Jharkhand Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Jamshedpur Well Pack Poly Vs. Bihar State Electricity Board
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-22-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI C.W.J.C. No. 3658 of 2000 (R) 1. M/s Arun Refractories a partnership firm having its factory at Chirkunda, P.O. and P.S. Chirkunda, District Dhanbad, through one of its partners Sri Sushil Kumar Gadhyan, son of late Rajkumar Gadhyan, resident of Chirkunda, P.O. and P.S. Chirkunda, District Dhanbad (connection No. NR-452 having contract demand of 80 KVA) 2.M/s. Maithan Mineral Pvt. Ltd. a company incorporated under the companies Act, 1956 having its factory at Chirkunda, P.O. and P.S. Chirkunda, District Dhanbad through one of its directors Sri Binod Kumar Agarwalla, son of late Raghunath Agarwalla, resident of Chirkunda, P.O. and P.S. Chirkunda, District Dhanbad (connection No. NR-410 having contract demand of 460 KVA) 3.M/s Ashok Refractories Pvt. Ltd. a company incorporated under the companies Act 1956 having its factory at Nirsha, P.O. & P.S. Nirsha District Dhanbad through one of its Directors Sri Tapas Kumar Rakshit son of Maniklal Rakshit re...
Nand Kishore Banra Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-22-2016
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.Rev. No. 931 of 2015 Nand Kishore Banra, son of Rma Lal Banra, resident of village Kondorkora,P.O.Jaintgarh, P.S.Jagannthpur, Dist-West Singhbhum.Petitioner VERSUS1 State of Jharkhand 2. Anmol Banra, son of Nand Kishore Banra Minor represented through his mother Bela Kusum Banra 3. Bel Kusum Banra, wife of Nand Kishore Banra Both 2 and 3 are resident of Mohalla New Colony Tungri, in front of Newatia Guest House, P.O.Chaibasa, P.S.Mufasil Chaibasa, Dist- West Singhbhum......Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN For the Petitioner : Mr. P.A.S.Pati,Advocate For the State :A.P.P For O.Ps.2 and 3 : Mr.Birendra Birman, Advocate 03/ 22.4.16. This revision application has been filed by the husband under Section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act challenging the order dated 27.5.2015 in Misc. Case No.12 of 2014 under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Brief facts giving rise to this revision application are follows: The applica...
M/S Tis Fab Limited Vs. Bihar State Electricity Board
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-22-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI C.W.J.C. No. 3658 of 2000 (R) 1. M/s Arun Refractories a partnership firm having its factory at Chirkunda, P.O. and P.S. Chirkunda, District Dhanbad, through one of its partners Sri Sushil Kumar Gadhyan, son of late Rajkumar Gadhyan, resident of Chirkunda, P.O. and P.S. Chirkunda, District Dhanbad (connection No. NR-452 having contract demand of 80 KVA) 2.M/s. Maithan Mineral Pvt. Ltd. a company incorporated under the companies Act, 1956 having its factory at Chirkunda, P.O. and P.S. Chirkunda, District Dhanbad through one of its directors Sri Binod Kumar Agarwalla, son of late Raghunath Agarwalla, resident of Chirkunda, P.O. and P.S. Chirkunda, District Dhanbad (connection No. NR-410 having contract demand of 460 KVA) 3.M/s Ashok Refractories Pvt. Ltd. a company incorporated under the companies Act 1956 having its factory at Nirsha, P.O. & P.S. Nirsha District Dhanbad through one of its Directors Sri Tapas Kumar Rakshit son of Maniklal Rakshit re...
Ms Shah Brothers Through One of Its Partner Sri Raj Kumar Shah Vs. The ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-21-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 2027 of 2016 --- M/s Shah Brothers --- - --- Petitioner Versus 1. The Union of India through the Ministry of Mines and Steel 2. The State of Jharkhand through the Principal Secretary, Department of Mines and Geology 3. The Joint Secretary, Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Jharkhand 4. The Deputy Commissioner, West Singhbhum, Chaibasa 5. The District Mining Officer, West Singhbhum, Chaibasa 6. The Assistant Mining Officer, West Singhbhum, Chaibasa --- Respondents --- CORAM:The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitioner: M/s Amarendra Sharan, Sr. Advocate, Krishanu Ray, Advocate For the Resp - State: Mr. Ajit Kumar, A.A.G. For the Resp UOI: Mr. Rajiv Sinha, ASGI --- 02/ 21.04.2016 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that surviving defects have already been removed.2. Petitioner was granted mining lease of Iron Ore over an area of 233.99 Hectare in Karampada Reserve Forest in West Singhbhum district...
Ramjeet Lohra and Ors Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-21-2016
1 Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 1373 of 2004 (Against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 22.06.2004 and 23.06.2004 respectively passed by Sri Alok Kumar Dubey, Addl. Sessions Judge, Fast Track CourtI, Gumla in connection with Sessions Trial No.35 of 2002 corresponding to G.R. Case No.470 of 1998 arising out of Dumri P.S. Case No. 12 of 1998) 1. Ramjeet Lohra 2. Rupan Lohra 3. Ramadyal Lohra 4. Sukhna Lohra ......... .... Appellants Versus The State of Jharkhand Respondent PRESENT: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. UPADHYAY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RATNAKER BHENGRA For the Appellants : Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Sanjay Kumar PandeyII, A.P.P. J U D G M E N T By Court: (D.N. Upadhyay, J.) This criminal appeal has been directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 22.06.200...
Chouthi Orain and Ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-21-2016
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No. 378 of 2004 1 (a) Most. Chouthi Orain 1 (b) Shrinath Oraon 1 (c) Nanda Oraon 1 (d) Shiva Oraon 1 (e) Lalita Orain 1 (f) Smt. Champu Devi 1 (g) Smt. Anita Kujur 2. Ramjeet Oraon, Son of Late Moti Oraon, both resident of VillageJuria, P.O. Juria, P.S. & District Lohardaga ...Appellants Versus 1. State of Jharkhand 2. The Commissioner, South Chhotanagpur Division at Ranchi 3. The Additional Collector, Lohardaga 4. The Special Officer, Lohardaga 5. Chaitu Oraon, son of Late Jit Bahan Oraon 6. Lal Mohan Bhagat, Son of Late Bhola Bhagat, Both 5 & 6 residents of village Juria, P.O. Juria, P.S. & District Lohardaga 7. Jhanga Lal, son of Late Bhadru Sahu, Resident of Lohardaga, P.O., P.S. & District Lohardaga 8. Indu Agarwal W/o Late Jugal Kishore Agrawal 9. Alok Kumar Agarwal 10. Jyoti Kumar Agarwal, both 9 and 10 sons of Late Jugal Kishore ...
Rajendra Prasad Singh and Anr. Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-21-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) Case No. 4855 of 2007 1. Rajendra Prasad Singh, representing as President of Hatia Railway Market Committee, Hatia 2. Ram Pravesh Singh, Hatia, Ranchi .... Petitioners Vrs.1. The Union of India through the General Manger, South Eastern Railway, Garden Reach, Kolkata 2. The General Manager(Engg.) SER, Kolkata 3. The Divisional Railway Manager(Engg.), SER, Adra, West Bengal 4. The Divisional Railway Manager(Engg.),SER, Ranchi Division ..... Respondents .... CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Arshad Hussain For the Respondents : M/s Mahesh Tewari, S.C., Railway & Varun Prabhakar 12/21.04.2016 Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Two petitioners, one claiming to be representing the Hatia Railway Market Committee and another in his individual capacity had approached this Court seeking to raise grievance in respect of members of Hatia Railway Bazar Samiti who are said to be the allottees of the shops mad...
Bobila ? Bobilal ? Babilas Soren Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-21-2016
1 Criminal Appeal (DB)No. 253 of 2008 (Against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 05th December,2007 and 11th December, 2007 respectively passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge, (F.T.C.III), Godda in connection with Sessions Trial No. 153 of 2005 corresponding to G.R. Case 151 of 2007 no. 62 of 2005, Boarijor P.S. Case no. 10 of 2005) Bobila @ Bobilal @ Babilas Soren ...... Appellant Vs. The State of Jharkhand ......... Respondent PRESENT: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RATNAKER BHENGRA ---------- For the appellant :Mr. Ashish Verma, Amicus Curiae For the...
Kunj Bihari Sharma and Anr Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-21-2016
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No. 100 of 2008 1. KUNJ BIHARI SHARMA S/O LATE MAHENDRA SHARMA, NEW MADHUKAM ROAD NO 2 CHUNNA BHATTA JAI PRAKASH NAGAR PO AND PS SUKHDEO NAGAR DISTRICT RANCHI2 BIKRAMA SINGH S/O SRI JAMUNA SINGH, RAJENDRA NAGAR COLONY PO HEHAL PS SUKHDEO NAGAR DISTRICT RANCHI ... APPELLANTS VERSUS1 UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE MINISTRY OF ENERGY DEPARTMENT OF COAL NEW DELHI 2. THE JOINT SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF COAL GOVERNMENT OF INDIA PO AND PS NEW DELHI 3. THE UNDER SECRETARY (PRIW1), MINISTRY OF COAL GOVERNMENT OF INDIA PO AND PS NEW DELHI4 COAL INDIA LTD, COAL BHAWAN 10 NETAJI SUBHASH ROAD PO AND PS NETAJI SUBHASH ROAD KOLKATA WEST BENGAL 700 001 THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN5 THE CHAIRMAN, COAL INDIA LIMITED COAL BHAWAN 10 NETAJI SUBHASH ROAD PO AND PS NETAJI SUBHASH ROAD KOLKATA WEST BENGAL 700 001 6. CENTRAL COALFIELDS LTD, DARBHANG...
Majidan Bibi and Anr Vs. Union of India Through General Manager South ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-21-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI M.A.No.391 of 2014 --- 1. Majidan Bibi, W/o Sk. Dilkhus @ Sk. Dilkhus Alam.2. Sk. Dilkhus @ Sk. Dilkhus Alam. Both r/o Zakir Nagar, P.O. Azadnagar, Mango, P.S. Jamshedpur, District- East Singhbhum. . Appellants. Vrs. Union of India, through the General Manager, South Eastern Railway, 3, Koilaghat Street, P.O./P.S. Garden Reach, Kolkata (West Bengal). .. Respondents. --- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA --- For the Appellant : M/s.Rajesh Kumar Jha,Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. R.N.Roy, Advocate. -- 03/21.04.2016 I.A.NO.5238/2014 This interlocutory application has been filed for condoning the delay of 311 days in preferring the instant appeal. Learned counsel for the respondent has opposed that no sufficient cause and reasonable explanation has ben given for condoning the delay. Heard. Considering the reasons assigned in paras 3,4 and 5 of the supporting affidavit, sufficient cause and reasonable explanation has been given, according...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »