Jharkhand Court July 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dhaneshwar Rawani Vs. State of Jharkhand Through Cbi
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-30-2016
1 Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 469 of 2008 Bishwanath Rawani ............... Appellant with Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 402 of 2008 Sukhdeo Rawani ............... Appellant with Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 442 of 2008 Nuni Bala Devi ............... Appellant with Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 466 of 2008 Rajendra Rawani @ Rajendra Kr. Rawani ............... Appellant with Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 517 of 2008 Khageshwar Rawani @ Khageshar Rawani ............... Appellant with Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 209 of 2011 Dhaneshwar Rawani ............... Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand ............... Respondent (in all the appeals) (Criminal Appeal (DB) Nos. 469, 402, 442, 466 & 517 of 2008 have been preferred against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 16.02.2008 and 19.02.2008 respectively, passed by Sri Vijay Shankar Singh, Additional Sessions Judge13, Dhanbad in connection with Sessions Tria...
Illu Mahto and Ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-30-2016
1 Cr. Appeal (DB) No.1448 of 2003 [Against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 22nd September, 2003 passed by learned 9th Additional Sessions Judge, Hazaribagh in connection with Sessions Trial No.204 of 1999] ----- 1. Illu Mahto, son of Late Salik Mahto.2. Shambhu Mahto 3. Jainandan Mahto 4. Hemlal Mahto 5. Pancham Mahto All sons of Illu Mahto, resident of village Dabhatu (Gola) P.S. Gola, District Hazaribagh. . Appellants. -Versus- The State of Jharkhand. .... Respondent. ------ For the Appellants: Mr. Arjun Narayan Deo, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, A.P.P. ------ PRESENT CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. UPADHYAY HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RATNAKER BHENGRA ----- CAV On 17th February, 2016 Delivered on 30th July, 2016 D. N. UPADHYAY, J.:1. This criminal appeal has been directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 22nd September, 2003 passed by learned 9th Additional Sessions Judge, Hazaribagh in connection with Sessions Trial No.204 ...
Rajendra Rawani ? Rajendra Kumar Rawani Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-30-2016
1 Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 469 of 2008 Bishwanath Rawani ............... Appellant with Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 402 of 2008 Sukhdeo Rawani ............... Appellant with Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 442 of 2008 Nuni Bala Devi ............... Appellant with Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 466 of 2008 Rajendra Rawani @ Rajendra Kr. Rawani ............... Appellant with Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 517 of 2008 Khageshwar Rawani @ Khageshar Rawani ............... Appellant with Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 209 of 2011 Dhaneshwar Rawani ............... Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand ............... Respondent (in all the appeals) (Criminal Appeal (DB) Nos. 469, 402, 442, 466 & 517 of 2008 have been preferred against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 16.02.2008 and 19.02.2008 respectively, passed by Sri Vijay Shankar Singh, Additional Sessions Judge13, Dhanbad in connection with Sessions Tria...
Khageshwar Rawani ? Khageshar Rawani Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-30-2016
1 Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 469 of 2008 Bishwanath Rawani ............... Appellant with Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 402 of 2008 Sukhdeo Rawani ............... Appellant with Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 442 of 2008 Nuni Bala Devi ............... Appellant with Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 466 of 2008 Rajendra Rawani @ Rajendra Kr. Rawani ............... Appellant with Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 517 of 2008 Khageshwar Rawani @ Khageshar Rawani ............... Appellant with Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 209 of 2011 Dhaneshwar Rawani ............... Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand ............... Respondent (in all the appeals) (Criminal Appeal (DB) Nos. 469, 402, 442, 466 & 517 of 2008 have been preferred against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 16.02.2008 and 19.02.2008 respectively, passed by Sri Vijay Shankar Singh, Additional Sessions Judge13, Dhanbad in connection with Sessions Tria...
Nuni Bala Devi Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-30-2016
1 Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 469 of 2008 Bishwanath Rawani ............... Appellant with Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 402 of 2008 Sukhdeo Rawani ............... Appellant with Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 442 of 2008 Nuni Bala Devi ............... Appellant with Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 466 of 2008 Rajendra Rawani @ Rajendra Kr. Rawani ............... Appellant with Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 517 of 2008 Khageshwar Rawani @ Khageshar Rawani ............... Appellant with Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 209 of 2011 Dhaneshwar Rawani ............... Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand ............... Respondent (in all the appeals) (Criminal Appeal (DB) Nos. 469, 402, 442, 466 & 517 of 2008 have been preferred against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 16.02.2008 and 19.02.2008 respectively, passed by Sri Vijay Shankar Singh, Additional Sessions Judge13, Dhanbad in connection with Sessions Tria...
Sukhdeo Rawani Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-30-2016
1 Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 469 of 2008 Bishwanath Rawani ............... Appellant with Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 402 of 2008 Sukhdeo Rawani ............... Appellant with Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 442 of 2008 Nuni Bala Devi ............... Appellant with Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 466 of 2008 Rajendra Rawani @ Rajendra Kr. Rawani ............... Appellant with Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 517 of 2008 Khageshwar Rawani @ Khageshar Rawani ............... Appellant with Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 209 of 2011 Dhaneshwar Rawani ............... Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand ............... Respondent (in all the appeals) (Criminal Appeal (DB) Nos. 469, 402, 442, 466 & 517 of 2008 have been preferred against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 16.02.2008 and 19.02.2008 respectively, passed by Sri Vijay Shankar Singh, Additional Sessions Judge13, Dhanbad in connection with Sessions Tria...
Thomas Purti Vs. Ms Central Coalfields Limited Through Its Chairman Cu ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-30-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 4183 of 2014 Thomas Purti, son of Late Habil Munda, resident of Central Sounda Colony, P.O.-Central Sounda, P.S.-Bhurkunda, District-Ramgarh. .. Petitioner Versus 1.M/s Central Coalfields Limited 2.Chairman-cum-Managing Director, M/s Central Coalfields Limited, Darbhanga House, Ranchi 3.General Manager (P&IR), M/s Central Coalfields Limited, Darbhanga House, Ranchi 4.Project Officer, Central Coalfields Limited, Central Sounda, Ramgarh. .. Respondents Present CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajit Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. A.K.Das, Advocate C.A.V. ON.12.05.2016 Pronounced on 30 /07/ 2016 Aggrieved by the order passed by the respondents dated 23.04.2013, the petitioner has approached this court, challenging the same. An application for grant of compassionate appointment filed by the petitioner was dismissed by the impugned order. The father of the petitioner was working in the Central Coalfi...
Kalipada Mahato Vs. Babi Mahatain and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. W.P.(C) No. 4650 of 2015 . . Kalipada Mahato Petitioner versus 1. Babi Mahatain 2. Badri Pramanik @ Baandiram Paramanik . Respondents. ----- CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI NATH VERMA ----- For the Appellants : Mr. A.K.Sahani For the Respondent: Mr. Jitendra Tripathi ----- Reserved on 21.07.2016 Delivered on:29. /07/2016 R.N.Verma,J.The plaintiff has preferred this writ application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing of the order dated 13.04.2015 passed by the learned Civil Judge ( Junior Division), Bokaro in Title Suit No. 47 of 2007, whereby the petition filed by the plaintiff for appointment of Pleader Commissioner under Order 26 Rule 9, read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure ( in short the 'Code') has been rejected.2. At the instance of the plaintiff/petitioner, a suit was filed for a decree of specific performance of contract and for confirmation of possession over the suit land and further for a ...
Madhusudan Banerjee Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision - No. 1115 of 2014 With Cr. Revision - No. 1136 of 2014 With Cr. Revision - No. 1165 of 2014 1. Nageshwar Sharma, son of late Niranjan Sharma, resident of Ashapurna Society, PO & PS-Mithapur, District- Deobhumi Dwarka(Gujarat) (in Cr. Revision - No. 1115 of 2014) 2. Madhusudan Banerjee, son of late Satindra Chandra Banerjee, resident of S.N.Roy road, Kolkata PO- Shahapur, PS- New Alipore, District- South 24 Pargana, Kolkata (W.B.) (in Cr. Revision - No. 1136 of 2014) 3. Binoy Kumar Mishra, son of Late Chandrakant Mishra Resident of D-9, Pragati Nagar, PO & PS- Dipka, District- Korwa (Chhatisgarh) (in Cr. Revision - No. 1165 of 2014) . . Petitioners --Versus-- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Director of Mines Safety, Dhanbad Region no.-1, Dhanbad at PO, PS & District- Dhanbad . .Opposite parties (In Cr. Revision nos. 1115 of 2014, 1136 of 2014 and 1165 of 2014) With Cr. Revision - No. 1195 of 2014 Mahendra Prasad Gupta @ Mahendra Ku...
Nilai Educational Trust Through Its Chairman Bhim Munda Vs. All India ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-29-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 3511 of 2016 --- Nilai Educational Trust, Ranchi. ....... Petitioner Versus 1. All India Council for Technical Education, New Delhi.2. The Chairman, All India Council for Technical Education, New Delhi.3. The Secretary, All India Council for Technical Education, New Delhi.4. The Director, Approval Bureau, All India Council for Technical Education, New Delhi.5. State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Higher and Technical Education, Jharkhand ...... Respondents ..... CORAM: The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitioner: M/s Anil Kr. Sinha, Sr. Advocate, Ritu Kumar, Vikash Kumar, Advocates For the Resp -AICTE: Mr. P.A.S. Pati, Advocate For the Resp State: JC to AG --- 05/ 29.07.2016 Learned counsel for the Respondent No. 5 submits that the Department of Higher and Technical Education, Government of Jharkhand is also a necessary party in the instant matter and it should also be impleaded.2. Let the State of Jharkhand...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »