Jharkhand Court May 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Raj Kumar Prasad Vs. State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: May-10-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P.- No. 893 of 2008 Raj Kumar Prasad, son of Late Chhotan Prasad Resident of Qtr. No. D.T-2233 Tanki side, Dhurwa, PO & PS- Dhurwa, District- Ranchi . . . Petitioner --Versus-- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Shri Krishna Prasad, son of Late Kali Ram Resident of New Area IInd lane, PS- Sadar, Dist.-Hazaribagh . Opposite parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI NATH VERMA For the petitioner : Mr. R.A.Choubey, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shekhar Sinha, A.P.P. For O.P. No.2 :- Mr. Hemant Kumar Shikarwar, Advocate ----------- CAV ON- 01/10/2015 PRONOUNCED ON-10/05/2016 Invoking the inherent power of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short the Code), the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the entire proceeding including the order taking cognizance dated 19.01.2007 passed by Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Hazaribag in Complaint Case no. 1342 of 2006, whereby and whereunder the court below took cognizance of offenc...
State of Jharkhand Through Its Secretary Department of Industries and ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: May-10-2016
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No. 578 of 2015 1. State of Jharkhand through its Secretary, Department of Industries, Government of Jharkhand, Nepal House, Doranda, Ranchi 2. The Director, Department of Industries, Government of Jharkhand, Nepal House, Ranchi 3. General Manager, District Industries Centre, Ratu Road, POGPO, PSSukhdeonagar, Ranchi ... Appellants Versus 1. Ram Anugrah Pandey, S/o Late Trijugi Pandey, R/o Debi Mandap Road, Ratu Road, Hehal, Sukhdeonagar, Ranchi 2. The Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Bhawan, HEC, Dhurwa, Jagarnathpur, Ranchi ... ... Respondents For the Appellants : Mr. Abhay Prakash, J.C. to G.A. For the Respondents : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate Mr. Suraj singh, Advocate Mr. Amitabh Prasad, Advocate Mr. Arpan Mishra, Advocate CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIRENDER SINGH, CHIEF JUSTICE HO...
Durga Pandey Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: May-10-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No.- No. 1100 of 2015 Durga Pandey, Wife of P.K.Pandey Resident of Vivek Nagar, Road No. 5, Chhota Govindpur, PO & PS- Govindpur, Town- Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum . . . Petitioner --Versus-- The State of Jharkhand . . ..Opposite parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI NATH VERMA For the petitioner: M/s. Navneet Sahay & Nagmani Tiwari, Advocates For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, A.P.P. , ----------- The 10th May, 2016 Challenge is this revision application is to the judgment dated 24.06.2015 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-Vth, Jamshedpur in Criminal Appeal no. 186 of 2013 whereby and whereunder the judgment of acquittal dated 24.06.2013 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur in C/1 Case no. 164 of 2007 has been affirmed.2. The relevant facts, which are absolutely necessary and germane for the disposal of this revision would run thus: The petitioner filed the aforesaid compl...
Smt Archana Ghosh Vs. Smt Arpana Ghosh
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: May-09-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI S.A.No.137 of 2012 Smt. Archana Ghosh & Ors. . Appellant Versus Smt. Aparna Ghosh & Ors. .... Respondents --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA --------- For the Appellants : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Adv. For the Respondents : Mr. C.Pal & Mr. S.K.Deo, Adv. --------- 16/Dated:09. 05.2016 I.A.No.2862 of 2016 This Interlocutory Application has been filed for grant of interim stay of the further proceeding in Execution Case No.13 of 2011, pending in the court of learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Vth, Jamshedpur.2. Mr. Indrajit Sinha, learned counsel appearing for the appellants, has submitted that in S.A.No.137 of 2012, substantial questions of law were framed by order dated 08.11.2012 while admitting the appeal for hearing, interim stay was granted till the next date, as per Annexure-IA/1. That during the pendency of the present appeal the decree holders had filed an Execution Case being No. 13 of 2011, in the court of learned Civil J...
Chhotu Turi Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: May-06-2016
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.Rev.No.743 of 2012 Chhotu Turi, son of Sri Nand Turi @ Nand Lal Turi, resident of village Lal Bangla, P.O. & P.S.Govindpur, Dist Dhanbad.................Petitioner VERSUS1State of Jharkhand 2.Parwati Kumari, daughter of Sri Ganesh Turi, resident of village Lal Bangla, P.O. & P.S. Govindpur Dist-DhanbadOpposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN For the Petitioner : Mr.M.B.Lal For the State :A.P.P For the O.P.No.2 : Mr.S.P.Sinha Reserved on 22.4.2016 Delivered on. 06.5.2016 13. 06.5.16. In this revision application the petitioner has challenged the order dated 26.6.2012 by which a petition under Section 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed by the petitioner for discharge in connection with Sessions Trial No.422 of 2010 (G.R.No.1373 of 2008) corresponding to Govindpur P.S. case no.141 of 2008 has been dismissed by the Additional Sessions Judge VII, Dhanbad. Brief fact giving rise to the present case is that an FIR was lodged b...
Ram Sewak Sahu Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: May-06-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 1403 of 2010 Ram Sewak Sahu .... Petitioner Vrs.1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Secretary, Finance Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi 3. The Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi 4. The Treasury Officer, Secretariat Treasury, Doranda, Ranchi 5. The Treasury Officer, Ranchi 5. The Central Bank of India through its Branch Manager, Piska More Branch, Ranchi ..... Respondents .... CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Anurag Kashyap For the Respondents : Mr. Amit Kumar, J.C to G.P.II1206.05.2016 Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Petitioner superannuated on 31.3.1996 as Clerk from the Treasury Office, Doranda. He was prosecuted in connection with R.C. Case No. 53(A)/96 and sentenced to 4 years of imprisonment along with fine of Rs.20,000/- vide judgment dated 30.6.2009 passed by the learned Special Judge, C.B.I, Ranchi. Petitioner has preferred criminal appeal being Cr. Appeal(SJ) No. 648 of 2009, which...
Md Mahfuj Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: May-06-2016
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 163 of 2015 Md. Mahfuj, son of Kitabjan Mian, resident of village Bhandarkunda (Karudih), P.O. & P.S. Gandey, District-Giridih. .. Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Rafat Praveen Soni @ Rafat Pareveen Soni, daugther of Md. Asfar and wife of Md. Mahfuj, resident of Qr. II-B-311, Koylanagar, P.O. & P.S. Saraidhela, District-Dhanbad (Jharkhand). ..... Opposite Parties Present CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN For the Petitioner : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate For the State : A.P.P For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Lukesh Kumar, Advocate Mr. A.K.Singh, Advocate C.A.V. ON.18.04.2016 Pronounced on 06/05 / 2016 In this revision application the husband has prayed to set aside the judgment dated 30.01.2015, whereby the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Dhanbad in Maintenance Petition No. 30 of 2009 has been pleased to grant maintenance at the rate of Rs.4,000/- per month to the wife and Rs.2,000/- per month to the son(till att...
Srinibash Ranjan Mishra and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: May-06-2016
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.Rev. No.893 of 2015 1.Srinibash Ranjan Mishra.@ Nibash Ranjan Mishra 2.Subhash Ranjan Mishra 3. Chittaranjan Mishra 4. Bikash Ranjan Mishra 5. Priya Ranjan Mishra All sons of late Biman Bihari Mishra, residents of Mahalla Rajaqpara, at Kalitalla, P.O. & P.S. Pakur (T),Dist-Pakur..................Petitioners VERSU S1State of Jharkhand 2.Prasant Kumar Mishra, son of Basant Kumar Mishra, resident f Kalitalla Road, at Kalitalla, P.O.& P.S. Pakur (T) Dist-Pakur........Opposite Parties Coram: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN For the Petitioners:Mr.Mahesh Tiwari For the State : A.P.P For the O.P.No.2 : Mr. Vishwanath Roy Reserved on 29.4.2016 Delivered on 06.5.2016 08/ 06.5.16 The cognizance order dated 12.6.2015 in P.C.R. Case no.87 of 2014 is under challenge in this revision application. By order dated 12.6.2015, learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pakur in P.C.R. Case no.87 of 2014 has taken cognizance of the offence under Section 500/34 of the Indi...
Ms Shivam Iron and Steel Co Ltd Thr Its Manager Finance Cum Authorized ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: May-06-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. W.P.(C) No. 4516 of 2015 M/s Shivam Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. Giridih, Jharkhand. Petitioner. Versus 1. Mahanadi Coalfields Limited,Sambalpur, Orissa 2. The General Manager ( S& M) MCL, Sambalpur, Orissa Respondents ------ CORAM THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ----- For the Petitioner : Mr.Sumet Gadodia For the Respondents : M/s Anoop Kumar Mehta & N.Ranjan ----- 11/06.05.2016. In this writ application, the petitioner challenged two demand notices dated 22.05.2015 and 10.8.2015 respectively, whereby the Respondent no.2, the General Manager ( S&M), Mahanadi Coalfields Limited, raised a demand of Rs. 17,90,541.85 paise for non-lifting of coal,as per Clause 4.5.1 of the Fuel Supply Agreement ( Annexure-2).2. At the outset, Sri Anoop Kumar Mehta, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the present dispute arose due to invocation of Clause 4.5 of the Fuel Supply Agreement by the Respondent no.2, because the petitioner had not lifted the ...
Badruddin Ansari Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: May-05-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Revision No. 1114 of 2015 Badruddin Ansari, Son of Late Siraj Ansari resident of Qr. No. CS65 Moonidih Project, PO Moonidih, PS- Putkee, District- Dhanbad . . Petitioner --Versus-- State of Jharkhand . . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI NATH VERMA For the petitioner : Mr. A.K.Sahani, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, A.P.P. For the Complainant : Mrs. Amrita Banerjee, Advocate The 5th May, 2016 The solitary question, which falls for consideration in the instant revision application, is as to whether even after affirmation of judgment of conviction of the petitioner under Section 417 of the Indian Penal Code and order of sentence of rigorous imprisonment for one year by the appellate court, the petitioner can be allowed to compound the offence under Section 320 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short the Code)? 2. The details of the facts is not required to be reproduced herein rather a brief statement...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »