Jharkhand Court January 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mahabir Singh and Anr Vs. Human Resource Development
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-20-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 2785 of 2013 1. Mahabir Singh, S/o Late Bidya Dhar Singh, Resident of Mahuda, P.O.- Silphore, P.S.-Pindrajora, District:-Bokaro, Jharkhand.2. Ganga Dhar Mahato, S/o Late Kunj Bihari Mahato, Resident of Village:- Sonabad, P.O.-Ghatiayali, P.S.-Pindrajora, District:-Bokaro, Jharkhand. .... Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, P.O. +P.S.-Dhurwa, Ranchi.2. The Director, Primary Education, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, P.O.+P.S.-Dhurwa, Ranchi.3. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, District Establishment Committee, Bokaro, P.O.+P.S.& District:-Bokaro.4. The District Superintendent of Education, P.O.+P.S.& District:-Bokaro, Jharkhand. .... Respondents --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Rupesh Singh, Advocate For the Re...
Ram Dayal Mahto and Ors Vs. Personnel and Adminis Reform
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-20-2017
1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 5918 of 2014 --- 1.Ram Dayal Mahto, son of Mukhwa Mahto, resident of village Porahat (Chinikuti), P.O. & P.S. Sonua, District-West Singhbhum 2.Basudeo Gope, son of Late Bihari Gope, resident of Village Lupudih, P.O. & P.S. Chandil, District-Seraikela Kharsawan 3.Somlal Sundi, son of Damu Sundi, resident of village Kurjuli, P.O. Nakti, P.S. Keraikela, District-West Singhbhum 4.Shiv Shankar Mahato, son of Khageshwar Mahato, resident of Village Naranga, P.O. & P.S. Sonua, District West Singhbhum 5.Anil Bodra, son of Muhan Bodra, resident of Village Bhalay Kuder, P.O. & P.S. Chakradharpur, District- Singhbhum West. 6.Saru Purty, son of late Laxman Purty, Resident of village Raigara, P.O. Tebo, P.S. Sonua, District-Singhbhum West 7.Shravan Nayak, son of Kirtan Nayak, resident of Banglatanr, Ddhatkidih, P.O. & P.S. Chakradharpur, District West Singhbhum 8.Ajit Mundri, son of Abhiram Mundri, resident of Meromgutu, P.O. & P.S. Bandgaon, Dis...
Rambali Das and Anr Vs. Personnel and Adminis Reform
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-20-2017
1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI --- W.P.(S) No. 2551 of 2015 --- 1.Rambali Das, son of late Jagdish Das, resident of Village-Rupaspur, P.O.- Dhanuki, P.S. -Sarmera, District-Nalanda (Bihar), at present Residing at Bundu Block Road, P.O. +P.S.-Bundi, District-Ranchi 2.Upendra Sharma, son of late Bholi Sharma, Resident of C/o Ramchandra Sharma (Pan Gumti), Beside Doranda Post Office, P.O. and P.S. -Doranda, District-Ranchi ..... Petitioner --Versus-- 1.The State of Jharkhand, through the Chief Secretary, Personnel Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O. and P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi 2.The Principal Secretary, Department of Forest, Government of Jharkhand, Nepal House, Doranda, P.O. + P.S. Doranda, District-Ranchi 3.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Jharkhand, Ranchi P.O. ad P.S. -Doranda, District-Ranchi 4.The Regional Chief Conservator of Forest, Jharkhand, Ranchi P.O. and P.S. Doranda, District-Ranch...
Mithu Yadav Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-19-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 6953 of 2016 with B.A. No.6740 of 2016 ----- Mithu Yadav. ..... Petitioner [In B.A. No.6953/2016] Madan Yadav. ..... Petitioner [In B.A. No.6740/2016] ----- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate For the Opp. Party : A.P.P. 07/19.01.2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioners are accused in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 376(2) (g), 376(D) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case and have not committed any offence as alleged by the informant in the F.I.R. The alleged occurrence took place in the wee hours of 11.03.2016 (02:30-03:45 a.m). The informant, who happens to be the father of victim, has allegedly recorded his fardbeyan under the instruction of the victim girl. As per the said fardbeyan, the petitioner in B.A. No.6953...
Madan Yadav Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-19-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 6953 of 2016 with B.A. No.6740 of 2016 ----- Mithu Yadav. ..... Petitioner [In B.A. No.6953/2016] Madan Yadav. ..... Petitioner [In B.A. No.6740/2016] ----- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate For the Opp. Party : A.P.P. 07/19.01.2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioners are accused in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 376(2) (g), 376(D) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case and have not committed any offence as alleged by the informant in the F.I.R. The alleged occurrence took place in the wee hours of 11.03.2016 (02:30-03:45 a.m). The informant, who happens to be the father of victim, has allegedly recorded his fardbeyan under the instruction of the victim girl. As per the said fardbeyan, the petitioner in B.A. No.6953...
Ajit Kumar Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-19-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 89 of 2005 --- Ajit Kumar Singh son of Brindaban Singh resident of Sector III B, Chakki More, Plot No. B-1 Shopping Centre, PS B. S. City, District - Bokaro Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Sushil Kumar Khakha, Senior Manager, Punbaj National Bank, Sector I, PS B. S. City, Bokaro Opposite Parties --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjeev Thakur, Advocate For the Opposite Parties : None --- 6/19.01.2017 Heard Mr. Sanjeev Thakur, learned counsel for the petitioner. No one appears for the opposite parties.2. In this application the petitioner has prayed for quashing the entire criminal proceeding in connection with B. S. City P. S. Case No. 208 of 2004 corresponding to G. R. No. 853 of 2004 including the order dated 25.10.2004 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st class, Bokaro whereby and whereunder cognizance has been taken for the offence pu...
Abhishek Kumar Vs. National Building Construction Corporation Limited ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-19-2017
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 1710 of 2016 Abhishek Kumar ..... Petitioner Versus 1. National Building Construction Corporation Limited, through its Chairman-cum-Managing Director, New Delhi.2. Executive Director (HRM), National Building Construction Corporation Limited, New Delhi.3. Assistant General Manager, National Building Construction Corporation Limited, Zonal Office, Ranchi. .. Respondents -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S.N. PATHAK ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Siddhartha Ranjan, Advocate. For the respondent-NBCC : Mrs. Banani Verma, Advocate. -------- 05/ 19.01.2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent National Building Construction Corporation Limited.2. The National Building Construction Corporation Limited (hereinafter referred to as the 'NBCC'), published an advertisement in the Employment News dated 23-29 September 2006, inviting applications for different...
Ashok Kumar Vs. State of Jharkhand Co Operative Department
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-19-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 1476 of 2008 Ashok Kumar S/o Late Subuk Mahto, resident of Lakasmipur Mohalla, Madhepura, P.O., P.S. & District-Madhepura (Bihar). .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand (Co-operative Department).2. Secretary, Co-Operative Department, Jharkhand, Ranchi.3. Joint Secretary, Co-Operative Department, Jharkhand, Ranchi ... Respondents ----- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK --- For the Petitioner : Mr. P. A. S. Pati, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Jayant Franklin Toppo, S.C (L & C) ----- 13/19.01.2017 In the instant writ application, the petitioner has inter-alia prayed for quashing the order of dismissal dated 17.01.2008 issued by the Joint Secretary, Co-operative Department, Jharkhand, Ranchi and also for direction to the respondents to regularize the period of absence by granting leave on medical ground and other leave as may be permissible.2. The facts as emanated in the writ application, is that initially the...
Prem Sao Alias Prem and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-19-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No. 1172 of 2015 1. Prem Sao @ Prem 2. Arbind Sharma 3. Kalyan Roy .... Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Ravindra Sao Opposite Parties With Cr. M.P. No. 1175 of 2015 1. D. K. Vyas @ Devendra Vyas 2. Manish Jhunjhunwala .... Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Ravindra Sao Opposite Parties --- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Bharat Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Mukesh Kumar, A.P.P. (In Cr.M.P.1172 of 2015) & Mr. Rajesh Kumar Mishra, A.P.P. (In Cr.M.P.1175 of 2015) For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Ram Lakhan Yadav Order No. 04 Dated 19th January, 2017 1. Both the matters are being heard and disposed of together since the same arises out of Complaint Case No. 121 of 2015.2. Heard Mr. Bharat Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, learned APP appearing for the State and Mr. Ram Lakhan Yadav, learned counsel for the opposite party No.2. 3. In this applicatio...
D K Vyas Alias Devendra Vyas and Anr Vs. The State of Jharkhand and An ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-19-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No. 1172 of 2015 1. Prem Sao @ Prem 2. Arbind Sharma 3. Kalyan Roy .... Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Ravindra Sao Opposite Parties With Cr. M.P. No. 1175 of 2015 1. D. K. Vyas @ Devendra Vyas 2. Manish Jhunjhunwala .... Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Ravindra Sao Opposite Parties --- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Bharat Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Mukesh Kumar, A.P.P. (In Cr.M.P.1172 of 2015) & Mr. Rajesh Kumar Mishra, A.P.P. (In Cr.M.P.1175 of 2015) For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Ram Lakhan Yadav Order No. 04 Dated 19th January, 2017 1. Both the matters are being heard and disposed of together since the same arises out of Complaint Case No. 121 of 2015.2. Heard Mr. Bharat Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, learned APP appearing for the State and Mr. Ram Lakhan Yadav, learned counsel for the opposite party No.2. 3. In this applicatio...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »