Jharkhand Court August 2016 Judgments
Lalita Devi and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-31-2016
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.2523of2016 1.LalitaDevi 2.ShiyaDevi 3.SurendraPandey 4.JitendraPandey@JitendraKumarPandey Petitioners Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HON'BLEMR.JUSTICEANANTBIJAYSINGH ForthePetitioners:Mr.MithileshKumarPandey,Advocate FortheState :A.P.P 04/Dated:31/08/2016 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. ThepetitionersareapprehendingtheirarrestinconnectionwithDeoriP.S.CaseNo. 07 of 2016, corresponding to G.R. No. 386 of 2016, for the offence registered under Sections302,201/34oftheIndianPenalCode. Learnedcounselforthepetitionershassubmittedthatpetitionersareinnocentand havecommittednooffence.Itisfurthersubmittedthatthereisnothingexceptsuspicion. NoanymaterialhasbeencollectedbytheInvestigatingOfficerduringinvestigation.Itis furthersubmittedthatalanddisputeisgoingonbetweentheparties,whichisalsoevident fromtheimpugnedorder.Petitionershavenocriminalantecedent.Itisfurthersubmitted thatpetitionernos.1&2areladiesandpetitionersno...
Tag this Judgment!Anirudh Kumar Gupta Vs. Jharkhand State Mineral Development Corporatio ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-31-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 2156 of 2015 with I.A. No. 4888 of 2016 Anirudh Kumar Gupta ..... Petitioner Versus 1. Jharkhand State Mineral Development Corporation Limited, a Government of Jharkhand undertaking, Ranchi.2. Chairman, Jharkhand State Mineral Development Corporation Limited, Ranchi.3. Managing Director, Jharkhand State Mineral Development Corporation Limited, Ranchi.4. The State of Jharkhand, through the Secretary, Department of Mines & Geology, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi.5. Secretary, Department of Mines, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi.6. Additional Secretary, Department of Mines, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi.7. Director, Directorate of Geology and Mines, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi. ... Respondents. -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : M/s. Pandey Neeraj Rai & Rohit Ranjan Sinha, Advocates. For the Respondent Jharkhand Sate Mineral Development Corporation Ltd. : Mr. Rupesh Singh For the Respon...
Tag this Judgment!Uma Kant Sahay Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through the Chief Secretary ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-31-2016
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 6229 of 2015 Uma Kant Sahay ..... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi.2. The Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj & N.R.E.P. (Special Division) Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi.3. The Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi.4. The Principal Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi.5. The Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel, Administrative Reforms & Raj Bhasha, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi. .. Respondents -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Sudhir Kumar Sharma, Advocate For the Respondents : Mrs. Rakhi Rani, JC to G.A-IV. -------- 3/ 31.08.2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent State.2. The petitioner was initially appointed as an Extension Officer (Industries & Commerce) in the unifi...
Tag this Judgment!Hemlal Tudu Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-31-2016
1 Cr. Appeal (DB) No.71 of 2009 [Against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 22nd March, 2004 passed by Sri Bhola Prasad, Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.IV, Dhanbad in Sessions Trial No.410 of 2001] ------ Hemlal Tudu, Son of Nunulal Tudu, resident of Raja Bhita, P.S. Tundi, District Dhanbad (Jharkhand). ........Appellant. -Versus- The State of Jharkhand. .... Respondent. ------ For the Appellant : Mrs. Priya Shrestha, Amicus Curiae For the State : Mrs. Vandana Bharti, A.P.P. ------ PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADIP KUMAR MOHANTY HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN ----- By Court:1. This criminal appeal has been preferred against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 22 nd March, 2004 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.IV, Dhanbad in connection with Sessions Trial No.410 of 2001, arising out of Tundi P.S. Case No.06 of 2001, corresponding to G.R. No.248 of 2001, whereby the appellant has been held guilty for t...
Tag this Judgment!Jagat Kishore Yadav Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-31-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 1712 of 2015 With Cr. Revision No. 1485 of 2015 --- Jagat Kishore Yadav Petitioner (In both the cases) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Rinki Devi 3. Riya Rai 4. Priya Rai ... Opposite Parties (In Cr.M.P. No. 1712 of 2015) 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Rinki Devi 3. Riya Raj 4. Priya Raj ... Opposite Parties (Cr. Revision No. 1485 of 2015) --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Jay Prakash Jha, Sr. Advocate For the O. P. Nos. 2, 3 and 4 : Mr. Manoj Kumar Sah, Advocate For the State : Mr. Mukesh Kumar, A.P.P. --- 04/31.08.2016 Since common questions of law and fact are involved in both the cases the same are being disposed of by this common order. Heard Mr. Jay Prakash Jha, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr. Manoj Kumar Sah, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party nos. 2, 3 and 4 and Mr. Mukesh Kumar, learned A.P.P. In Cr. M. P. No. 1712 of 2015 the petitio...
Tag this Judgment!Parshuram Pathak Vs. Human Resources Department
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 399 of 2015 Parshuram Pathak Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Higher Education, Department of Human Resources, Ranchi.2. The Vice Chancellor, Vinoba Bhave University, Hazaribag.3. The Registrar, Vinoba Bhave University, Hazaribag.4. The Principal, Sanskrit Upshastri College, Medninagar, Palamau. Respondents -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA For the Petitioner : : M/s. Kanti Kr. Ojha, Advocate For the State : : M/s. Chaitali C.Sinha, Advocate J.C. to A.A.G. For the University : : M/s. Indrani S. Choudhary -------- C.A.V. on 04.08.2016 Pronounced on 30.08.2016 ORDER H.C. Mishra,J.: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State as also learned counsel for the respondent Vinoba Bhave University.2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the letter No. 144/2015 dated 21.01.2015, issued by the Principal, Sanskrit Upshastri Mahavidyalaya, Medninagar, Palamau, wh...
Tag this Judgment!Manohar Prasad Vs. Road Construction
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-30-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 6180 of 2015 Manohar Prasad ..... Petitioner Versus 1. State of Jharkhand, through its Chief Secretary.2. Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi.3. Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi.4. Do (repeated) 5. The Engineer-in-Chief, Road Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi.6. Superintending Engineer, Road Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi.7. The Executive Engineer, Road Construction Department, Khunti. ... Respondents. -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : M/s. Nand Kishore Pd. Sinha & Md. Salahuddin Ansari, Advocates For the Respondent Sate : Mr. V.K. Rai, J.C. to SC-IV. -------- 05/ 30.08.2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent State.2. This is the fifth round of litigation, which the petitioner has to undergo for the claim of reg...
Tag this Judgment!Brajesh Ranjan Sinha Vs. The Union of India Through C B I
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1259 of 2016 Rabindra Kumar Karna .. Petitioner Versus The Union of India, through the CBI .. Opp. Party WITH A.B.A. No. 2136 of 2016 Brajesh Ranjan Sinha .. Petitioner Versus The Union of India, through the CBI .. Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH --------- For the Petitioner : Mrs. R.S. Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate For the CBI : Mr. K.P. Deo, S.C. --------- 10/Dated:29. h August, 2016 Both the anticipatory bail applications are heard together and are being disposed of by this common order, as they arose from the same F.I.R.2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned standing counsel for the CBI.3. The case of the prosecution in short is that one Sri R.K. Jalota, Deputy General Manager, Syndicate Bank, Regional Office, Patna made a written complaint to the Superintendent of Police, CBI, Anti-corruption Branch, Dhanbad, Jharkhand, alleging that one M/s Leonis Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. incorporate...
Tag this Judgment!Basudev Yadav Vs. The State Bank of India Through Chairman and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 5209 of 2014 Basudev Yadav ......... Petitioner Vrs.1. The State Bank of India through Chairman, Mumbai 2. The Chief General Manager, S.B.I, Local Head office, Patna 3. The Deputy General Manager(Credit), SBI (Zonal Office), Ranchi 4. The Assistant General Manager, Region-1(Zonal Office), SBI, Ranchi 5. The Assistant General Manager, SBI, RACPC, Ranchi 6. The Chief Manager(Maintenance), SBI, RACPC, Ranchi 7. The Branch Manager, SBI(Personal Banking Branch), Ranchi 8. Snr. Vice President- Head Claims, SBI General Insurance Company Ltd., Corporate Office- Mumbai 9. Premsons Motor Udyog Pvt. Ltd., Authorized Maruti Dealer, Ranchi ..... Respondents .... CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha For the Respondent- Bank : Mr. Rajesh Kumar 04/29.08.2016 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner. Learned counsel for the Respondent Bank is also present.2. Petitioner is the father of the lady Lalit...
Tag this Judgment!Baby Agarwal Vs. Bhuneshwari Devi and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 4339 of 2012 Baby Agarwal Daughter of Late Gupteshwar Prasad Agarwal, resident of village Rampur, PO & PS- Pratappur, District- Chatra . Intervenor-Petitioner --Versus-- 1. Bhuneshwari Devi wife of Radheshyam Agarwal, Resident of village, PO & PS Pratappur, District- Chatra ..Plaintiff/Respondent 2. Sohita Nand Prasad Agarwal 3. Arun Agarwal 4. Abhay Agarwal, all sons of late Gupteshwar Agarwal 5. Ashok Agarwal, son of Janardhan Prasad Agarwal 6. Ghoter Agarwal, son of Janardhan Prasad Agarwal 7. Nemichand Agarwal, son of Krishna Chandra Agarwal 8. Radheshyam Agarwal, son of Late Gulab Sao 9. Rajiv Agarwal, son of Radheshyam Agarwal 10. Sanjay Agarwal, son of Radheshyam Agarwal 11. Umeshankar Agarwal, son of Late Gulab Sao 12. Bablu Agarwal, son of Umeshankar Agarwal 13. Chandan Agarwal , son of Umeshankar Agarwal 14. Chanchal Agarwal, son of Umeshankar Agarwal All residents of village Pratappur, PO & PS Pratappur, District- Chatra, ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »