Jharkhand Court September 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Nanhku Ganjhu Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-02-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(Cr.) No. 272 of 2015 Nanhku Ganjhu, Son of Sahdeo Ganjhu, resident of village Bajamari, PS Chandwa, PO- Nindra, District- Latehar . Petitioner --Versus-- State of Jharkhand . . Respondent For the petitioners : M/s. M.K. Sinha & Amit Sinha, Advocates For the State : Mr. Abhay Kumar Mishra, S.C.III CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI NATH VERMA ----------- C.A.V. ON:06. 08/2015 PRONOUNCED ON:02. 09/2015 The petitioner by invoking the extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has questioned the legality of the order dated 31.01.2015, 20.02.2015 and 17.04.2015 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Latehar whereby and whereunder the warrant of arrest, the proclamation and Process for attachment of property have been issued against the petitioner under Sections 73, 82 and 83 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short the Code) respectively in connection with G.R. Case No. 802 of 2014 arisin...
Anil Kumar Yadav Alias Kallu Yadav and Anr Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-02-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (Cr.) No. 303 of 2015 1. Anil Kumar Yadav @ Kallu Yadav @ Anil Kumar, son of Ram Awadh Singh 2. Rajesh Yadav @ Matku Yadav, son of Chhedi Yadav Both residents of near Ara Gate, PO Mahilong, PS Tatisilway, District- Ranchi . Petitioner(s) -V e r s u s- State of Jharkhand . ... Opposite Party CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI NATH VERMA For the Petitioner(s) : - M/s. Rajesh Kumar & Satish Kumar Keshri, Advocates For the State : - Mr. Ram Nivas Roy, G.P.III CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI NATH VERMA ----------- C.A.V. ON:28. 08/2015 PRONOUNCED ON:02. 09/2015 The petitioners by invoking the extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has questioned the legality of the orders dated 20.05.2015 and 18.06.2015 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi whereby and whereunder the warrant of arrest and Proclamation have been issued against the petitioners under Sections 73 and 82 of Code of Criminal Procedur...
Rajesh Mehta Alias Rajen Mehta Vs. State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-02-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(Cr.) No. 298 of 2015 Rajesh Mehta @ Rajen Mehta, Son of Bindeshwar Mehta, resident of Pandwa, PO & PS- Pandwa, District- Palamau . . Petitioner --Versus-- 1. State of Jharkhand 2. Superintendent of Police, Palamau, PO & PS Medininagar, District- Palamau . . Respondents For the petitioner : M/s. Ritu Kumar & Niki Sinha, Advocates For the State : Mr. Pran Pranay, J.C. to S.C.II CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI NATH VERMA ----------- C.A.V. ON:28. 08/2015 PRONOUNCED ON:02. 09/2015 Invoking the extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has questioned the legality of the order dated 20.03.2015 and 16.06.2015 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Daltonganj whereby and whereunder the proclamation and Process for attachment of property have been issued against the petitioner under Sections 82 and 83 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short the Code) respectively in connection wit...
Radheshyam Singh and Ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-02-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 2117 of 2008 --- 1. Radheshyam Singh 2. Ajeet Mishra 3. Jay Narayan Prasad Mahto 4. Naheshwar Prasad Mehta 5. Ram Prakash Ram 6. Govind Prasad 7. Kameshwar Sao 8. Ram Prawesh Singh 9. Tuleshwar Pd. Mehta 10. Basant Kr. Sharma 11. Akhilesh Kr. Singh --- --- ---- Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Home Department, Govt. of Jharkhand 2. The Director General of Police, Jharkhand 3. The Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh 4. The Superintendent of Police, Koderma --- --- --- Respondents --- CORAM: The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitioners: Dr. S.N. Pathak, Sr. Advocate, Diwakar Upadhyay, Advocate For the Resp-State: Mr. Mohan Kr. Dubey, JC to AG --- 18/ 02.09.2015 Heard counsel for the parties.2. It is not in dispute that the petitioners (except petitioners no. 8, 9 and11) fall in the list of 932 candidates who were identified by the Inquiry Officer as the beneficiaries of malpractices during the sel...
Pratap Textiles Through Its Proprietor Vipin Kumar Gupta Alias Bipin K ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-02-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P(Cr) No. 252 of 2015 Pratap Textiles through its proprietor Vipin Kumar Gupta @ Bipin Kumar . Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & another Respondents Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI NATH VERMA For the petitioner(s) : Mrs Sheela Prasad, Advocate For the respondent State: Addl.P.P. For the respondent No. 2 Mr. M.S. Mittal, Sr. Advocate Date of CAV :20. 8. 2015 Date of pronouncement :02/09/2015 / 02/ 09.2015. Invoking the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the entire criminal proceedings initiated against him in connection with Dhanbad (Bank More) PS Case No. 232 of 2008 registered under sections 420/120B of the Indian Penal Code.2. At the instance of the complainant/ respondent no.2, a complaint was filed in the court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad, which was subsequently referred to the concerned Police Station under section 156...
Photo Devi Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-02-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P No. 990 of 2008 With I.A No.1512 of 2010 Photo Devi ... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Binay Kumar Singh ... Opposite Parties -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Vijoy Pratap Singh, Sr. Advocate. Mrs. Rashmi Kumar, Advocate Mr. Ashok Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. For the Opp.Party No.2 : Mr. Dhirendra Kr. Deo, Advocate ------ 6/02.09.2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State, as also learned counsel for the opposite party No.2.2. The petitioner has filed this application for quashing the entire criminal proceeding against her in Sadar P.S Case No. 543 of 2006, corresponding to G.R Case No. 3011 of 2006, including the order dated 04.7.2007 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribagh, taking cognizance for the offence under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioner. The petitioner has a...
Chandra Prakash Pathak Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-02-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 776 of 2006 ------- Chandra Kishore Pathak . Petitioner -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Smt. Kanti Devi W/o Chandra Kishore Pathak 3. Sonu @ Gudia (Minor) ..... Opposite Parties ------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------- For the Petitioner : : M/s. A.K. Kashyap, Sr. Advocate S.N.P. Roy, Advocate For the State : : M/s. Ram Prakash Singh, A.P.P. ------- 06/ 02.09.2015. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The opposite party No. 2 has not appeared in spite of service of notice upon her.2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 07.10.2005 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lohardaga, in Maintenance Case No. 26 of 2002 / T.R. No. 754 of 2005, whereby the petitioner was directed to make the payment of Rs.500/- per month for the maintenance of his wife opposite party No. 2, and also Rs.400/- per month each to both of his daughters born out of the wedlock. The ...
Arjun Modi Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-02-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 27 of 2015 Arjun Modi . Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Putula Devi Opposite Parties Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI NATH VERMA For the petitioner(s) : Mr. Brij Bihari Sinha For the respondent State: Addl.P.P. For the respondent No. 2 Mr. Sanjay Kumar Date of CAV :26. 8. 2015 Date of pronouncement :02. /9/2015 / 02/09.2015. The petitioner in this revision application has challenged the legality of the order dated 5.12.2014 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Bokaro, in M.P. Case No. 91 of 2011 whereby and whereunder the petition filed by the present opposite party no.2 for grant of maintenance under section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short the Code) has been allowed and the petitioner has been directed to pay maintenance of rupees three thousand per month from the date of the impugned order.2. The present opposite party no.2 was the petitioner in the court below and in that capacity, she ...
M/S Akshaya Roll Mills Pvt.Ltd Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Bo
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-02-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 454 of 2010 M/s Akshaya Roll Mills Pvt. Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act having its works at Ramgarh Industrial Area through one of its directors Jai Prakash Saha, S/o late Saukhi Lal Saha, R/o Gol Par, Ramgarh Cantt. PO &PS-Ramgarh, Dist.- Ramgarh ... ... Petitioner Versus 1. Jharkhand State Electricity Board, through its Chairman, Officiating at Engineering Bhawan, HEC Township, PO & PS- Dhurwa, Dist.-Ranchi 2.The Secretary, Jharkhand State Electricity Board,Engineering Bhawan, HEC Township, PO & PS- Dhurwa, Dist.-Ranchi 3.The General Manager-cum-Chief Engineer, Electric Supply Area, Hazaribagh, Jharkhand State Electricity Board, PO, PS & Dist.-Hazaribagh 4. The Electrical Superintending Engineer, Electric Supply Circle, Hazaribagh, Jharkhand State Electricity Board, PO, PS & Dist.-Hazaribagh 5. The Electrical Executive Engineer (C&R), Electric Supply Circle, Hazaribagh, Jharkhand State Electricity Board, PO, PS...
Bhonda Hansda Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-02-2015
1 Cr. (Jail) Appeal (D.B.) No. 1265 of 2004 Against the judgment of conviction dated 24.11.2003 and order of sentence dated 25.11.2003 passed by the Sessions Judge, Dumka (S.P.) in Sessions Case No. 145 of 2002 (T.R. No. 1884 of 2002). Bhonda Hansda -- Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand -- Respondent ----- For the Appellant : Mr.Rajiv Anand, A.C. For the State : Mr. Awanish Shankar, A.P.P. ----- PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R. R. PRASAD HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK By Court :- The appellant was put on trial on the accusation of committing murder of his father, Mistar Hansda. The Court having found the appellant guilty convicted him for the offence punishable under section 302 of The Indian Penal Code vide its judgment dated 24.11.2003 and sentenced him vide its order dated 25.11.2003 to undergo imprisonment for life.2. The case of the prosecution as initially made out in the fardbeyan is that on 12.04.2002 while the informant Pansuri Hembram-P.W.6 was there in her house at 3-4...