Kumar Singh Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Dec-11-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Acquittal Appeal (DB) No. 17 of 2017 with I. A. No. 6844 of 2017 Ashok Kumar Singh ..... Appellant Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Ved Prakash Singh 3. Prem Prakash Singh 4. Bhagwan Yadav 5. Jai Prakash Singh .. Respondents -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Appellant : Mr. Yogesh Modi, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Sadhna Kumar, A.P.P. For the Respondents 2 to 5 : Mr. Mahesh Tiwary, Advocate -------- 7/ 11.12.2017 Heard learned counsel for the informant appellant, learned counsel for the State, as also learned counsel for the private respondents Nos. 2 to 5.2. The informant appellant is aggrieved by the Judgment dated 20.5.2017, passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge-XII, Dhanbad, in S. T. No. 146 of 2006, whereby, the accused respondents Nos. 2 to 5, who were facing the trial for the offences under Sections 147, 324, 307 / 149 of the Indian Penal Code, have been acq...


Dec 11 2017

Kishun Mahto Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Dec-11-2017

-1- Cr. Appeal (DB) No.565 of 2006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 565 of 2006 (Against the Judgment of conviction dated 07.03.2006 and Order of sentence dated 10.03.2006 passed by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Bermo at Tenughat, in S.T. No. 145 of 2001) Kishun Mahto ... Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Respondent PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY .. For the Appellants : Mr. Mahesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, APP .. By Court.:- Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Addl. P.P. for the State.2. The appellant is aggrieved by Judgment of conviction dated 07.03.2006 and Order of sentence dated 10.03.2006, passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Bermo at Tenughat, in S.T. No. 145 of 2001, whereby, the sole appellant has been found guilty and convicted for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. Upon hearing on the point of ...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial