Jharkhand Court November 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dheeraj Kumar Alias Dhiraj Kumar Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through Cb ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-21-2016
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B. A. No. 2110 of 2016 Dheeraj Kumar @ Dhiraj Kumar Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand through (C.B.I EOW, Ranchi) Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH For the Petitioner: Mr. Abhay Kr. Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr. Kripa Shankar Nanda, Advocate For the C.B.I : Mr. Kailash Prasad Deo, Advocate 09/Dated: 21/11/2016 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner is apprehending their arrest in connection with R.C. 06(A)/2013 AHDR, for the offence registered under Sections 120B, 420, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 13(2) read with Section 13(1) (d) P. C. Act. The prosecution case of prosecution as unfolded in the written report dated 09.08.2013 of Rajiv Ranjan, Superintendent of Police, C.B.I, EOW, Ranchi alleging inter alia that the Hon'ble High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi vide its order dated 14.06.2012 arising...
Santosh Kumar and Ors Vs. State of Bihar
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-21-2016
1 Cr. Appeal (DB) No.109 of 1992(R) Against the Judgment of conviction and Order of sentence dated 22.6.1992 passed by 1st Additional Judicial Commissioner, Ranchi, in Sessions Trial No.396 of 1989 / 296 of 1992. ------ 1. Santosh Kumar 2. Baidyanath Barnwal 3. Rani Devi Appellants -Versus- The State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) Respondent. -------- For the Appellants : Mr. Rajiv Kumar, Advocate Mr. A.S. Dayal, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shekhar Sinha, A.P.P. PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S.N. PATHAK --------- By Court: Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for the State.2. Appellants are the husband and the in-laws of the deceased and they are aggrieved by the Judgment of conviction and Order of sentence dated 22.6.1992 passed by the learned 1st Additional Judicial Commissioner, Ranchi, in Sessions Trial No.396 of 1989 / 296 of 1992, whereby the appellants have been convicted for the offences under Sections 304-B and 498-A of the I...
Manaur Azad Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-19-2016
Cr. A. (S.J.) No. 432 of 2003 (Against the judgment of conviction dated 29.01.2003 and order of sentence dated 30.01.2003 delivered by Sri Anil Kumar, the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.7, Hazaribagh, in S.T. No. 372 of 1989) ------ Manaur Azad, son of Md. Halim, resident of village N. T.S. Barkakana, Police Station Patratu, District Hazaribagh (JKharkhand) Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand Respondent ----- PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RATNAKER BHENGRA ------ For the Appellant : Mr. Arjun Narayan Deo For the State : Mr. Arun Kr. Pandey, A.P.P. -------- CAV on:29. 04.2016 Pronounced on: NOVEMBER, 2016 This Criminal Appeal has been preferred against the judgment of conviction dated 29.01.2003 and order of sentence dated 30.01.2003 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C, No. 7, Hazaribagh in connection with Sessions Trial Case No. 372 of 1989 corresponding to G.R. No. 501 of 1989 arising out of Patratu P.S. No. 73 of 1989, whereby the appellant wa...
Basudeo Prasad Yadav Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-19-2016
Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 871 of 2005 Against the Judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 3rd May 2005 passed by Sri Sunil Kumar Singh, Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-7th, Giridih in Sessions Trial No. 10 of 2004. Basudeo Pd. Yadav Appellants Versus The State of Jharkhand Respondent For the Appellant : Mr. Ram Lakhan Yadav, Advocate For the State : Mr. Azimuddin, A.P.P. PRESENT The Honble the Acting Chief Justice The Honble Mr. Justice Ananda Sen J U D G M E N T C.A.V. On 29/09/2016 Delivered on. /11/2016 Ananda Sen, J.The appellant Basudeo Pd. Yadav stood convicted for committing an offence punishable under Sections 364 (A)/ 120 B of the Indian Penal Code and further has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and also to pay a fine of Rs. 5000/-. The aforesaid judgment of conviction and order of sentence has been passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. 7th, Giridih on 3 rd May, 2005 in Sessions Trial No. 10 of 2004 (arising out o...
Krishna Gupta Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-19-2016
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (S.B.) No. 653 of 2003 (Against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 30 th April,2003 and 1st May, 2003 passed by the Additional Sessions JudgeXIII,Dhanbad in connection with S.T. No. 355 of 1991 arising out of Govindpur P.S. Case no. 71 of 1988 , G.R. no. 1032 of 1988) Krishna Gupta, son of Ganowri Sao R/o Village Fufuwadih, P.S. Gobindpur (Barbada), District Dhanbad Appellant -Versus- The State of Jharkhand ...... Respondent ------ CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RATNAKER BHENGRA ------ For the Appellant : Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Gauri Shankar Prasad,A.P.P. C.A.V. On:17. 05.2015 Delivered on:19.11.2016 RATNAKER BHENGRA,J This Criminal Appeal has been preferred against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 30.04.2003 and 01.05.2003 respectively passed by Shri Binay Kumar Sahay, Additional Sessions Judge XIII, Dhanbad in S.T. No. 355 of 1991 whereb...
Baleshwar Yadav Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-19-2016
Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 454 of 2006 Against the Judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 30 th January 2006 & 17th February, 2006 respectively, passed by Sri Sunil Kumar Singh, Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court-VII, Giridih in Sessions Trial No. 10(A) of 2004. Baleshwar Yadav Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand Respondent For the Appellant : Mr. Ram Lakhan Yadav, Advocate For the State : Mr. Azimuddin, A.P.P. P R E S E N T The Honble the Acting Chief Justice The Honble Mr. Justice Ananda Sen J U D G M E N T C.A.V. On 29/09/2016 Delivered on. /11/2016 Ananda Sen, J.The appellant Baleshwar Yadav stood convicted for committing an offence punishable under Sections 364 (A)/ 120 B of the Indian Penal Code and further has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and also to pay a fine of Rs. 3000/-. The aforesaid judgment of conviction and order of sentence has been passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. VII, Giridih on 30 th January, 2...
Nageshwar Ganjhu Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-18-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7340 of 2016 1. Sukhlal Tanti 2. Shiv Charan Tanti Petitioner(s) -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand ...Opp.Party CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR For the Petitioner(s) : - Mr. A.K.Chaturvedi, Advocate For the Opp. Party :- Mr. S.K.Deo, A.P.P. 04/18.11.2016 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioners are accused in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302/34/201 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case merely on the basis of suspicion. There is no eye-witness to the occurrence and the petitioners have been implicated on the basis of some vague statement given by the wife of the deceased. So far as similarly situated co-accused Saroj @ Suraj Singh Yadav @ Saroj Singh @ Suraj is concerned, he has already been enlarged on bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 05.10.2016 passed in ...
Ms Shree Balaji Metalik Through Its Proprietor Vijay Kumar Jain Vs. Th ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-18-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(Cr) No. 153 of 2015 --- M/s. Shree Balaji Metalik Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Superintendent of Police, Chaibasa 3. Maheshwar Prasad Singh, Assistant Sub Inspector of Police, Barajamda Outpost, Gua, Chaibasa Respondents --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Kalyan Roy, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Rahul Kumar Singh, J.C. to S.C. (L&C) --- Order No. 13 Dated 18th November, 2016 Heard Mr. Kalyan Roy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Rahul Kumar Singh, learned J.C. to S.C. (L&C) for the respondents. In this application, the petitioner has prayed for a direction upon the respondents to remove the lock from the factory gate which was put in connection with Gua (Barajamda) P.S. Case No. 09 of 2014 (G.R. No. 99 of 2014). It has been submitted by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that the petitioner's factory was registered under the Commercial Taxes Departme...
Dr. Sushila Saha Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-18-2016
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 1719 of 2004 Dr. Sushila Saha, wife of Sri Rajendra Prasad, resident of Rameshwaram, Bariatu Road, PO & PS Bariatu, Dist. Ranchi Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Registrar, Ranchi University, Ranchi 3. Vice Chancellor, Ranchi University, Ranchi 4. Principal, Karam Chand Bhagat College, Bero, PO & PS Bero, Dist. Ranchi 5. Education Secretary, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi 6. Joint Secretary, Human Resource Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR For the Petitioner : Mr. N. K. Pasari, Advocate For the RespondentState : Mr. Shamim Akhtar, GA III For the Respondent Nos. 2 to 4 : Mr. A. K. Mehta, Advocate Mr. Nikhil Kumar Mehta, Advocate 19/18.11.2016 Aggrieved of rejection of her claim for arrears of salary for the p...
Dilip Khalkho Vs. Union of India Through the Assistant Director Subsid ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-17-2016
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 2090 of 2014 Dilip Khalkho ..... Petitioner. Versus 1. Union of India through the Assistant Director, Subsidiary Intelligence Bureau (S.I.B.), Ministry of Home Affairs, Intelligence Bureau, Head Quarters, New Delhi.2. The Assistant Director, Subsidiary Intelligence Bureau (S.I.B.), Jamshedpur.3. The Assistant Director / E, Subsidiary Intelligence Bureau (S.I.B.), Itanagar, A. P.4. The Deputy Director, Subsidiary Intelligence Bureau (S.I.B.), Ranchi. .. Respondents -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S.N. PATHAK ------ For the Petitioner : M/s Abhay Kumar Mishra & M.K. Choubey, Advocates. For the respondent Union of India : Mr. Rajiv Sinha, A.S.G.I. -------- 07/ 17.11.2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Union of India.2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order 27th of September, 2013, passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench, [Circuit ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »