Jharkhand Court January 2016 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

AI Brief & Ask
Semantic AI Search
Devil's Bench

Try free for 7 days Semantic AI Search

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jan 22 2016

Anand Mahato and Ors Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Jan-22-2016

1 Cr. Appeal (DB) No.1080 of 2006 with Cr. Appeal (DB) No.968 of 2006 (Against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 05.06.2006 and 06.06.2006 respectively, passed by Sri Indradeo Misra, Addl. Sessions JudgeVI, Dhanbad in connection with Sessions Trial No.577 of 2004, corresponding to G.R. No.954 of 2004 arising out of Baghmara (Kharkhare) P.S. Case No.102 of 2004) 1. Sumia Devi @ Suma Devi @ Sumitra Devi 2. Gokul Mahto ............. Appellants (in Cr.Appeal (DB) No.1080 of 2006) 3. Anand Mahato 4. Ramesh Mahato 5. Rita Devi ............. Appellants (in Cr.Appeal (DB) No.968 of 2006) Versus The State of Jharkhand Respondent PRESENT: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. UPADHYAY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RATNAKER BHENGRA For the Appellants : Mr. A.N. Deo, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Azeemuddin, A.P.P. (in Cr.Appeal (DB) No.1080 ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 2016

Sumia Devi ? Suma Devi Alias Sumitra Devi and Anr. Vs. State of Jharkh ...

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Jan-22-2016

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 2016

Bhutali Alias Murli Paswan and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Jan-22-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 59 of 2013 with Cont. Case (Civil) No.160 of 2013 with Cont. Case (Civil) No.186 of 2013 with Cont. Case (Civil) No.189 of 2013 with Cont. Case (Civil) No.232 of 2013 with Cont. Case (Civil) No.292 of 2013 with Cont. Case (Civil) No.317 of 2013 with Cont. Case (Civil) No.325 of 2013 with Cont. Case (Civil) No.344 of 2013 with Cont. Case (Civil) No.416 of 2013 with Cont. Case (Civil) No.423 of 2013 with Cont. Case (Civil) No.465 of 2013 with I.A. Nos. 4840 of 2014, 4837 of 2014, 4834 of 2014, 4838 of 2014, 4841 of 2014, 4831 of 2014, 4833 of 2014, 4832 of 2014, 4836 of 2014, 4835 of 2014, 4842 of 2014 & 4839 of 2014 -------- Cont. Case (Civil) No. 59 of 2013: Jhapsi Das son of Late Bhado Das resident of Village-Bandar Jori, Harijan Colony (C.J.M. Colony) Near Commissioner's Residence, Dumka, PO- Dumka, PS- Dumka Town, District- Dumka ... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Shri B.K. Tripathy son of not known to p...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 2016

Ram Kewal Soni Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Jan-22-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 102 of 2005 ----------- Ram Kewal Soni, Son of late Ram Briksha Sahu, Resident of Mohalla- Amlatoli, Lohardaga, P.O. P.S. and District-Lohardaga. ..Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. .Opposite Party ----- Coram: HONBLE MR JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. A.S. Dayal, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vijay Shankar Prasad, APP ----- 06/22.01.2016 In this application, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 17.01.2005, passed in Cr. Appeal No.9/2004, whereby and whereunder a direction was given to the learned trial court to alter the charge with specific material against each of the accused since there has been a glaring defect in framing the charge.2. A first information report was instituted by one Kailash Bihari Mahto, in which allegation was made with respect to the robbery committed in the house of the informant by breaking open the window and taking away various articles at gunpoint.3. Ba...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 2016

Pabitra Banerjee Vs. The State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Jan-22-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 808 of 2014 Pabitra Banerjee, son of late Bhola Nath Banerjee .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Prabhat Kumar Verma Opposite Parties --- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Prasad, Advocate For the State : Mr. Amaresh Kumar, APP For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Shailesh, Advocate --- Order No. 06 Dated 22nd January , 2016 1. In this application, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 23.7.2013 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad in C.P. Case No. 1088 of 2013, whereby and whereunder, the cognizance has taken for the offence punishable u/s 138 Negotiable Instrument Act (N.I. Act for short).2. A compliant case was instituted by the opposite party No. 2, wherein it was alleged that the complainant/ opposite party No. 2 had supplied goods to the petitioner on credit and ultimately an amount of Rs 6,64,836/- became due against the petitioner. The petiti...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 2016

Shanichar Oraon and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Jan-22-2016

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 2016

Arun Bek and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Jan-22-2016

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 2016

Vijay Parasram Puria Alias Vijay Agrawal @Vijay Parashram Puria Vs. Th ...

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Jan-22-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 2222 of 2015 --- Vijay Parasram Puria @ Vijay Agrawal, @ Vijay Parshuram Puria, Son of Sri Shyam Sundar Parasram Puria, resident of Harmu Road, Ranchi, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Sukhdeo Nagar, District Ranchi Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Block Supply Officer, Chanho P.O. & P.S. Chanho Distt. Ranchi Opp. Parties --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ashish Jha, A.P.P. --- C.A.V. on 21.01.2016 Pronounced on 22/01/2016 In this application the petitioner has prayed for quashing the entire criminal proceedings instituted in connection with Ratu P.S. Case No. 176 of 2015 which has been instituted under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act.2. The allegation which has been made in the First Information Report instituted by the Block Supply Officer, Chanho is to the effect that in terms of the direction of the Sub Divisional Officer ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 2016