Jharkhand Court September 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr Rekha Roy and Ors Vs. Health
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-01-2016
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.5639 of 2015 1. Dr. Rekha Roy 2. Kumar Shailaj Prakash 3. Dr. Archana Singh 4. Dr. Geeta Mehta 5. Arvind Kumar 6. Pankaj Kumar Verma 7. Dr. Malti Kumari 8. Raj Kishore Munda 9. Dr. Sujit Kumar Mishra 10. Dr. Anjali Singh ..... Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand.2. The Director, RINPAS, Kanke, Ranchi.3. The Chairman, RINPAS-cum-Commissioner, South Chhotanagpur, Ranchi.4. The Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Medical Education and Family Welfare, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi. . Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioners : Mr. Sudershan Shrivastava, Advocate Mr. M.B. Lal, Advocate For the State : J.C. to AAG For the Respondent No.1 & 2 : Mr. Saurav Arun, Advocate ----- 4/1.09.2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the respondent State as also learned counsel for the Ranchi Institute of Neuro Psychiatry and Allied Sciences (hereinafter referred to as 'RINPAS').2. P...
Bhawa Nath Jha Vs. State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-01-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 2660 of 2007 Bhawa Nath Jha ..... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand.2. Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi.3. Special Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi.4. Dy. Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi.5. Engineer-in-Chief, Rural Engineering Organisation, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 6. Superintending Engineer, Rural Engineering Organisation, Works Division, Dumka.7. Executive Engineer, Rural Engineering Organisation, Works Division, Ranchi. .. Respondents. -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : M/s A.K. Mehta, Advocate & Nikhil Kumar Mehta, Advocate For the respondent-State : J.C. to SC-III. -------- 08/ 01.08.2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent State.2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the office order contained in memo No.691 d...
Shri Dwarkadas Jalan Memorial Public Charity Trust Reprr by Its Managi ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-01-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.3155 of 2015 ------ Shri Dwarkadas Jalan Memorial Public Charity Trust, a Public Trust having its office at Luby Circular Road, Dhanbad, P.O. & P.S.- Dhanbad, District-Dhanbad represented by its Managing Trustee- Bajrang Prasad Dalmia, Advocate, son of Late K.N. Dalmia, resident of Luby Circular Road, Dhanbad, P.O. & P.S.-Dhanbad, District- Dhanbad ... ... Petitioner Versus 1. Ramesh Kumar Jalan, son of Late Radhe Krishna Jalan, resident of Flat No.501, Skylark-B, 5th Floor, Lokhandwala, Andheri (W), Mumbai- 400 053 2. Bijay Kumar Jalan, son of late Radha Krishna Jalan, resident of Mumbai Sadguru Complex, 1-A-304, Gen. A.K. Vidya Marg, Film City Road, Goregaon (E), Mumbai- 400 063 3. Sajan Kumar Tulsyan 4. Ajay Kumar Tulsyan Nos.3 and 4, both sons of Late Om Prakash Tulsyan, residents of Rajbari Road, Jharia, P.O. & P.S. Jharia, District- Dhanbad ... ... ... Respondents ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI NATH VERMA For the Petiti...
Lallu Mistry and Ors Vs. Praduman Mistry and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-01-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI S.A.No.287 of 2003 Lallu Mistri & Ors. . Appellants Versus Praduman Mistri & Ors. .... Respondents --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA --------- For the Appellant : Mr. P.K.Deomani, advocate For the Respondents : None --------- 06/Dated:01. 09.2016 I.A.No. 666/16 with I.A. No. 665/16 Learned counsel for the appellants is in attendance, however on repeated calls none appeared on behalf of the respondents.2. The above interlocutory applications have been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act and under Order 22, Rules 3 & 9 of the C.P.C respectively for condoning the delay of 2998 days and for substituting the legal heirs/representatives of deceased appellant no.3, namely Radhe Mistry, who died on 20.08.2007 and for setting aside of the abatement.3. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that the appellants could not file the appropriate application on time, as they had no knowledge that the conducting lawyer, Mr. D...
Manish Biswas and Anr Vs. State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-01-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.1595 of 2010 --- Subodh Bara Babu @ Subodh Kumar Yadav.... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Yogmaya Sarkar Opposite Parties --- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Md. Sohail Anwar, Sr Advocate & Mr. Afaque Ahmad, Advocate For the State : Mr. Asif Kha, APP For the O.P. No. 2 : None --- Order No. 07 Dated 1st September, 2016 Heard Mr. M. S. Anwar, learned senior counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Asif Khan, learned counsel appearing for the State. No one has appeared on behalf of opposite party No.2. In this application, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the entire criminal proceeding in connection with Borio (J) P.S. Case No. 187 of 2009 (G.R. No. 448 of 2009) including the order dated 18.10.2010 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sahibganj, whereby and whereunder, cognizance has been taken for the offences punishable u/s 376 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned senior ...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›