Skip to content

Jharkhand Court November 2016 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Nov 23 2016

Kiran Kumari Vs. Sharvan Jha and Anr

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Nov-23-2016

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI First Appeal (D.B.) No.45 of 2012 With First Appeal (D.B.) No.82 of 2012 --------------- F.A No.45 of 2012 Kiran Kumari . Appellant -Versus - 1. Sharvan Jha 2. Jharkhand Jha .. Respondents With F.A No.82 of 2012 1. Sharvan Jha 2. Jharkhand Jha .. Appellants -Versus- Kiran Kumari .. Respondent PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE Dr. S.N. PATHAK .. For Kiran Kumari : M/s Vandana Singh, Advocate. For Sharvan Jha & Anr. : M/s Sanjeev Thakur, Advocate. ..... Reserved on:23. 11.2016 Pronounced on:7. 12.2016 H.C. Mishra, J.- Heard learned counsels for the appellants and the learned counsel for the Respondents in both the cases.2. Both these appeals arise out of the common Judgment and Decree dated 13th February, 2012, passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Bokaro, in T.M.S. No.82 of 2005, filed by the petitioner Kiran Kumari, against her husband Sharvan Jha and her father-in-law, Jharkhand Jha, for annulment of t...


Nov 23 2016

Rohitash Choudhary Cisf No.103 Vs. Union of India and Ors

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Nov-23-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 6200 of 2011 Rohitash Choudhary CISF No.103211093, S/o Sri Banshi Dhar Choudhary, R/o village & P.O.-Chharsa via-Gathwadi, P.S.-Manoharpur, Tehsil-Shahpura, District-Jaipur, Rajasthan, PIN-303120. .... Petitioner Versus 1. Union of India through the Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi.2. Commandant, Central Industrial Security Forces (CISF), 8th Res. Bn., P.O. & P.S. Jaipur, Rajasthan.3. Inspector General, Central Industrial Security Forces (CISF), (Ministry of Home Affairs), CISF Office Campus, Eastern Zone Headquarter, Boring Road, Patna, P.O. & P.S.-Sachivayala, Patna (Bihar), PIN- 800 013 4. Commandant, Central Industrial Security Forces (CISF), (Ministry of Home Affairs), CISF Unit-Bhakokoli, BCCL Dhanbad, P.O.-Koyla Nagar, District-Dhanbad, Jharkhand.5. Assistant Commandant, Central Industrial Security Forces (CISF), (Ministry of Home Affairs), CISF Unit-Bhakokoli, BCCL Dhanbad, P.O.- Koyla Nagar, District-Dhanbad, Jharkhand. ...


Nov 23 2016

Gautam Kumar Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Nov-23-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No. 748 of 2015 with I.A. No. 6870 of 2016 Gautam Kumar son of Rabindra Pandey, Resident of Village Sighama P.O. Rupan P.S. Rupan District Nawada (Bihar) Petitioner/Appellant Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Ranchi, P.O. and P.S. Doranda District Ranchi (Jharkhand) 3. The Divisional Forest Officer, Ramgarh, P.O. and P.S. Ramgarh District Ramgarh (Jharkhand) ... ... Respondents/Respondents ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. PATEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RATNAKER BHENGRA ----- For the Appellant: Mr. Jay Prakash Pandey For the Respondents: M/s C. Prabha, S.C. IV Vishal Kr. Rai, J.C. to S.C. III ----- rd 06/Dated 23 November, 2016 Per D.N.Patel,J.I.A. No. 6870 of 2016 1. Present interlocutory application has been preferred under section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, for condonation of delay of 47 days in preferring this Letters Patent Appeal.2. Having heard counsel for the both sides and lookin...


Nov 23 2016

Debabrata Dutta and Anr Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Nov-23-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 1799 of 2015 --------- 1. Debabrata Dutta, S/o Late Sudhir Kumar Dutta.2. Nandika Dutta @ Nandita Dutta, W/o Sri Debabrata Dutta. Both residents of C/O M/S. D.N.B. Food Processing Pvt. Ltd. Nandlal Basu Sarini, College Para, P.O. & P.S.- Siliguri, Distt- Darjeeling, West Bengal. ... Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sunil Yadav, S/o Late Raja Ram Yadav, R/o Chaiti Durga Complex, National Gali, P.O. & P.S.-Kotwali, District- Ranchi. ... Opposite Parties --------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Jai Shankar Tripathi, Advocate Mr. Abhas Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the State : Mr. Abhinesh Kumar, A.P.P. For the O.P. No.2. : Mr. Abhishek Prasad, Advocate --------- 05/23.11.2016 Heard Mr. Jai Shankar Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Abhinesh Kumar, learned A.P.P. for the State as well as Mr. Abhishek Prasad, learned counsel for the Opposite Part...


Nov 22 2016

Pramod Kumar Jaiswal Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Nov-22-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 3857 of 2016 Pramod Kumar Jaiswal ....... Petitioner Vrs. 1.State of Jharkhand 2.Janak Dulari Bhagat 3.Shoba Bhagat 4.Pratima Jaiswal 5.Pratyush Kumar Jaiswal 6.Pratik Kumar Jaiswal 7.Priyanka Jaiswal 8.Manju Bhagat 9.Gaurav Bhagat 10.Shilpi Bhagat 11.Sujit Kumar Jaiswal 12.Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal 13.Niraj Kumar @ Niraj Kumar Jaiswal 14.Ranjit Kumar Jaiswal @ ranjit Prasad Jaiswal 15.Bharti Jaiswal 16.Jaishree Jaiswal 17.Bhavya Jaiswal 18.Shresth Jaiswal 19.Jayanti Jaiswal 20.Kaushik Jaiswal ..... Respondents .... CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Sidhhartha Roy For the Respondent : M/s Vikash Kishore Prasad,S.C.(L&C) : Ashish Kr. Thakur, J.C to S.C.(L&C) 04/22.11.2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Vikash Kishore Prasad, learned Standing Counsel, Land and Ceiling representing the State of Jharkhand is also present, though the State of Jharkhand does not appear to be party in the Suit ...


Nov 22 2016

Pawan Kumar Srivastava Vs. The State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Nov-22-2016

Criminal Revision No. 468 of 2015 Against the judgment dated 27.01.2015 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 40 of 2007 by learned Sessions Judge, Dhanbad affirming the judgment of conviction and the order of sentence dated 31.01.2007 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dhanbad in G.R. No. 1348 of 2002 Pawan Kumar Srivastava Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party ---- PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Sadhna Kumar, A.P.P. ---- By Court: Heard Mr. Rahul Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mrs. Sadhna Kumar, learned APP appearing for the State.2. This application is directed against the judgment of conviction and the order of sentence dated 31.01.2007 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dhanbad in G.R. No. 1348 of 2002 arising out of Baghmara (Sonardih) P.S. Case No. 103 of 2002, whereby the petitioner has been convicted for the offences pun...


Nov 22 2016

Archana Rana Alias Deepa Sharma Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Nov-22-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P No. 139 of 2016 Archana Rana @ Deepa Sharma @ Deepa wife of Ravi Kant Sharma daughter of Lalu Ranu, resident of New Town, Jamtara, P.O. and P.S. Jamtara, District- Jamtara, Jharkhand. ......... Petitioner. Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Bandana Sharma @ Guria, wife of Arvind Kumar, daughter of S.B. Sharma, resident of PF Flat near Plaza Market, P.O. and P.S. Telco, Town- Jamshedpur, District- Singhbhum East.3. Archana Kumari Sharma @ Sony, daughter of S.B. Sharma, resident of 79A, Patel Path, near Check Post Dimna Road, Mango, P.O. and P.S. Mango, Town- Jamshedpur, District- Singhbhum East. ...Opp. Parties. ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN. ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Lalit Yadav, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey-2, A.P.P. ...... 02/22.11.2016: In this petition, filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner has challenged the order dated 24.11.2015 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Jamtara, in ...


Nov 22 2016

Pankaj Jaiswal Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Nov-22-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 774 of 2016 Pankaj Jaiswal .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Ganga Rajak Opposite Parties --- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioner : Mrs. Ritu Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Deepak Kumar, APP For O.P. No. 2 : Mr. K. P. Deo, Advocate & Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Advocate --- Order No. 02 Dated 22nd November, 2016 Heard Mrs. Ritu Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr. Deepak Kumar learned APP appearing for the State as also Mr. K. P. Deo, learned counsel for the opposite party No.2. In this application, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the entire criminal proceedings in connection with Complaint Case No. 1630 of 2015 including the order dated 19.01.2016 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi, whereby and whereunder, cognizance has taken for the offences punishable u/s 323/504 of the I.P.C. and Section 3(i)(x) of the Scheduled Caste and the Scheduled Tribe...


Nov 22 2016

Dr Sukhdeo Singh and Anr Vs. Human Resources Department

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Nov-22-2016

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 813 of 2015 1. Dr. Sukhdeo Singh, Son of Shri Baikunth Singh, resident of VillageDharampur, PO Nawagarh Chatti, via Markacho, PS Dhanwar, Dist. Giridih 2. Dr. Naresh Prasad Roy, Son of Shri Sadhu Sharan Roy, resident of New Barganda, Giridih, PO, PS & Dist. Giridih Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, PO & PS Dhurwa, Dist. Ranchi 3. Adarsh College, Raj Dhanwar, through its Secretary having its Office at Adarsh College, PO & PS Raj Dhanwar, Dist. Giridih 4. Vinoba Bhave University, Hazaribagh through its Registrar, Hazaribagh having its office at PO, PS & Dist. Hazaribagh 5. The Vice Chancellor, Vinoba Bhave University, Hazaribagh having its office at PO, PS & Dist. Hazaribagh 6. The Registrar, Vi...


Nov 22 2016

Ram Pukar Sharma and Anr Vs. Human Resources Department

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Nov-22-2016

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 750 of 2015 1. Ram Pukar Sharma, son of Late Karan Singh, resident of Saria, PO & PS Saria, Dist. Giridih 2. Dr. Siddeshwar Prasad Singh, son of Late Kameshwar Singh, resident of Shivalaya Colony, Goal Building More, PO K.G. Asharam, PS Saraidhela, Dist. Dhanbad Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Secretary, Department of Human Resources Development, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi, having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, PO & PS Dhurwa, Dist. Ranchi 3. Vinoba Bhave University, Hazaribagh through its Registrar, Hazaribagh having its office at PO,PS & Dist. Hazaribagh 4. The Vice Chancellor, Vinoba Bhave University, Hazaribagh, having its office at PO, PS & Dist. Hazaribagh 5. The Registrar, Vinoba Bhave University, Hazaribagh having its office at PO, PS & Dist. Hazaribagh 6. The Secretary, Jharkhand Public Service Commiss...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial