Jharkhand Court January 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Birendra Kumar Sinha Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-05-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 6501 of 2011 ------- Birendra Kumar Sinha, son of Late Jag Bahadur Sinha, resident of Kitadih, P.O-Kitadih, P.S. Persadih, Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Jharkhand through its Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, H.E.C. Compound, P.O and P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. 2.The Secretary, Rural Works Department, Government of Jharkhand, F.F.P. Building, H.E.C Compound, Dhurwa, P.O & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. 3.The Divisional Commissioner, Singhbhum (Kolhan), Division, Chaibasa Officiating from Chaibasa, P.O and P.S. Chaibasa, District West Singhbhum. 4.The Engineer-in-Chief-cum-Special Secretary, Rural Works Department, Government of Jharkhand, F.F.P. Building, H.E.C Compound, Dhurwa, P.O & P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi. 5.The Superintending Engineer, Rural Works Department, Work Circle, Chaibasa, Officiating from Chaibasa, P.O and P.S. Chaibasa, District West Singhbhum. 6...
Electrosteel Steels Limited Through Its Director Rama Shankar Singh Vs ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-05-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 2340 of 2016 --- Electrosteel Steels Limited --- --- ---- Petitioner Versus 1. The Divisional Forest Officer, Bokaro, Bokaro Division 2. The Range Officer, Bokaro Division, Bokaro 3. Shri Kailash Pati Mahatha 4. Shri Hari Pada Mahatha 5. The Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand 6. The Secretary, Forest Department, Government of Jharkhand 7. The Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro --- --- --- Respondents --- CORAM:The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitioner: Mr. Indrajit Sinha and Mr. Bibhash Sinha, Advocates For the Resp State: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, GP-V For the Resp No. 3: Mr. Rahul Kr. Gupta, Advocate --- 08/ 05.01.2017 Heard counsel for the parties.2. Petitioner herein has been impleaded as Respondent No. 7 in Title Appeal No. 33/07 before the Court of Principal District Judge, Bokaro on account of the application moved by the appellant due to passing of the decretal interest of the plaintiff / decree holder / Responde...
Ravi Shankar Kumar Rishi Vs. The State of Jhakrhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-05-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 396 of 2016 ------- Santosh Kumar Singh(Police No.788) son of Sri Rajkeshwar Singh, resident of village Sikki Kala, P.o. & P.S. Patan, District: Palamau, Jharkhand ... Petitioner with W.P.(S) No.719 of 2016 Ravi Shankar Kumar Rishi(Police No.773), son of Sri Jattu Ram, resident of village-Kelhar, P.O. & P.S. Patan, District-Palamau, Jharkhand Versus (IN BOTH CASES) 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.The Director General and Inspector General of Police, Jharkhand, Project Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi 3.The Deputy Inspector General of Police(Training)-cum-Principal P.T.C., Hazaribagh, P.O. & P.S. Patma, District-Hazaribagh. 4.Superintendent of Police, Latehar, P.O. & P.S. Latehar, District-Latehar. 5.The Commandant, J.A.P. 6, Jamshedpur , P.O. & P.S. Jamshedpur, Distirict- East Singhbhum. ... Respondents ------ CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK ------ (in both cases) For the Petitioner: Mr. Suresh Kumar, Advocate For t...
Sunil Pandey Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through Secretary Department o ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-05-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI W.P.(PIL) No. 1262 of 2014 With I.A. No. 758 of 2016 With I.A. No. 2350 of 2016 Sushil Kumar Pandey, son of Sri Bishram Pandey, resident of village Tona, PO Bhandara, PS- Bishrampur, Dist. Palamau. ..Petitioner VERSUS1 The State of Jharkhand through Secretary, Department of Home, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi; 2. Director General of Police, Jharkhand, Ranchi; 3. Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Home, New Delhi; 4. Director, Central Bureau of Investigation, New Delhi; 5. National Investigating Agency, 6th/7th Floor, NDCC-II Building, Jai Singh Road, New Delhi, through its Director General. .Respondents --- CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. PATEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RATNAKER BHENGRA --- For the Petitioner : Mr. D.K. Chakraverty, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Jai Prakash, A.A.G.; Mr. Rishi Pallava, J.C. to A.A.G.; Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Sr. Advocate. --- 17/ Dated 05.01.2017: (Oral Order) Per D.N.Patel, J.1. This writ petition has earlier ...
Thakur Hansda Vs. Mukhodi Hembram and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-04-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 3828 of 2008 Thakur Hansda .... Petitioner Vrs.1. Mukhodi Hembram 2. Dale Hasda ..... Respondents .... CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Kaushik Sharkel For the Respondents : Mr. Nityanand Prasad Choudhary 09/04.01.2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Execution Case No. 6/2007 was being prosecuted by the Respondents who were the decree holders of the Title (Partition) Suit No. 28/1994 vide judgment dated 27.5.2005 and final decree dated 22.2.2007. Petitioner herein filed an application under Order 21 Rule 97 of the Civil Procedure Code taking an objection to the execution of the decree. Petitioner claimed that his natural father namely Sarju Hasda had given him in adoption to Dashrath Hasda. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that averment recorded in the opening paragraph of the impugned judgment suffers from error on record on that score where it has been erroneously re...
Ravan Rai Vs. State of Bihar
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-04-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal No.471 of 1992 (D.B.) 1. Ravan Roy.2. Newani Roy. ... Appellants Versus The State of Bihar. ... Respondent -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE Dr. S.N. PATHAK ------- For the Appellant : Mrs. Mahua Palit, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Nag Mani Tiwari, Advocate. -------- 08/ 04.01.2017 Heard the learned Counsel for the appellant and the learned Counsel for the State.2. The appellant Newani Roy is reported to be dead and his death certificate has also been brought on record. Accordingly, the appeal abates as against appellant No.2-Newani Roy.3. The appellant Ravan Roy is aggrieved by the Judgment of conviction dated 27.11.1992 and Order of sentence dated 30.11.1992 passed by the learned 3rd Addl. Sessions Judge, Dumka, in S.C. No.154 of 1989, whereby the appellant has been convicted for the offence under Sections 147/458/325/326 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code and has been found guilty for the sa...
Tata Motors Limited Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-04-2017
1 W.P.(T) No.4279 of 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(T) No. 4279 of 2008 TATA MOTORS Limited, a Company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, having its corporate and registered office at 24, Homi Modi Street, Mumbai-1, and having its manufacturing unit at Jamshedpur, PO- GM Works, PS- Telco Colony, Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum, through its Divisional Manager, Finance Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand, through the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes-cum-Secretary, Commercial Taxes Department, Jharkhand 2. Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Appeal), Jamshedpur Division, Jamshedpur 3. Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Jamshedpur Circle, Jamshedpur 4. Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Bureau of Investigation, Jamshedpur Division, Jamshedpur ... ... ... Respondents ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. PATEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RATNAKER BHENGRA ----- For the Petitioner: M/s. Sumeet Gadodia, Advocate For the Respondents:...
Ms Tata Motors Limited Through Its Constituted Attorney Shri Praveen K ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-03-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 218 of 2015 M/s Tata Motors Ltd.(Presently known as Tata Engineering and Locomotive Company Ltd), Jamshedpur ... Petitioner -V e r s u s- Madumala Gabrial .... Respondent CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioners : - M/s V. P. Singh, Sr. Adv., A. K. Das & Rashmi Kumar & Pooja Kumari, Advs. For the Respondents :- 04/03.01.2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned Court of Additional Civil Judge (Jr. Div-XIII), Jamshedpur in Title Suit No. 73 of 2008 by the impugned order dated 17.11.2014, Annexure-5, rejected the petition of the petitioner herein dated 07.08.2014 for recall of its order fixing the suit for final argument and allow cross-examination of the witnesses of the plaintiff, who were discharged without any cross- examination. Defendant-petitioner has also sought to adduce evidence in support of his case. As the sequence of facts noticed from the records and the impugned order show t...
Abhay Kumar Singh and Ors Vs. Labour
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-03-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (L) No. 6691 of 2016 --- Abhay Kumar Singh --- --- ---- Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through its Commissioner cum - Registrar, Trade Union, Department of Labour 2. The Deputy Labour Commissioner, Jamshedpur 3. The Additional Registrar, Trade Union, Department of Labour, Government of Jharkhand 4. T.M.L. Drivelines Workers Union through its General Secretary--- Respondents with W.P.(L) No. 5275 of 2015 --- 1. Abhay Kumar Singh 2. Rajesh Patel 3. Satyendra Kumar Singh --- --- --- Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through its Secretary, Department of Labour 2. The Deputy Commissioner, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur 3. The Senior Superintendent of Police, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur 4. T.M.L. Drivelines Ltd. through its C.E.O.5. T.M.L. Drivelines Workers Union 6. Labour Commissioner cum Registrar, Trade Union, Government of Jharkhand --- --- --- Respondents CORAM:The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitio...
Abhay Kumar Singh Vs. Labour
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-03-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (L) No. 6691 of 2016 --- Abhay Kumar Singh --- --- ---- Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through its Commissioner cum - Registrar, Trade Union, Department of Labour 2. The Deputy Labour Commissioner, Jamshedpur 3. The Additional Registrar, Trade Union, Department of Labour, Government of Jharkhand 4. T.M.L. Drivelines Workers Union through its General Secretary--- Respondents with W.P.(L) No. 5275 of 2015 --- 1. Abhay Kumar Singh 2. Rajesh Patel 3. Satyendra Kumar Singh --- --- --- Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through its Secretary, Department of Labour 2. The Deputy Commissioner, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur 3. The Senior Superintendent of Police, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur 4. T.M.L. Drivelines Ltd. through its C.E.O.5. T.M.L. Drivelines Workers Union 6. Labour Commissioner cum Registrar, Trade Union, Government of Jharkhand --- --- --- Respondents CORAM:The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitio...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›