Jharkhand Court September 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Employer in Relation to the Management of Food Corporation of India Vs ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-11-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(L) No. 2735 of 2015 Employer in relation to the Management of Food Corporation of India, through its Area Manager, Brajesh Kumar, son of Jagdish Paswan, District Office, Chiragora, PO & P.SHirapur, District Dhanbad Petitioner Versus Bhopal Tiwary, son of Late Choudray Tiwary, resident of Village Kollahabad, P.SJasidih, DistrictDeoghar, Jharkhand ... ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Nipun Bakshi For the Respondent: Mrs. M.M.Pal, Sr. Adv. 06/11.09.2015 Aggrieved by the award dated 18.7.2014 passed in Reference Case No. 75/2005, whereby the petitioner has been directed to reinstate the concerned workman in service, the present writ petition has been filed. 2. The FCI is a statutory body constituted under the Food Corporations Act, 1964. The F...
Ram Kumar Rai Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-11-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. No.812 of 2015 Ram Kumar Rai @ R. K. Rai, S/o Indradev, R/o Qr. No.104, A.N.2, New Ranikudar, Kadma, P.O. & P.S. - Kadma, Town - Jamshedpur, District East Sinbhbhum ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Mr. Arpan Mishra & Mr. Amitabh Prasad, Advocates For the State : A.P.P For the Complainant : Mr. Bibhash Sinha, Advocate --------- th 05/Dated:11. September, 2015 I.A. No.4980 of 2015 The instant interlocutory application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner with a prayer to exempt the petitioner from surrendering in the court below.2. Learned counsel, for the petitioner, has submitted that the petitioner and the complainant, Baidyanath Singh have compromised the case. He has also referred to the decision in the case of Vivek Rai & Anr. Vs. High Court of Jharkhand through Registrar General & Ors. in ...
Lila Soren Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-11-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7151of 2015 Md. Nishar . .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party --- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. S. P. Roy, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Sadhna Kumar, APP --- Order No. 02 Dated 11th September , 2015 Heard Mr. S. P. Roy, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mrs. Sadhna Kumar, learned APP appearing for the State. Petitioner is an accused in connection with S.T. No. 68 of 2015 arising out of Mahagama P.S. Case No. 30 of 2015 corresponding to G.R. No. 323 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable u/s 395 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the F.I.R. has been instituted against unknown persons and subsequently on the basis of confessional statement of Nasim Ansari, the name of petitioner has surfaced. It has further been submitted that neither has the petitioner been put on T.I.P. ...
Prakash Poddar Vs. Steel Authority of India and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-11-2015
W.P.(S) No. 1462 of 2011 --- In the matter of an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India Prakash Poddar --- --- ---- Petitioner Versus 1. Steel Authority of India Limited through its General Manager, SAIL, Bokaro Steel City, Bokaro 2. Deputy General Manager (Mech-CRM), Steel Authority of India Limited, Bokaro Steel City, Bokaro --- --- Respondents --- For the Petitioner: Mr. M.B. Lal & Mr. Sudarshan Shrivastava, Advocates For the Respondents: Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, Sr. Advocate, Shresth Gautam, Advocate --- Present The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh --- By Court: Heard counsel for the parties.2. Petitioner has been imposed with punishment of reduction to the minimum of the Grade i.e. existing grade S-9 Rs. 11,400-3%-Rs. 19,350/ to Rs. 11,400/ with immediate effect by the impugned order dated 30.09.2010 (Annexure-5) passed by the Deputy General manager (Mech-CRM). This punishment order is passed as a result of finding of guilt arrived at in respect of theft of prop...
Rita Kumari and Anr Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-11-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1155 of 2015 --- 1. Rita Kumari, Wife of Sri Ajay Kumar 2. Ankit Kumar, Son of Sri Ajay Kumar, both residents of Road No. 4, Shankosai, Dimna Road, P.O. & P.S. Mango, Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Smt. Anita Dey, Rakshit wife of Late B. Rakshit Resident Flat No. 2/1, Block A Prince Complex Kagalnagar P.O. Sonari, P. S. Sonari Town Jamshedpur, District Singhbhum East, State Jharkhand Opp. Parties --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vijay Kumar Gupta, A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Tejo Mistry, Advocate --- 02/11.09.2015 Heard Mr. Manish Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr. Vijay Kumar Gupta, learned A.P.P. for the State assisted by Mr. Tejo Mistry, learned counsel appearing for the informant. Petitioners have prayed for grant of anticipatory bail, as they are apprehe...
Shyam Nureman and Anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-11-2015
1 REPORTABLE IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No.412 of 2001 1. Shyam Nureman 2. Raj Kishore Singh Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party For the Petitioners : Mr. Jai Prakash Pandey, Advocate With Cr. Revision No.487 of 2001 Abdul Salam Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party With Cr. Revision No.106 of 2002 Dhari Sao Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party With Cr. Revision No.275 of 2002 1. Sushil Soren 2. Natwa Soren 3. Saheb Soren Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party For the Petitioners : Mr. Rajeeva Sharma, Sr. Advocate & Mr. V.Roy, Advocate With Cr. Revision No.542 of 2003 Sarju Ram Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party For the Petitioner : M/s. Rajeev Kumar, Advocate & Ram Lakhan Yadav, Advocates With Cr. Revision No.585 of 2004 Shiv Narayan Singh Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party With Cr. Revision No.889 of 2004 Tapeshwar Vi...
Jainul Abedin and Anr Vs. Meraj Ahmed and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-11-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 3824 of 2014 1. JAINUL ABEDIN SON OF LATE ABDUL HAMID2 MD. SHAMSHER SON OF LATE FAKIR MOHD. BOTH R/O HOLDING NO.39, LINE NO.4, ABLOCK DHATKIDIH PO AND PS BISTUPUR, DISTT. EAST SINGHBHUM ... PETITIONERS VERSUS1 MERAJ AHMED SON OF LATE HAZI MOHD. NAZIR AHMAD R/O HOLDING NO. 11, LINE NO. 3 BBLOCK, DHATKIDIH PO AND PS BISTUPUR, DISTT EAST SINGHBHUM 2. MRS. HALIMA KHATOON WIFE OF IFTEYKAR AHMED R/O HOLDING NO. 68, LINE NO. 7 ABLOCK, DHATKIDIH PO AND PS BISTUPUR DIST EAST SINGHBHUM3 ANWARI BEGUM WIFE OF SAYEED YUNUS R/O ROAD NO. 9, AZAD BASTI, MANGO PO AND PS MANGO DIST EAST SINGHBHUM4 QUAMARUDDIN NISSA DAUGHTER OF FAKIR MOHAMMAD R/O ROAD NO. 9, AZAD NAGAR MANGO PO AND PS MANGO DIST EAST SINGHBHUM . RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR FOR THE PETITIONERS : MR. RAJIV RANJAN, SR. ADV MR. SHRESTHA GAUTAM, ADV. FOR RESPONDENTS : MR. KALYAN BANERJEE, ADV. 8/ D...
Chitranjan Choudhary and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-10-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 226 of 2015 1. Chitranjan Choudhary 2. Umesh Choudhary, both sons of Late Chet Lal Choudhary 3. Sunil Choudhary, son of Chitranjan Coudhary 4. Ajay Choudhary, son of Umesh Choudhary 5. Sita Ram Prasad, son of Nun Mani Mahto 6. Punit Mahto, son of Late Guli Choudhary 7. Pokhan Choudhary, son of Late Dhanuki Choudhary 8. Ramchander Choudhary, son of Dashu Choudhary, All residents of village & PO- Chuglamo, PS Barkatha, District- Hazaribagh, Except no.5 resident of village & PO Barkangango, PS Barkatha, District- Hazaribagh . Petitioner(s) -V e r s u s- 1. State of Jharkhand 2. Babu Lal Paswan, son of Late Bihari Paswan 3. Mohini Devi, wife of Babu Lal Paswan O.P.nos. 2 and 3 are residents of village & PO- Chuglamo, PS Barkatha, District- Hazaribagh . ... Opposite Parties CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI NATH VERMA For the Petitioner(s) : - M/s. Sarju Prasad, Sahdeo Choudhary & Shiv Prasad, Advocates For the State : - Mr. Mukesh K...
Kalimuddin and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-10-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No.1181 of 2014 ------------ 1. Kalimuddin Ansari, S/o Late Khatir Mian 2. Shamshewr Ansari, S/o Late Khatir Mian 3. Altu Ansari, S/o Late Khatir Mian 4. Rafiq Ansari, S/o Kalim Ansari 5. Manjhla Ansari 6. Munna Ansari Both S/o Kalimuddin Ansari 7. Asirapa Bibi W/o Kalimuddin Ansari 8. Aslima Bibi, W/o Shamshewr Ansari All R/o Village & P.O.- Bhitia, P.S. Govindpur, District- Dhanbad ... ... Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Shahid Ansari, S/o Gedu Mian, R/o Village & P.O.- Bhitia, P.S. Govindpur, District- Dhanbad ------------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI NATH VERMA For the Petitioners : Mr. Milan Kumar Dey, Sr. Advocate Ms. Leena Mukherjee, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. For the O.P.No.2 : Mr. Sanjay Prasad, Advocate ------------ C.A.V. ON:15. 07.2015 PRONOUNCED ON:- 10.09.2015 The petitioners have questioned the legality of the order dated 21.11.2014 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-V, Dhanbad in Cr....
Tahir Mian and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-10-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No.136 of 2015 ------------ 1. Tahir Mian, S/o Mokhtar Mian 2. Mokhtar Mian, S/o Hanif Mian 3. Rauf Ansari @ Rauf Mian, S/o Mokhtar Mian 4. Sahina Baz @ Sahina Bano, D/o Mokhtar Mian 5. Saidi Bibi @ Sazda Bibi, W/o Mokhtar Mian All residents of Village- Sohdag Khurd, P.O. + P.S.-Bishrampur District- Palamau (Jharkhand) ... ... Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Amna Bibi, D/o Wazir Mian, Resident of Village- Sirma, P.O. + P.S. Patan, District- Palamau (Jharkhand) ... ... ... Opp. Parties ------------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI NATH VERMA For the Petitioners : Mr. Faruque Ansari, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. For the O.P.No.2 : Mr. Vijay Kumar Gupta, Advocate Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate ------------ C.A.V. ON:- 19.05.2015 PRONOUNCED ON:- 10.09.2015 The question which falls for determination in the instant criminal revision application is whether a matrimonial dispute resulting in conviction of the petitioners at the...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »