Jharkhand Court December 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mukul Bhagat Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2017
Cr. Revision No. 145 of 2005 --------- Against the judgment dated 11.10.2004 passed in Cr. Appeal No. 07/2001 by the learned Additional Judicial Commissioner, F.T.C.-Xth, Ranchi, affirming the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 19.12.2000 (sentence pronounced on 20.12.2000) passed by the learned I st Assistant Sessions Judge, Ranchi in S.T. No. 344/1991, corresponding to G.R. Case No. 2492/1988, arising out of Kotwali P.S. Case No. 508/1988, (T.R. No. 77/1995), Trial No. 17/2000. --------- Mukul Bhagat, S/o Late Santosh Lal Bhagat, R/o Vishnu Talkies Lane, Old Commissioners Compound, P.S. Kotwali, District- Ranchi. ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. P.P.N. Roy, Sr. Advocate For the State : A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Prakash Chandra, Advocate --------- Present: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --------- By Court: Heard Mr. P.P.N. Roy, learned senior counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P....
Vinod Kumar Pal Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through Cbi
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-18-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7802 of 2017 ---- Vinod Kumar Pal son of late Ram Narayan Pal, resident of Daltangra, P.O. Kamre Tiril, P.S. Ratu, District Ranchi (Jharkhand). Petitioner -versus- The State of Jharkhand through C.B.I. Opposite Party ---- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN ---- For the Petitioner : Mr. Amit Kumar Das, Advocate For the Opp. Party (CBI): Mr. Kailash Prasad Deo, Advocate ---- ORDER RESERVED ON1212.2017 PRONOUNCED ON1812.2017 The petitioner is an accused for allegedly committing an offence punishable under Sections 120B, 511 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 7, 12 and 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) and 15 of the Prevention of Corruption Act.2. The allegations in the first information report is that one Tapas Kumar Dutta, Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Ranchi entered into a criminal conspiracy with other Income Tax Officers and other persons and thereafter transferred the Income Tax Files of several assesses from Kolkata to ...
Ranjit Kumar Lal Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through the Superintendent ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-18-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7287 of 2017 ---- Ranjit Kumar Lal @ Ranjeet Kumar Lal son of late Bindeshwari Prasad, resident of Mohalla New Sehdev Nagar, P.O. Hehal, P.S. Sukhdeonagar, District Ranchi-834005 (Jharkhand). Petitioner -versus- The State of Jharkhand through The Superintendent of Police, C.B.I., Ranchi Opposite Party ---- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN ---- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, Advocate For the Opp. Party (CBI): Mr. Kailash Prasad Deo, Advocate ---- ORDER RESERVED ON1212.2017 PRONOUNCED ON1812.2017 The petitioner is an accused for allegedly committing an offence punishable under Sections 120B, 511 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 7, 12 and 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.2. The allegations in the first information report is that one Tapas Kumar Dutta, Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Ranchi entered into a criminal conspiracy with other Income Tax Officers and other persons and t...
Ranvijay Narayan Singh and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through Its ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-18-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Civil Review Case No. 93 of 2013 [Arising out of C.W.J.C. No. 3079 of 1997 (P)] 1. Ranvijay Narayan Singh, son of Late Jai Narayan Singh; 2. Sachidanand Sharma, son of Jagdish Sharma; 3. Umakant Sharma, son of Late Baidya Nath Sharma; 4. Sukumar Sen, son of Birendra Kumar Sen; 5. Badri Prasad Sah, son of Jagdish Prasad Sah; 6. Md. Mahi Uddin Ansari, son of Md. Nasiruddin. ... ...Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through its Secretary, Human Resources Development, Nepal House, Ranchi 2. Director, Primary Education, Government of Jharkhand, Nepal House, Ranchi 3. District Superintendent of Education, Dumka. 4. District Superintendent of Education, Deoghar; Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S. N. PATHAK For Petitioner : Mr. Shresth Gautam, Advocate. For the State: Mr. Pratyush Lala, J.C. to GPIV C.A.V. On 13/07/2017 Pronounced on 18/12/2017 Dr. S.N.Pathak, J.Heard learned counsel for the part...
Dr Chaitraya Kumar Singh Vs. Welfare
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-18-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 1898 of 2017 Dr. Chaitraya Kumar Singh, son of Dr. Hazari Singh, resident of Village- Sanjhauli, P.O.- Sanjhauli, District- Rohtas (Bihar), presently residing at Mohalla- Odga, P.O.- Odga, P.S.- Jaldega, District- Simdega Petitioner VERSUS1 The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary/Principal Secretary, Welfare Department, having office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S.- Dhurwa, Town and District- Ranchi.2. The Secretary/Principal Secretary, Welfare Department, Government of Jharkhand, having office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S.- Dhurwa, Town and District- Ranchi.3. The State of Bihar, through its Secretary/Principal Secretary, Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Welfare Department, having office at Old Secretariat, Bailey Road, P.O. & P.S.- Bailey Road, Town and District- Patna (Bihar).4. Under Secretary to the Government, Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, having of...
Tarun Roy Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through the Superintendent of Pol ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-18-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7390 of 2017 ---- Tarun Roy son of late Ram Swaroop Roy, resident of Sukhdeo Nagar, Near Akhil Memorial School, Ratu Road, P.O. Hehal, P.S. Sukhdeo Nagar, District Ranchi-834005(Jharkhand). Petitioner -versus- The State of Jharkhand through The Superintendent of Police, C.B.I., Ranchi Opposite Party ---- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN ---- For the Petitioner : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Sr. Advocate Mr. Abhishek Sinha, Advocate For the Opp. Party (CBI): Mr. Kailash Prasad Deo, Advocate ---- ORDER RESERVED ON1212.2017 PRONOUNCED ON1812.2017 The petitioner is an accused for allegedly committing an offence punishable under Sections 120B, 511 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 7, 12 and 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) and 15 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.2. The allegations in the first information report is that one Tapas Kumar Dutta, Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Ranchi entered into a criminal conspiracy with oth...
Santosh Shah Alias Santosh Chowdhury Vs. Union of India Through the Ce ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-18-2017
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7351 of 2017 Santosh Shah @ Santosh Chowdhury............... Petitioner Versus Union of India through Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). Opp. Party Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ananda Sen For the Petitioner : Mr. R.S.Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate Mr. Kumar Vaibhav, Advocate For the CBI : Mr. K.P.Deo, Advocate ORDER C.A.V. On 12/12/2017 Delivered On 18/12/2017 07/18.12.2017 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel for the CBI.2. The petitioner is an accused for allegedly committing offence punishable under Section 120B & 511 of the Indian Penal Code, Section , 7, 12, 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act in connection with R.C. AC1 2017 A0003(RC3A)/2017 D), pending in the Court of Special Judge, CBI, Ranchi.3. The allegation in the First Information Report is that one Tapas Kumar Dutta, Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Ranchi entered into a criminal conspiracy with other Income Tax of...
Sunil Kumar Gupta Vs. Union of India Through the Central Bureau of Inv ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-18-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8699 of 2017 ---- Sunil Kumar Gupta son of late Ram Babu Gupta, resident of Plot No.7, Poornima (Riverside) Kadru, P.O. and P.S. Argora, District Ranchi. Petitioner -versus- Union of India through the Central Bureau Of Investigation (CBI) Opposite Party ---- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN ---- For the Petitioner : Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate Mr. Nishant Kumar Roy, Advocate For the Opp. Party (CBI): Mr. Kailash Prasad Deo, Advocate ---- ORDER RESERVED ON1212.2017 PRONOUNCED ON1812.2017 The petitioner is an accused for allegedly committing an offence punishable under Sections 120B, 511 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 7, 12 and 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) and 15 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.2. The allegations in the first information report is that one Tapas Kumar Dutta, Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Ranchi entered into a criminal conspiracy with other Income Tax Officers and other persons and th...
Sujoy Ghosh Dastidar Vs. Dayita Ghosh Dastidar
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-18-2017
1 First Appeal No. 161 of 2011 ------ [An application under Section 28(1) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 read with Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984] Sujoy Ghosh Dastidar .... .... . Appellant Versus Dayita Ghosh Dastidar .... .... .... Respondent For the Appellant : Mr. Rajivnandan Sahay, Sr. Advocate Mr. Yashvardhan, Advocate Mr. S.P. Mehta, Advocate Mr. Binod Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent : PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.B. MANGALMURTI By Court Heard learned counsel for the appellant.2. The respondent has not appeared despite service of notice on three occasions. It is pertinent to mention here that the Matrimonial Suit No.406 of 2010 instituted by the husband/appellant herein was decided ex-parte as despite service of notice including through paper publication, the respondent did not appear to contest the suit as per the order dated 18th July, 2011 passed by the court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Jamshedpur.3. The app...
Smt Kanti Mishra Vs. Human Resource Development
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-18-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No.7555 of 2012 =============================================================== Smt. Kanti Mishra, wife of S.P. Sharma, resident of Plot No. 5, Central Market, Sector- VI, Bokaro Steel City, P.O. & P.S. Bokaro Steel City, District Bokaro. Petitioner VERSUS1 The State of Jharkhand.2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi.3. The Joint Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi.4. The Director, Higher Education, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi.5. Vinoba Bhave University through the Registrar, P.O. & District Hazaribagh 6. The Vice-Chancellor, Vinoba Bhave University, Hazaribagh, P.O. & District Hazaribagh. ... Respondents. =============================================================== For Petitioner : Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Sr. Advocate Mr. Rakesh Kumar Shahi, Advocate Mr. Gourav Abhishek, Advocate For Respondent-State...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »