Jharkhand Court August 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kalawati Devi Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-20-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI I.A. No. 7546 of 2013 In Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 965 of 2012 Kalawati Devi wife of Devendra Sahu, resident of Village Gudi, P.O. Irgaon, P.S. Kairo, DistrictLohardaga Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. PATEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA For the Appellant: Mr. Kaushik Sarkhel, Advocate For the Respondent: A.P.P. th 07/Dated: 20 August, 2016 Per D.N. Patel, J.1) The present interlocutory application has been preferred by the appellant under Section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for suspension of sentence awarded by the Sessions Judge, Lohardaga in S.T. No. 55 of 2003 whereby this appellant has been convicted mainly for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and punished for life imprisonment.2) We have heard the counsels for both sides an...
Ram Swarup Prasad and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-19-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 1675 of 2014 --- Ram Swarup Prasad & Ors. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & Anr. ... Opposite Parties --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. --- 14/19.08.2016 Mr. Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, has submitted a draft compromise petition in which certain terms and conditions have been enumerated. It has been submitted that certain other terms and conditions with respect to the payment of Rs. 12,00,000/- as well as the application under Section 13(b) of the Hindu Marriage Act which is to be preferred before the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Jamshedpur have to be properly included. Since the matter is on the verge of settlement and certain minor differences with respect to the alleged loss of the passport of the opposite party no. 2 has cropped up and there being a fair chance of a final settlement,...
Bigu Oraon and Ors Vs. Rajo Oraon and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-19-2016
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ---- S.A. No. 47 of 1996 ----- Against the judgment and decree dated 27.04.1996 and 25.05.1996 respectively passed in Title Appeal no.99 of 1991 by the learned Second Addl. Judicial Commissioner, Ranchi. ----- 1. Bigu Oraon.2. Ludu Oraon 3. Manga Oraon @ Manga Oraon, All sons of late Bandhu Oraon, r/o village Hinoo, P.S.Dorasnda, District- Ranchi. .......Appellants -Versus- 1. Rajo Orain, w/o Bigu Oraon.2. Uday Oraon @ Orain, s/o Bigo Oraon.3. Poko Orain, d/o Bigu Oraon.4. Suresh Kumar 5. Most. Mati Oraon, w/o late Ghasia Oraon 6. Mostt. Basanti Orain,w/o late Bhukhle Oraon 7. Bigo Orain, d/o late Bhukhle Oraon 8. Satrudhan Oraon,s/o late Bhukhle Oraon 9. Maido Oraon, W/o Late Dhanub Oraon 10. Bati Oraon, D/o Late Dhemna Oraon 11. Bamia Oraon, D/o Late Dhemna Oraon 12. Bandhan Oraon, S/o Dehmna Oraon 13. Kurti Oraon, D/o Late Dhemna Oraon 14. Most. Chandua Orain, W/o Late Mangla Oraon 15. Sania Orain, W/o Late Bjukhla Oraon 16. Most. Chandu Or...
Krishna Nand Tripathi Vs. Alok Chaurasiya
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-19-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI E.P No. 11 of 2015 Krishna Nand Tripathi ... Petitioner Versus Alok Chaurasiya ... Opposite Party -------- CORAM : THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. R.N. Sahay, Sr. Advocate. Mr. Mahesh Tewari, Advocate Mr. Abhishek Dubey, Advocate Mr. Yashvardhan Sahay, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. V.P. Singh, Sr. Advocate Ms. Rashmi Kumar, Advocate Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate ------ I.A No.3778 of 2016 25/19.8.2016 The present interlocutory application has been filed for permitting the election petitioner to lead his evidence at a later stage. The necessity of filing this application has been arisen, due to the fact that two witnesses on behalf of the election petitioner have already been examined on 29.4.2016. Thereafter, the present interlocutory application has been filed on 23.6.2016. Counter affidavit to this interlocutory application has been filed by the sole respondent, wherein it is stated that two witnesses had bee...
Bandhu Tigga Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through Central Bureau of Inve ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-19-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B. A. No. 1846 of 2016 Bandhu Tigga Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand through C.B.I Opposite Party --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Kumar Sundaram, Advocate For the C.B.I : Mr. K.P. Deo, Advocate --------- 04/Dated:19. 08/2016 Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. The petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with the case registered under Sections 120(B) r/w 420 IPC and Sections 13(2) r/w 13(1) (d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 has prayed for grant of anticipatory bail.3. The F.I.R of the instant case was registered by the C.B.I on the basis of source information alleging, inter alia, that the officers of HEC, Ranchi viz. Shri A.K.Singh, Sr. DGM, Civil & Structural Design, HMBP, Shri B. Tigga, Sr. DGM, Finance, Project Division, HMBP, Shri R.K.Mallick, Advisor, Marketing, HMBP and Shri S.K.Chakraborty, G.M, Finance, HEC Ltd. entered into criminal conspiracy wi...
Trilochan Naik ? Gudru and Ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-19-2016
1 Cr. Appeal No. 233 of 2003 [Against the judgment of conviction dated 27.01.2003 and order of sentence dated 28.01.2003, passed by learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.1, Chaibasa, Singhbhum (West) in Sessions Trial No. 52/93] 1. Trilochan Naik alias Gudru son of Bibhishan Naiak, resident of village Garka, PS Chakradharpur, District Singhbhum (West). 2. Govind Naik son of Late Dhandal Naik. 3. Prasann Naik son of Late Upendra Naik. 4. Holi Naik son of Late Aharkar Naik. 5. Dirjo Naik, son of Late Charan Naik. 6. Mukhi Naik, son of Late Kartik Mahto. 7. Durga Naik, son of Late Charan Naik. 8. Gaur Chandra Naik, son of Late Ghasi Naik, 9. Ramo Naik, son of Bimba Naik. 10. Bipro Naik, son of Bimba Naik. Appellants No.2 to 10 are resident of village Meramera, PS Chakradharpur, District Singhbhum. .Appellants Versus The State of Jharkhand ...
Tausif Ahmad and Ors Vs. Personnel and Adminis Reform
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-18-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 3930 of 2016 1. Tausif Ahmad 2. Vivek Kumar 3. Arti Kumari ..... Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand, through the Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi.2. The Principal Secretary, Personnel Administrative Reforms & Rajbhasha Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi.3. The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi.4. The Principal Secretary, Agriculture, Animal Husbandry & Co-operative Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi.5. The Director, Directorate of Fisheries, Ranchi.6. The Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, Ranchi. ... Respondents. -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Shishir Suman, Advocate For the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5 : Mrs. Shweta Singh, J.C. to G.P.-V. For the JSSC : Mr. M. Sohail Anwar, Sr. Advocate & Tejo Mistri, Advocate. -------- 04/ 19.08.2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the ...
Mayur Machine Private Limited Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Bo
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-17-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 3057 of 2012 Mayur Machine Private Limited, Kolkata having its works office at Maharajpur,Taljhari Motijharna,Sahebganj through its Director Mayur Khushwani, R/o Maharajpur,Taljhari Motijharna, Sahebganj ......... Petitioner Vrs.1. Jharkhand State Electricity Board through its Chairman, Ranchi 2. General Manager cum Chief Engineer, JSEB, Dumka Supply Area, Dist. Santhal Pargana 3. The Electrical Superintending Engineer, JSEB, Electrical Supply Circle, Dumka, Santhal Pargana 4. The Electrical Executive Engineer, JSEB, Rajmahal Division, Sahebganj 5. The Assistant Electrical Engineer, JSEB, Electric Supply Sub Division, Rajmahal, Sahebganj. ..... Respondents .... CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Satish Kumar Ughal For the Respondents : M/s Rajesh Lala, Arpit Kumar, Rohit 07/17.08.2016 Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Petitioner seeks fresh electrical connection in respect of the premises at...
Savitri Devi and Ors Vs. Human Resources Department
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-17-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 5637 of 2014 1. Savitri Devi 2. Chaya Kumari Keshri 3. Geeta Devi 4. Janki Devi 5. Dhanda Devi 6. Dhananjay Biswas 7. Birbar Mandal 8. Manohar Kumar Goswami 9. Laxman Kishore Panjyara 10.Lali Prasad Yadav ..... Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand.2. The Secretary, Human Resource Development Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi.3. The Director, Primary Education-cum-Project Director, Sarwa Siksha Abhiyan, Human Resource Development Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi.4. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Santhal Pargana Division, Dumka.5. The Deputy Commissioner, Godda.6. The District Superintendent of Education, Godda. . Respondents -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Md. Jalisur Rahman, Advocate For the Respondents : JC to SC (L&C) -------- 4/ 17.08.2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents.2. The petitioners are w...
Kamleshwar Ram Vs. Employers in Relation to the Management State Bank ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-17-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. W.P.(L) No. 5493 of 2012 ..... Kamleshwar Ram .......... Petitioner Versus 1. Employers in relation to the management, State Bank of India, Ranchi.2. The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Dalmia Nagar, Dehri, Rohtas (Bihar). ........ Respondents ..... CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Dharmendra Kr. Malityar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate Mr. Manindra Kr. Sinha, Advocate 08/17.08.2016: Heard learned counsel for the parties. The Ministry of Labour, Government of India vide order dated 30th April, 2001 referred the following dispute for adjudication to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal No.I, Dhanbad :- Whether the action of the management of State Bank of India, Dalmianagar of Dehri in terminating the services of Sri Kamleshwar Ram is justified ? If not, what relief the workman is entitled? This led to institution of Reference Case No.50 of 2002 which has been answered...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »