Jharkhand Court November 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Tanis Uraon @ Tanis Lakra and Ors Vs. State of Bihar
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-28-2016
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Appeal (D.B.) No. 148 of 1992(R) (Against the Judgment of conviction dated 24.07.1992 and order of sentence dated 25.07.1992 passed by learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Palamau, in Sessions Trial No.150 of 1988) ----------- 1. Tanis Uraon @ Tanis Lakra 2. Antonish Uraon @ Antonish Lakra @ Chutia Lakra 3. Illias Uraon @ Allias Lakra 4. Kilman Uraon @ Kilman Lakra . . . Appellants --Versus-- The State of Bihar (now Jharkhand) . . . Respondent For the Appellants : Mr. P.P.N. Roy, Sr. Advocate Ms. Pragati Prasad, Advocate For the State : Mr. H.P. Singh, A.P.P. ----- PRESENT : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S.N. PATHAK --------- By Court:- It is submitted that the appellant No.-3 Illias Uraon @ Allias Lakra died on18.10.1994, during pendency of this appeal. The death certificate of the appellant has been brought on record by filing supplementary affidavit. In view of the death certificate, this appeal abates as...
Somnath Das Vs. Sheoli Hati
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-28-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI F. A. No. 59 of 2016 with F.A. No. 68 of 2016 Ms. Sheoli Hati ..... Appellant [ In F. A. No. 59 of 2016] Somnath Das ..... Appellant [ In F. A. No. 68 of 2016] Versus Somnath Das ..... Respondent [ In F. A. No. 59 of 2016] Ms. Sheoli Hati ..... Respondent [ In F. A. No. 68 of 2016] -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S.N. PATHAK ------ For the Appellant : Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate [ In F. A. No. 59 of 2016] : M/s Vinod Kanth, Sr. Advocate & Vandana Singh, Advocate [ In F. A. No. 68 of 2016] For the respondent : M/s Vinod Kanth, Sr. Advocate & Vandana Singh, Advocate [ In F. A. No. 59 of 2016] : Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate [ In F. A. No. 68 of 2016] -------- 09/ 28.11.2016 Both these appeals have been filed, challenging the common Judgment and Decree dated 31.3.2016, passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Jamshedpur, in Guardianship Case No. 11 of 2012, in which, both the side were at li...
Ms Sheoli Hati Vs. Somnath Das
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-28-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI F. A. No. 59 of 2016 with F.A. No. 68 of 2016 Ms. Sheoli Hati ..... Appellant [ In F. A. No. 59 of 2016] Somnath Das ..... Appellant [ In F. A. No. 68 of 2016] Versus Somnath Das ..... Respondent [ In F. A. No. 59 of 2016] Ms. Sheoli Hati ..... Respondent [ In F. A. No. 68 of 2016] -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S.N. PATHAK ------ For the Appellant : Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate [ In F. A. No. 59 of 2016] : M/s Vinod Kanth, Sr. Advocate & Vandana Singh, Advocate [ In F. A. No. 68 of 2016] For the respondent : M/s Vinod Kanth, Sr. Advocate & Vandana Singh, Advocate [ In F. A. No. 59 of 2016] : Mr. Anurag Kashyap, Advocate [ In F. A. No. 68 of 2016] -------- 09/ 28.11.2016 Both these appeals have been filed, challenging the common Judgment and Decree dated 31.3.2016, passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Jamshedpur, in Guardianship Case No. 11 of 2012, in which, both the side were at li...
Jay Ram Prasad Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through Its Chief Secretary ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-28-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI L. P. A. No.362 of 2016 Jay Ram Prasad, S/o Moti Paswan ..... Appellant(s) Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand, through its Chief Secretary, Project Building, P.O. & P.S.:-Dhurwa, Distt:- Ranchi.2. Director General cum Inspector General of Police, Jharkhand, Ranchi, Project Building, P.O. & P.S.:-Dhurwa, Distt:- Ranchi.3. Deputy Inspector General of Police, Singhbhum (Kolhan Range), Chaibasa, P.O. & P.S.:-Chaibasa, Distt :-West Singhbhum.4. Sr. Superintendent of Police, Jamshedpur, P.O. & P.S.:- Sakchi, Distt :- East Singhbhum. . Respondent(s) CORAM : HONBLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN For the Appellant(s) : M/s A. K. Sahani, Advocate Ajit Kr., Vikesh Kr, Advocates. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Vikash Kumar, JC to AAG ----- Order No.4, Dated 28.11.2016.1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the appellant and learned counsel appearing for the Respondents.2. In this Letters Patent Appeal, the appellant/petitioner has challenged...
Bhanu Pratap Singh Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-28-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 1244 of 2016 --------- Bhanu Pratap Singh, S/o Raj Kumar Singh, R/o Village- Mukru, P.O.- Jarba & P.S.- Mandu, District- Dhanbad. ... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Krishna Kumar Singh, S/o Late Gobardhan Singh, R/o Village- Bargadda, P.O. & P.S.- Katkamsandi, District- Hazaribag ... Opp. Parties --------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --------- For the Petitioner : Ms. Vandana Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Abhay Kr. Tiwari, A.P.P. For the O.P. No.2. : Mr. Hemant Kr. Shikarwar, Advocate --------- 06/28.11.2016 Heard Ms. Vandana Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Abhay Kr. Tiwari, learned A.P.P. for the State as well as Mr. Hemant Kr. Shikarwar, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no.2. In this application the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the order dated 18.05.2016 passed by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Hazaribag in Criminal Revision N...
Amiya Kumar Mishra Vs. State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-25-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 338 of 2011 --- Amiya Kumar Mishra son of Late Janardan Mishra, Senior Branch Manager, Vijaya Bank, 49 K. K. Tagore Street, Kolkata 700007, State West Bengal at present residing at 49, K. K. Tagore Street, Kolkata 700007 State West Bengal Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sri Ram Krishna Ram, son of Ram Prasad Ram, resident of Quarter No. 171, Shayamli Colony, ( Mecon Colony), P. S. and P. S. Doranda, District Ranchi ... Opposite Parties --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioner : Dr. M. K. Laik, Sr. Advocate For the State : Mr. V. K. Tiwary, A.P.P. For the O.P. No. 2 : None --- 06/25.11.2016 Heard Dr. M. K. Laik, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. V. K. Tiwary, learned A.P. P. No one appears on behalf of the opposite party no. 2 in spite of valid service of notice. In this application the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the entire criminal proceedin...
Birendra Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-25-2016
. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ---- W.P.(S) No. 1254 of 2007 ---- Birendra Singh, son of Nathuni Singh, resident of village- Okhni, P.S. Hazaribagh Sadar, District- Hazaribagh . Petitioner -Versus- 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.The Secretary, Department of Law (Justice), Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 3.The District and Sessions Judge, Hazaribagh 4.The Registrar, Civil Court, Hazaribagh, District- Hazaribagh . Respondents . CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR ---- For the Petitioner : Mr. Saurav Arun, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ajit Kumar, A.A.G Mr. K. Sundaram, JC to AAG ---- 12/ 25.11.2016 Heard.2. Whether a fresh enquiry can be ordered if the disciplinary authority records a finding that the enquiry report is not convincing and appears to be vague, is the sole question involved in the writ-petition.3. By now, law on this issue is well-settled. Normally, two situations may arise in a departmental proceeding viz; (i) the disciplinary authority agrees with the f...
Subodh Kant Sahai Alias Subodh Kant Sahay Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-25-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 856 of 2016 --- Subodh Kant Sahai @ Subodh Kant Sahay S/o Late Brijdeo Sahai, resident of Quarter No.-E39, Sector III, Dhurwa, PO & PS Dhurwa, Dist. Ranchi-1 Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Pratyush Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Vinay Kumar Tiwary, A.P.P. --- 6/25.11.2016 Heard Mr. Pratyush Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Vinay Kumar Tiwary, learned A.P.P. for the State.2. In this application the petitioner has prayed for quashing the entire criminal proceeding in connection with Kotwali (Hindpirhi) P. S. Case No. 168 of 2004 corresponding to G. R. No. 973 of 2004 including the order dated 18.08.2011 passed by the learned Sri S. K. Chandra, Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi by virtue of which cognizance has been taken for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 188, ...
State of Jharkhand Vs. Binod Singh and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-24-2016
Govt.Appeal No. 07 of 2001 with Criminal Revision No. 150 of 2001 .. Against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 5.3.2001 passed by 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Chatra in Sessions Trial No.354 of 1994 Govt.Appeal No. 07 of 2001 The State of Jharkhand ... Appellant -Versus- 1. Binod Singh 2. Shyamdeo Singh 3. Ratan Singh 4. Satan Singh @ Satya Narayan Singh 5. Rajdeo Singh @ Satya Narayan Singh ... Respondents . For the Appellant : Mr.Pankaj Kumar, APP For the Respondents: Mr.A.K.Kashyap,Sr.Advocate Criminal Revision No. 150 of 2001 Chandra Kishore . Petitioner -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Chandra Deo Singh 3. Ratan Singh 4. Shyamdeo Singh 5. Satyanarayan Singh 6. Rajdeo Singh @ Raja 7. Binod Singh ... Opp.Parties . For the Petitioner : M/s O.P.Singh & S.Rahman, Advocates For the State : Mr.Pankaj Kumar, APP. PRESENT HONBLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE ANANDA SEN CAV on 10.11.2016 Pronounced on 24.11.2016 Pradip Kumar Mohanty,A.C.J- The Government Appeal ...
Chandra Kishore Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Nov-24-2016
Govt.Appeal No. 07 of 2001 with Criminal Revision No. 150 of 2001 .. Against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 5.3.2001 passed by 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Chatra in Sessions Trial No.354 of 1994 Govt.Appeal No. 07 of 2001 The State of Jharkhand ... Appellant -Versus- 1. Binod Singh 2. Shyamdeo Singh 3. Ratan Singh 4. Satan Singh @ Satya Narayan Singh 5. Rajdeo Singh @ Satya Narayan Singh ... Respondents . For the Appellant : Mr.Pankaj Kumar, APP For the Respondents: Mr.A.K.Kashyap,Sr.Advocate Criminal Revision No. 150 of 2001 Chandra Kishore . Petitioner -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Chandra Deo Singh 3. Ratan Singh 4. Shyamdeo Singh 5. Satyanarayan Singh 6. Rajdeo Singh @ Raja 7. Binod Singh ... Opp.Parties . For the Petitioner : M/s O.P.Singh & S.Rahman, Advocates For the State : Mr.Pankaj Kumar, APP. PRESENT HONBLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE ANANDA SEN CAV on 10.11.2016 Pronounced on 24.11.2016 Pradip Kumar Mohanty,A.C.J- The Government Appeal ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »