Jharkhand Court September 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Smt Madhuri Goswami and Anr Vs. Rabindra Nath Goswami
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-16-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No.- 284 of 2015 1. Smt. Madhuri Goswami, wife of Rabindra Nath Goswami, D/o- Sri Laxmi Narayan Gosami, resident of village and PO- Bharra, PS- Chas, District- Bokaro 2. Rajbir Goswami, son of Rabindranath Goswami, represented by his mother and natural guardian Madhuri Goswami, resident of village and PO- Bharra, PS- Chas, District- Boakro . Petitioner(s) -V e r s u s- Rabindra Nath Goswami, son of Sri Debu Lal Goswami, resident of Goswami Tola, Balidih, PO and PS- Balidih, District- Bokaro . ... Opposite Party For the petitioners :- Mrs. Vandana Singh, Advocate For the O.P. :- None CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI NATH VERMA ----------- C.A.V. ON:27. 07/2015 PRONOUNCED ON-16/09/2015 Calling in question the legal validity of the order dated 22.01.2015 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Bokaro in Maintenance Case No. 98 of 2013 whereby and whereunder the learned court below has declined to grant maintenance to the pe...
Bhanu Pratap Sahi Vs. State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-16-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.604 of 2008 Bhanu Pratap Sahi ..... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Lal Kishore Nath Shahdeo . Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ashok Kumar, A. P.P. For the Opposite Party No.2: Mr. A.K. Sahani, Advocate ----- 7/16.09.2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State as also learned counsel for the opposite party No.2.2. Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 4.4.2008 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi, in complaint case No.1146 of 2007, whereby, on the basis of allegations in the complaint petition, the statement of the complainant on solemn affirmation and the statements of the witnesses examined in the enquiry stage, cognizance has been taken against the petitioner for the offence under Sections 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. the petitioner has also prayed for quashin...
Sajema Bibi and Anr Vs. State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-16-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Revision No. 700 of 2010 1. Sajema Bibi Wife of Basir Sheikh, daughter of Saifuddin Sheikh 2. Sahina Praveen Daughter of Basir Sheikh represented through mother Sajema Bibi Both residents of village Islampur, PO & PS Pakur, Dist.-Pakur . . Petitioners --Versus-- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Basir Sheikh, son of Namder Sheikh, resident of village Bhawanipur (Farsa), PO & PS- Pakur, District- Pakur . . Opposite Parties For the petitioners :- M/s. Lakhan Chandra Roy & Bijoy Kumar Pandey, Advocates For the O.P. No.2 :- M/s. Md. Asadul Haque & Gautam Kumar, Advocates For the State:- :- Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Add.P.P. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI NATH VERMA ----------- C.A.V. ON:03. 08/2015 PRONOUNCED ON-16/09/2015 The petitioner Sajema Bibi and her minor daughter Sahina Praveen have preferred this revision against the order dated 09.03.2010 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Pakur in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 107 of 2007 whereby...
Sandeep Pradhan Alias Sandip Pradhan Alias Thapa Vs. The State of Jhar ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-16-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ---- Cr. Appeal (DB) No.22 of 2015 ------ Sandeep Pradhan @ Sandip Pradhan @ Thapa, son of late Jaikishor Pradhan, Resident of Lah Kothi, Ratu Road, PO -Hehal, PS-Sukhdeonagar, Dist.-Ranchi, Jharkhand .. .... ............. .. ... Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand .. .. ... .... Respondent ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIRENDER SINGH, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT ------ For the Petitioner : M/s Abhay Kumar Singh, Senior Advocate Rakesh Kumar, Rakesh Kumar Samrendra, Advocates For the State : Mr. Hardeo Prasad Singh, A.P.P. ------ 10/ Dated:16. hSeptember, 2015 Per Virender Singh, C.J.: In all, nine accused faced trial including the appellant. Three out of them, namely Krishna Yadav, Manoj Paswan and Santosh Yadav have earned acquittal whereas remaining six stand convicted for the charge under Section 302/34 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act, vide impugned judgment of learned Judicial Commissioner-IV, Ranchi, dated 29...
Ranjeet Kumar Vs. Road Construction
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-16-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 3094 of 2015 --- Ranjeet Kumar --- --- ---- Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand 3. Superintending Engineer, Abhiyantran Bhawan 4. Executive Engineer, NH Division, Ranchi 5. Abhay Kumar Roy, Sub Divisional Officer, NH Sub Division, Ranchi 6. Binay Prakash Singh, Superintending Engineer, NH Circle, Abhiyantran Bhawan, Ranchi 7. Vigilance Bureau, Jharkhand through its Inspector General, Vigilance --- --- --- Respondents --- CORAM: The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitioner: M/s M.S. Anwar, Sr. Advocate, Afaque Ahmad, Altaf Hussain, Shadab Bin Haque, Advocates For the Resp-State: Mr. Dhananjay Kr.Dubey, Sr.SC-I and Mr. Aashish Kumar Thakur, JC to Sr. SC-I --- 09/ 16.09.2015 Heard counsel for the parties.2. The petitioner aggrieved with an order of transfer (Annexure-7) dated 01.07.2015 issued by the Superintending Engineer, National Highways C...
Mahendra Singh ? Sukar Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-16-2015
1 Criminal (Jail) Appeal (D.B) No.1003 of 2005 --- Against the judgment of conviction dated 18.5.2005 and order of sentence dated 19.5.2005 passed by the Additional Judicial Commissioner, FTC No.X, Ranchi in S.T.No.187 of 2003. Mahendra Singh @ Sukar Singh....................................................Appellant VERSUS State of Jharkhand ......................................... ........................Respondent For the Appellant: Mr. Sunil Agrawal, Amicus Curiae For the State :Mr.S.K.Deo, APP P R E S E N T THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK BY Court: The appellant was put on trial on the accusation of committing murder of his wife Chercheri Devi. The court having found the appellant guilty for the said charge convicted him for the offence punishable under Section 302, vide its judgment dated 18.5.2005 and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life, vide its order dated 19.5.2005. The case of the prosecution is that on 25.7.2002 while th...
Aditya Tomar Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-16-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 58 of 2015 Aditya Tomar, Son of Randhir Singh Tomar, resident of 645/1, G.M.S. Road, Baliawala Chowk, PO Dehradun, PS Basant Vihar, Dist. Dehradun (Uttrakhand) . Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Kanak Tomar, W/o Aditya Tomar, resident of Qtr. No. J-2, Saharpura, PO and PS Sindri, Dist. Dhanbad Opposite Parties --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Niranjan Singh & Kaushal Kumar, Advocates For the State : Mr. Abhay Kumar Tewari, APP --------- 10/Dated:16. 09/ 2015 This revision is directed against the order dated 21.11.2014 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court in Maintenance Case no. 162 of 2009 whereby the petitioner was directed to pay the maintenance amount of Rs. 15,000/- per month to the opposite party-wife.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has assailed the impugned order and submitted that without assessing the actual income of the petition...
Puranmal Agrawal and Ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-15-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 804 of 2012 With I.A. No. 4928 of 2015 ------- 1. Puranmal Agrawal 2. Bimal Kumar Agrawal 3. Navin Kumar Agrawal . Petitioners -Versus- 1. State of Jharkhand 2. Om Prakash Jaggi ..... Opposite Parties ------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------- For the Petitioners : : M/s. Kaustav Panda, Nagmani Tiwari, Ranjan Kumar. For the State : : M/s. K.K. Singh, A.P.P. For the Opposite Party No. 2 : : M/s. Arun Kumar Pandey. ------- C.A.V. on 03.09.2015 Pronounced on 15.09.2015 ORDER H.C. Mishra, J.: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State as also learned counsel for the complainant opposite party No.2. 2. The petitioners have prayed for quashing the order dated 18.04.2011 passed by Smt. K.M. Prasad, learned Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur, in C/1 Case No. 660 of 2011, whereby the Court below has found prima facie offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, (hereinafter referr...
Dr Ranjit Kumar Alias Ranjit Kr and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkhand and ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-15-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 953 of 2014 With I.A. No. 4031 of 2014 With I.A. No. 4949 of 2014 With I.A. No. 995 of 2015 With I.A. No. 5224 of 2015 ------- 1. Dr. Ranjit Kumar @ Ranjit Kr.2. Sanjay Kumar Srivastava 3. Munna @ Shivjee Sinha 4. Ranjeet @ Ranjeet Kumar . Petitioners -Versus- 1. State of Jharkhand 2. Moti Rani ..... Opposite Parties ------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------- For the Petitioners : : M/s. Indrajit Sinha For the State : : M/s. Shree Prakash Jha, A.P.P. For the Opposite Party No. 2 : : M/s. Mukesh Kumar ------- 06/ 15.09.2015. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State as also learned counsel for the complainant opposite party No.2.2. The petitioners have prayed for quashing the order dated 22.02.2013 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bokaro, in C.P. Case No. 1119 of 2012, whereby cognizance was taken by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate and the complaint case was transf...
Sukra Oran Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-15-2015
Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 508 of 2005 (Against the judgment of conviction dated 22.07.2004 and order of sentence dated 23.07.2004 passed by learned Addl. Judicial Commissioner, Fast Track Court No.IV, Ranchi, in Session Trial No.12 of 2003) Sukra Oraon, son of late Biga Oraon, resident of Village Chund, P.S. Mandar, District Ranchi. Appellant Versus State of Jharkhand ... ... Respondent ------ For the Appellant : Mr. Akhouri Anjani Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Laxmi Murmu, A.P.P. ------ PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R. PRASAD HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK By Court: The appellant, was put on trial, on the accusation of committing murder of one Biga Oraon. The trial court, having found the appellant guilty for the said charge, convicted him for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code vide its judgment dated 22.07.2004 and sentenced him accordingly, vide its order dated 23.07.2004 to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life for the offence under Section 3...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »