Jharkhand Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Khushal Arjun Rathor Vs. Mines and Geological Survey
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-28-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 6358 of 2015 Khushal Arjun Rathor S/o Shri Arjun ladha R/o Court Road, Chaibasa, West Singhbhum .... Petitioner Vrs.1. The State of Jharkhand through Secretary Department of Mines & Geology 2. The Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Mines, 3rd Floor,Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi ..... Respondents .... CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : M/s Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Advocate : Mr. K. Venu Gopal, Sr. Advocate : Mr. Naveen Kumar, Advocate : Mr. N.K.Pasari, Advocate : Mr. Nikhil Sharma, Advocate For the Union of India : Mr. Natrajan, A.S.G.I : Mrs Anubha Rawat Choudhary : Mr. Pratyush Kumar Jha For the State : Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha, Sr. Advocate : Mr. Jai Prakash, A.A.G. : Mrs. Chaitali C. Sinha, J.C to A.A.G0428.04.2016 The writ petition was preferred on 21.12.2015 with a prayer to direct the respondent- State of Jharkhand to ensure compliance of the provisions of Section 8(A)(3) of the Mines and Mineral(D...
Gupteshwar Ram Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-28-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No.1696 of 2006 Gupteshwar Ram, son of Shri Akshaya Lal Ram, resident of Kunwar Singh Colony, Hinoo, P.O.-Doranda, P.S. Doranda, District-Ranchi. .... Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development, Primary & Secondary Education, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi.3. The Secretary, Primary and Secondary Education, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi.4. The State of Bihar.5. The Director (Administration)-cum-Joint Secretary, Secondary/Primary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.6. The Joint Secretary, Secondary/Primary Education Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi. ...... Respondents --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Arpan Mishra, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Rakesh Kr. Shahi, J.C to A.A.G ----- 08/28.04.2016 Being partly aggrieved by the impugned order dated 19.06.2000 (Annexure-2) by which the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the same and for direction to re...
Ms Rural Development and Marketing Pvt Ltd Through Its Director Dev Ku ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-27-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 1848 of 2016 1. M/s. Rural Development and Marketing Pvt. Ltd, District Bhagalpur, State of Bihar 2. Dev Kumar Dubey ..... Petitioners vs.- 1. The State of Jharkhand through Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 2. The Secretary, Department of Mines, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 3. The Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar 4. Assistant Mining Officer, Deoghar 5. Circle Officer, Sarwan, Deoghar 6. Sub-Divisional Officer, Deoghar ......Respondents. ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH ---- For the Petitioners : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Adv. For the Respondent-State : J.C. to A. A. G. --- 3/27.4.2016 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The sand ghat for Mouza-Jiyakhara under Sarwan Block, District Deoghar was settled in favour of the petitioner after auction, by lease executed on 27th October, 2015 (Annexure-1) with Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar. The settlement of sand ghat for the rest of period of lease has been can...
Binay Kumar Sinha Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-27-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No.3956 of 2010 Binay Kumar Sinha, son of late S.S. Prasad, Resident of Domchanch, P.O. & P.S. Domchanch, District-Koderma. .... Petitioner Versus 1. State of Jharkhand.2. Deputy Inspector General of Police, Coal Area, Bokaro, P.O., P.S. and District Bokaro.3. The Superintendent of Police, Bokaro, P.O., P.S. & District Bokaro. ...... Respondents --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sidhartha Roy, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Chanchal Jain, J.C to A.G ----- 07/27.04.2016 In the instant writ application, the petitioner has interalia prayed for quashing of the order dated 31.05.2009 passed by the respondent no.3 pertaining to infliction of punishment of award of black mark for the alleged misconduct and the order by the appellate authority dated 15.02.2010.2. Sans details, the facts as disclosed in the writ application, that while the petitioner was continuing as officer In-charge of Amlabad Ou...
Md Asadullah Vs. The Union of India Through Chief Secretary Government ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-27-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI M.A.No.179 of 2012 1. Md. Asadullah, S/o Fariduddin Ahmad 2. Solat Fatima @ Pinki, D/o Md. Asadullah 3. Romi, D/o Md. Asadullah 4. Samrin, D/o Md. Asadullah 5. Imran, S/o Md. Asadullah 6. Salman, S/o Md. Asadullah Appellants no.2 to 6 are R/o village and P.O. Chitarpur, P.S. Ramgarh, District- Hazaribagh . Appellants/Claimants Versus 1. The Union of India, through the Chief Secretary, Government of India, New Delhi 2. The C.O., 56 APO, 523 ASC Battalion, Deepa toli Military Camp P.S. Sardar, Ranchi ..... Respondents/O.P. --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA --------- For the Appellant : Mr. Shahid Khan, Adv., Md. Razaullah Ansari For the Respondent : Mr. Pratyush Kumar, C.G.C --------- 13/Dated:27. 4.2016 This appeal has been preferred for enhancement of the compensation award of Rs.Rs.5,39,600/- by order dated 16.06.2012, in Claim case no. No.159/2005, passed by the Vth, District Judge-cum-Presiding Officer, Motor Vehicle Accide...
Binod Kumar Mandal Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through C B I
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-27-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Appeal(S.J.) No. 294 of 2016 ----------- Binod Kumar Mandal Son of Late Ramsurat Mandal, resident of house of Raj Kumar Shrma Behind B/70 Harmu Housing Colony, PO- Harmu, PS-Argora, District-Ranchi . Appellant --Versus-- The State of Jharkhand through Central Bureau of Investigation . Respondent For the appellant : M/s. Anil Kumar Sinha and Alok Kumar, Advocates For the C.B.I. : Mr. K.P.Deo, Advocate CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI NATH VERMA ----------- 04/27.04.2016 Admit.2. It appears that the Lower Court Record has already been called for in Criminal appeal (S.J.) no. 289 of 2016.3. Heard learned counsel appearing for the appellant as well as the learned counsel representing the C.B.I. on the matter of bail.4. Before considering the prayer for grant of bail, it is necessary to give brief facts of the prosecution case: On the basis of information received through reliable source, R.C. Case no. 24(A)/1995(Pat.) was instituted at the in...
Tambo Kunkal and Anr Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-27-2016
Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No.1924 of 2004 ---------- Against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 06.10.2004 & 08.10.2004 passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-II at Chaibasa in connection with S.T.No.223 of 2003. ---------- 1. Tambo Kunkal.2. Lebor Singh Kunkal. ...Appellants -Versus- The State of Jharkhand. ... ...Respondent --------- For the Appellants: Mr. J.N.Upadhyay, Advocate. For the State: Mr. Sudhansu Kumar Deo, A.P.P. --------- PRESENT THE HONE'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RATNAKER BHENGRA --------- By Court [D.N.Upadhyay,J]. This Cr. Appeal has been directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 06.10.2004 and 08.10.2004 respectively passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-II at Chaibasa in connection with S.T.No.223 of 2003, corresponding to G.R.No.237 of 2003, arising out of Manjhari P.S. Case No. 11 of 2003 whereby the appellants have been held guilty for the offence punishable under Sections 302/3...
Bharat Prasad Kesri Vs. Rajesh Kumar
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-27-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P.No.422 of 2012 1. Bhudeo Mandal 2. Khageshwar Mandal 3. Brajesh Mandal 4. Bhagirath Mandal .Petitioners Versus 1. Chhatish Mandal 2. Battis Manadl 3. Ramdeo Mandal 4. Shyamdeo Mandal 5. Buli Mandal .... Respondents --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA --------- For the petitioner : None For the Respondent : Mr. Ranjan Kumar, Adv. --------- 08/Dated:27. 04.2016 Learned counsel for the respondent is in attendance.2. It transpires from the record that on 12.04.2016 none had appeared on repeated calls and it was observed that if the case is not prosecuted on the next date, it shall stand dismissed for non- prosecution.3. Today, also on repeated calls none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case.4. Accordingly, the civil miscellaneous petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. (AMITAV K. GUPTA, J.) fahim/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI M.A.N...
Jairani Devi Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-27-2016
Criminal Appeal (S.J.) No. 67 of 2015 Against the judgment of acquittal dated 05.01.2015, passed by Civil Judge, J.D. Dhanbad (learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dhanbad)in connection with G.R. Case No. 3797 of 2008. Jairani Devi @ Jarani Devi, wife of Kara Paswan Resident of Ekra Work Shop, PO- Bans Jora, PS Loyabad, District- Dhanbad . . . Appellant --Versus-- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Rajender Paswan, son of Latte Balkishun Paswan 3. Bhola Paswan, son of Late Paran Paswan 4. Bholi Paswan, son of late Parmeshwar Paswan 5. Vicky Paswan, son of Rajender Paswan 6. Urmila Devi, wife of Rajender Paswan 7. Keshri Devi, wife of Bholi Paswan All residents of Ekra, PO Bans Jora, PS- Loyabad, District- Dhanbad . . . Respondents For the Appellant : M/s. Vijay Shankar Prasad, Khagesh Thakur & Nanda Kumari, Advocates For the State: : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, A.P.P. PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI NATH VERMA ----------- JUDGMENT The 27th April, 2016 The appellant by filing this appeal ...
Smt Sagarika Devi Alias Sagarika Prasad Vs. Vijay Kumar
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-27-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Transfer Petition (C) No. 1 of 2016 Smt. Sagarika Devi @ Sagarika Prasad w/o Vijay Kumar and D/o Sri Ganesh Prasad by faith Hindu, by occupation House Wife, R/o New Subhash Colony, Sanjay Path, Jai Prakash Nagar, Dimna Road, Road No. 6, PO and PS Mango, Distt. East Singhbhum, Jharkhand Petitioner Versus Vijay Kumar, S/o Sri Baban Prasad by faith Hindu, by occupation service, R/o Quarter No. D/T-2546, Dhurwa, PO and PS Dhurwa, Distt. Ranchi, Jharkhand Opposite Party --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA --------- For the Petitioner : M/s Ram Kishore Prasad & Praful Jojo, Advocates For the Respondent : Mr. Ashok Kumar Yadav, Advocate --------- 07/Dated:27/04/2016 This petition has been filed under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, by the petitioner-wife for transfer of Matrimonial Suit no. 16 of 2015, Miscellaneous Case no. 35 of 2013, Miscellaneous Case no. 36 of 2013 and Matrimonial Suit no. 38 of 2014 pending in ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »