Jharkhand Court September 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nilima Tirkey Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-18-2015
W.P.(S) No. 1678 of 2011 --- In the matter of an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India Nilima Tirkey --- --- ---- Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Director General of Police, Government of Jharkhand 3. Inspector General, Jharkhand Armed Police, Jharkhand 4. Deputy Inspector General, Jharkhand Armed Police, Jharkhand 5. Commandant, Jharkhand Armed Police-10, Mahila Battalion, Ranchi --- --- --- Respondents --- For the Petitioner: Dr. S.N. Pathak, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Birju Thakur, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Mohan Kr. Dubey, Advocate --- Present The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh --- By Court: Heard counsel for the parties.2. Petitioner has suffered punishment of withholding of increments for six months equivalent to one black mark and withholding of salary for the period of absence from 20.03.2008 to 26.03.2008 and again from 03.04.2008 to 07.04.2008 imposed by the Commandant, Jharkhand Armed Police Force-10 (Female Battalion) vide impugned...
Laldhar Sahu and Ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-18-2015
Cr.M.P. No.688 of 2007 [An application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C.] 1. Laldhar Sahu 2. Kalindar Sahu 3. Sudha Devi 4. Dr. Shyam Narayan Sahu 5. Smt. Bulangi Sahu 6. Basand Prasad Sahu ..... Petitioners -Versus- 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. Nandita Sahu . Opposite Parties For the Petitioners : Mr. P.P.N. Roy, Sr. Advocate : Mr. Mohit Kumar, Advocate Mrs. Vani Kumari, Advocate For the State : APP For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. B.M. Tripathy, Sr. Advocate Mr. B.K. Mishra, Advocate PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA ---- By Court: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State as also learned counsel for the complainant O.P. No.2.2. Petitioners have prayed for quashing the order dated 19.2.2007 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lohardaga, in Lohardaga P.S. Case No.199 of 2005, corresponding to G.R. No.466 of 2005, whereby the cognizance has been taken against the petitioners for the offence under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code, and Secti...
Orissa Manganese and Minerals Limited Through Its Executive Director S ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2015
1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ---- W.P.(C) No. 3768 of 2015 ------ M/s Tata Steel Limited, an existing Company under previous Company Law, through Mrs. MeenaLall wife of Shri BehariLall, working as Chief-Legal & Compliance, having registered office at 24, Homi Modi Street, P.O. Fort, Police Station Fort, Town & District Mumbai, Maharashtra and having its Steel Plant and Office at Jamshedpur, P.O. and PS Bistupur, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum .... .. ... Petitioner -Versus- 1.Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Mines, Shastri Bhawan, PO and PS Parliament Street, New Delhi (NCT of Delhi) 2.The State of Jharkhand through its Secretary, Department of Mines & Geology, Nepal House, PO and PS Doranda, Ranchi, 3.Deputy Commissioner, having its office at Chaibasa, PO and PS Chaibasa, District West Singhbhum, 4.Joint Secretary, Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Nepal House, PO and PS Doranda, District Ranchi, 5.The ...
Mukesh Kumar Agarwal and Anr Vs. The Central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3025 of 2015 1. Mukesh Kumar Agarwal 2. Digvijay Singh @ Digvijay Kumar Singh .... Petitioners Versus The Central Bureau of Investigation Opposite Party --- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioners : Mr. R. S. Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate & Mr. Kumar Sundaram, Advocate For the C.B.I. : Mr. Kailash Prasad Deo, Advocate --- Order No. 07 Dated 17th September , 2015 Heard R. S. Mazumdar, learned senior counsel, appearing for the petitioner, Mr. Kailash Prasad Deo, learned counsel for the C.B.I. Petitioners have prayed for grant of anticipatory bail, as they are apprehending their arrest in connection with R.C. Case No. 12(S)/2012-R registered for the offences punishable u/s 120B r/w Sections 420, 468 and 471, pending before the Court of learned Special Judicial Magistrate, C.B.I., Ranchi. The allegations which have been mentioned in the F.I.R. indicates that the petitioners' company was engaged in manufacturing of ...
Mukund Mahto Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Appeal (D.B.) No. 249 of 2014 Against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 11.02.2004 passed by 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Bermo at Tenughat, in Sessions Trial No.136/2000 ----- Mukund Mahto, son of Basant Mahto, resident of Village - Singhpur, PO & P.S. Kashmar, District - Bokaro (Jharkhand) -- Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand --- Respondent ------ PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIRENDER SINGH, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.P.BHATT ----- For the Appellant : Mr. Amresh Kumar For the Respondent-State : Mr. Shekhar Sinha, A.P.P. ------ Dated :17. h September, 2015 Per Virender Singh,C.J.(Oral) Appellant, Mukund Mahto, (hereinafter to be referred to as accused) has preferred the instant appeal through Jharkhand State Legal Services Authority. He is stated to be in custody for the last 15 years 7 months and few odd days, therefore, preference has been given to the instant appeal over and above other appeals ...
Ms Tata Steel Limited Through Mrs Meenalall Vs. Union of India Through ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2015
1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ---- W.P.(C) No. 3768 of 2015 ------ M/s Tata Steel Limited, an existing Company under previous Company Law, through Mrs. MeenaLall wife of Shri BehariLall, working as Chief-Legal & Compliance, having registered office at 24, Homi Modi Street, P.O. Fort, Police Station Fort, Town & District Mumbai, Maharashtra and having its Steel Plant and Office at Jamshedpur, P.O. and PS Bistupur, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum .... .. ... Petitioner -Versus- 1.Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Mines, Shastri Bhawan, PO and PS Parliament Street, New Delhi (NCT of Delhi) 2.The State of Jharkhand through its Secretary, Department of Mines & Geology, Nepal House, PO and PS Doranda, Ranchi, 3.Deputy Commissioner, having its office at Chaibasa, PO and PS Chaibasa, District West Singhbhum, 4.Joint Secretary, Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Nepal House, PO and PS Doranda, District Ranchi, 5.The ...
Deepak Kumar Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(Cr.) No. 317 of 2014 Deepak Kumar Son of Shambhu Saran Prasad, resident of village- Ram Nagar Colony, Chas, PO &PS Chas, District- Bokaro . Petitioner(s) -V e r s u s- 1. State of Jharkhand 2. Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division, Ramgarh, Dist.- Ramgarh . ... Respondents CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI NATH VERMA For the Petitioner(s) : - Mr. Shekhar Prasad Sinha, Advocate For the State : - Mr. Pran Pranay, J.C. to SC II C.A.V. ON- 13/07/2015 PRONOUNCED ON-17/09/2015 Invoking the extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for a direction to Divisional Forest Officer, Forest Division, Ramgarh- respondent no.2 to release his truck bearing registration no. JH-10V-8551 seized in connection with Confiscation Case No. 51 of 2013 arising out of Gola P.S. Case No. 08 of 2013 for the alleged offence under Section 414 of I.P.C. and also under Section 30(ii) of Coal Min...
Mahesh Soni Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2015
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 310 OF2007(In the matter of an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973). ----- Mahesh Soni ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite party ------- For the Petitioner : M/s. Mohit Praksh & Vani Kumari, Advocates For the State : Mr. Mukesh Kumar, A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. P.K. Mukhopadhyay, Advocate ------ PRESENT : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ----- BY COURT:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State as also learned counsel for the informant.2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 9.2.2007 passed by learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Gumla, in Gumla P.S. Case No. 79 of 2005 corresponding to G.R. No. 219 of 2005, whereby charge was framed against the petitioner for the offence under Sections 406, 420, 467 and 120-B of the Indian Penal code and Section 3(ii)(vi) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act (hereinafter referred to as the...
Arun Prakash Mandal Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 4770 of 2012 Arun Prakash Mandal, son of Late Rajendra Pd. Mandal, resident of Village Kumirdaha, P.O. Kumirdaha, P.S. Ranishwar, District Dumka (Jharkhand) .... Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand.2. The State Project Director, Jharkhand Education Project Council, New Co-Operative Building, Shyamaly Colony, Doranda, P.O. + P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi, Jharkhand.3. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, Jharkhand Education Project Godda, P.O. + P.S. + District Godda Jharkhand.4. The District Superintendent of Education-cum-District Programme Officer, Godda, P.O.+P.S.+District Godda, Jharkhand.5. The District Level Selection Committee, Godda, P.O. + P.S. + District Godda.6. The Block Education Extension Officer, Basantrai P.O. + P.S. Basantrai, District Godda. .... Respondents --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Purnendu Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Respondent-State : Ms. Rakhi Rani...
Faguni Devi and Ors Vs. Reli Mahto and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-16-2015
1 S.A. No.46 of 2002 [Against the judgment dated 19th February, 2002 and decree dated 7th March, 2002 passed by 3rd Additioinal District Judge, Hazaribagh in Title Appeal No.51 of 1994] ----- 1. Faguni Devi.2. (a) Damar Lal Mahto. (b) Bajo Devi.3. Gobardh Mahto @ Gobardha Mahto.4. (a) Damar Lal Mahto. (b) Rajni Devi. . Appellants. -Versus- 1. Reli Mahto.2. Runwa Devi.3. Chanu Mahto.4. (a) Bhola Mahto. (b) Bhalan Mahto.5. Jagdish Mahto.6. Bhauna Mahto.7. Bhago Mahto.8. Sukhwa Devi.9. Sita Ram Mahto. 10.Jashwa Devi. 11.Rajwa Devi. 12.Godwa Devi. 13.Laldhari Mahto. 14.Sarkhu Mahto. 15.Most Dharami. 16.Ramlal Mahto. 17.Baso Mahto. 18.Rasho Mahto. 19.Parmeshwar Mahto. 20.Guda Mahto. 21.Daulat Mahto. 22.Sukhdeo Mahto. 23.Budhan Mahto. 24.Batai Mahto. 25.Gobardhan Mahto. 26.Ram Dayal Mahto. 27.Sohri Devi. 28.Gena Mahto. 29.Hari Charan Mahto. 30.Ramdeo Mahto. 31.Dhaneshwar Mahto. 32.Charku Mahto. 33.Bilash Devi. 34.Tilso Devi. 35.Ganeshi Devi. ....Respondents. ----- For the Appellants : Mr. Ra...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »