Jharkhand Court December 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Jitan Marandi Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-02-2017
1 Criminal Appeal (D.B.) No. 271 of 2015 ----- (Against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 01.04.2015 passed by the then Additional Sessions Judge-V, Giridih in Sessions Trial No. 462 of 2005) ----- Jitan Marandi, son of Muchu Marandi, Resident of village-Badki Kumhria, PO & PS-Bengabad, District-Giridih .... Appellant -Versus- The State of Jharkhand .... Respondent ------ For the Appellant : Mr. Shree Nivas Roy, Advocate For the State : Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, APP ------ P R E S E N T HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RATNAKER BHENGRA ----- Per, S. Chandrashekhar, J: Aggrieved of judgment of conviction and sentence, both dated 01.04.2015 passed in Sessions Trial No. 462 of 2005, the appellant has preferred the present Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 271 of 2015 under section 374(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure.2. The prosecution case unfolds in the fardbeyan of Sukra Marandi who is father of the deceased-Budhni Devi. He has stated before the Off...
Ramu Pahan Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-02-2017
1 Cr. Appeal (DB) No.1477 of 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 1477 of 2007 (Against the Judgment of conviction dated 11 th July 2007 and Order of sentence dated 12th July 2007, passed by the Additional Judicial Commissioner, Fast Track Court, Khunti, in S.T. No. 558 of 2003. Ramu Pahan . Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Respondent PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY .. For the Appellant : Mr. Yogeshwar Modi, Amicus Curiae For the State : APP .. By Court.:- Heard learned amicus curiae, appointed by the Court for the appellant and learned counsel for the State.2. The appellant is aggrieved by the Judgment of conviction dated 11 th July 2007 and Order of sentence dated 12th July 2007, passed by the learned Addl. Judicial Commissioner, Fast Track Court, Khunti, in S.T. No. 558 of 2003, whereby, the sole appellant has been found guilty and convicted for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Pena...
Lukhi Ram Murmu Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-02-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Jail Appeal (DB) No. 143 of 2010 (Against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence both dated 27.11.2009 passed by the then 1 st Additional Sessions Judge, Dumka in Sessions Case No. 25 of 2008) Lukhiram Murmu son of Late Raja Murmu, resident of Village -Bhuski Dangal, Police Station- Gopikandar, District-Dumka ( Jharkhand) .....Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Respondent For the Appellant: Ms. Amrita Banerjee, Advocate For the Respondent: Mr. Satish Kumar Keshri,APP PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RATNAKER BHENGRA Per, S. Chandrashekhar: This Jail Appeal is preferred against judgment of conviction u/s 302 IPC and order of sentence, both dated 27.11.2009 passed in Sessions Case No. 25 of 2008 by the then 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Dumka. The appellant has been sentenced to undergo R.I. for life and fine of Rs. 5000/-.2. At the outset it needs to be recorded that the p...
Manesh Mahto Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-02-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal (Jail) Appeal (D.B.) No. 466 of 2009 (Against the Judgment of conviction dated 17.06.2008 and Order of sentence dated 21.06.2008, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. III, Hazaribagh, in S.T. No. 468 of 2004.) Manesh Mahto ..... Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Respondent -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Appellant : Md. Zaid Ahmad, Amicus Curie. For the respondent-State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, A.P.P. -------- By Court.:- Heard learned amicus curiae for the appellant appointed by the Court, and learned counsel for the State.2. The appellant is aggrieved by the Judgment of conviction dated 17.06.2008 and Order of sentence dated 21.06.2008, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. III, Hazaribagh, in S.T. No. 468 of 2004, whereby, the sole appellant has been found guilty and convicted for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian ...
National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Prabha Neel Sushma Kindo and Or ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-01-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI M.A. No. 192 of 2015 ------- National Insurance Company Ltd. ..Appellant -Versus- 1. Prabha Neel Sushma Kindo 2. Deepti Toppo 3. Priti Lalta Toppo 4. Ranjan Kumar Singh . Respondents ------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------- For the Appellant : M/s. Alok Lal For the Respondents : M/s. Ashutosh Anand ------- 6/ 01.12.2017. Heard learned counsel for the appellant National Insurance Company Ltd., and learned counsel for the claimant respondents Nos. 1 to 3. The owner of the vehicle, respondent No.4 had refused to accept the notice issued by this Court, which was deemed to be validly served upon him. Even before the Motor Vehicles Accident Claim Tribunal, Ranchi, the owner, respondent No.4 had not appeared in spite of notice and the Tribunal had proceeded ex-parte as against the respondent No.4 herein.2. The appellant National Insurance Company Ltd., (herein after referred to as the 'Insurance Company), has challenged the Judgment dated ...
Manoranjan Prasad Sinha Vs. Managing Committee of Vivekanand Vidhya Ma ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-01-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.C.(S.B.) Case No. 9 of 2016 With I.A. No. 5002 of 2017 Manoranjan Prasad Sinha Appellant Versus Managing Committee of Vivekanand Vidhya Mandir through its Secretary, P.S. Jagarnathpur, Ranchi Respondent -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA -------- For the Appellant : : Mr. Manoranjan Pd. Sinha (In Person) For the Respondent : : M/s. Bhola Nath Ojha -------- C.A.V. on 24.11.2017 Pronounced on 01.12.2017 H.C. Mishra, J.: Heard the appellant, Manoranjan Prasad Sinha, in person and the learned counsel for the respondent Managing Committee of Vivekanand Vidhya Mandir.2. The appellant had filed this appeal initially challenging the order dated 25.11.2016, passed by the Jharkhand Education Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the 'Tribunal') in Review Case No. 02 of 2016 (JET) whereby, the said review petition, which was directed against the order dated 07.04.2016 passed by the Tribunal in Case No. 12 of 2010 (JET), has been dismisse...
Haru Bauri Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-01-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Appeal (D.B.) No. 834 of 2013 With I.A. No. 8761 of 2017 (Against the Judgment of conviction and Order of sentence dated 27 th May, 2009, passed by the 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Dhanbad, in S.T. No. 351 of 2004.) Haru Bauri ..... Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Respondent -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Appellant : M/s. Lukesh Kumar, Advocate. For the respondent-State : Mr. S.K. Sharma, A.P.P. -------- By Court.:- Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the State.2. The appellant is aggrieved by the Judgment of conviction and Order of sentence dated 27th May 2009, passed by the learned 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Dhanbad, in S.T. No. 351 of 2004, whereby, the sole appellant has been found guilty and convicted for the offences under Sections 302, 328, 201 of the Indian Penal Code. Upon hearing on the point of sentence,...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›