Jharkhand Court September 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Raju Kumar Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-04-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 3621 of 2010 ------- Raju Kumar, S/o Late Jamuna Ram, resident of Mohalla-Abbal Mohalla, P.O, P.S and District-Chatra (Jharkhand) ... Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi, Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O & P.S-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi (Jharkhand) 2.The Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O & P.S-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi. 3.The Under Secretary to the Govt., Road Construction Department, Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O & P.S-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi (Jharkhand) 4.The Chief Engineer, Road Construction Department, Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O & P.S-Dhurwa, District-Ranchi (Jharkhand). 5.The Superintending Engineer, Road Construction Department, Road Circle, Hazaribag, P.O & P.S -Hazaribag, District- Hazaribag (Jharkhand). 6.The Deputy Commissioner, Chatra, P.O, P.S and District Chatra (Jharkhand). 7.The ...
Marium Tigga Alias Marium Raha and Ors Vs. Michel Tigga Alias Mikal an ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-04-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ---- Civil Revision No. 11 of 2015 ----- In the matter of application under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure. ----- 1. Marium Tigga @ Marium Raha, W/o Sri Sarju Kumar raha.2. Sanjeev Kumar Raha 3. Sandeep Kumar Raha; both 2 and 3 sons of Sri Sarju Kumar Raha. All residents of village Dibdih P.O. And P.S. Argora, District- Ranchii, Jharkhand. .... Petitioner. -Versus- 1. Michel @ Mikal S/o Late Patras Oraon 2. Sanjay Tigga 3. Ajay Tigga 4. Manoj Tigga 5. Lalit Tigga. All 2 to 5 sons of late Daud Tigga; all residents of village Dibdih, P.O. And P.S. Argora, District-Ranchi. 6.Deputy Commissioner,Ranchi, P.O.P.S. and Dist-Ranchi .... Opp. Parties. ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA ----- For the Petitioner : M/s. Ayush Aditya & Shashank Shekhar,Advocates. For the Opp-parties:M/s.Ajit Kumar, Sr. Advocate & Syed Ramiz Zafar, Advocate. ----- C.A.V. On 26.08.2015 Pronounced on 04.09.2015 ---- Amitav K. Gupta,J: This applicati...
Madhusthali Institute of Teacher Training Through Its Managing Trustee ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-03-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 3977 of 2015 Madhusthali Institute of Teacher Training, through its Managing Trustee, namely, Kishan Kumar Kejriwal, son of Shaym Sundar Kejriwal, an unit of Madhusthali Vidyapeeth Trust having its Trust Office at Laxmi Niketan, 1st Floor, 243, G.T.Road (N), Liluah, P.O & P.S Lilua, District Howrah711204 (West Bengal), resident of Laxmi Niketan, 1st Floor, 243, G.T.Road(N), Liluah, P.O & P.S Lilua, DistrictHowrah711204 (East Bengal) Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand, through the Principal secretary, Higher Education Department, Ranchi 2. Director, Higher Education, Human Resources Development Department, Ranchi 3. Sido Kanhu Murmu University, through its Registrar, Dumka 4. National Council for Teacher Education, Eastern Regional Committee, Bhubaneswar (Orissa) ... ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE ...
Anita Devi Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-03-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI WP(S) No. 4089 of 2014 ---- Anita Devi ... Petitioner -Versus- 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.The Deputy Commissioner, Jamtara 3.The District Development Commissioner, Jamtara 4.The District Welfare Officer, Jamtara 5.The Block Development Officer, Narayanpur, Jamtara 6.The Child Development Programme Officer, Jamtara 7.Baby Devi ... ... Respondents ---- CORAM :HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH ---- For the Petitioner :M/s Ranjan Kumar Singh & K.K.Mishra For the Respondents :JC to GP III ---- 05- 03.09.2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner was selected earlier for the post of Sevika in an Aam Sabha held for the Centre Mirga Mandal Tola on 11.7.2011 but being the sole candidate that was objected by one Baby Devi, who had been selected in the previous Aam Sabha. There was a dispute relating to the beneficiary area of the centre. The matter was further inquired into on the directions of the deputy Commissioner and the Deputy ...
Manoj Yadav Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-03-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 7409 of 2011 1. MANOJ YADAV, SON OF LATE CHAITRAM YADAV.2. MANOHAR KUMAR YADAV.3. MANJAY KUMAR YADAV, BOTH SONS OF SRI BALGIR RAI.4. KISHUN YADAV.5. JHABAL YADAV, BOTH SONS OF LATE KESHARI YADAV.6. KANHAIYA YADAV, SON OF LATE LAL BAHADUR YADAV.7. GOPAL PRASAD, SON OF LATE RAM PRASAD.8. SHIVJEE YADAV, SON OF LATE CHAITRAM YADAV.9. BIRENDRA SINGH YADAV, SON OF LATE CHAITRAM YADAV.10. VINOD YADAV, SON OF LATE CHAITRAM YADAV.11. SUDARSHAN YADAV.12. GHARBASAN YADAV, BOTH SONS OF LATE LAL MOHAR YADAV.13. HARE RAM YADAV.14. SHANKER YADAV, BOTH SON OF LATE BAL MUNNI YADAV.15. AWADHESH YADAV.16. VIJAY YADAV, BOTH SON OF LATE BYAS YADAV.17. BHUNESHWAR YADAV, SON OF LATE BHUDHAN YADAV.18. MANNA RAM, SON OF LATE RAMESHWAR RAM.19. JAGNARAYAN YADAV.20. JAGDISH YADAV, BOTH SON OF LATE MANGARU YADAV.21. SAHAJ YADAV, SON OF LATE BHUTAN YADAV.22. MANGAL YADAV, SON OF LATE KAILASH YADAV.23. BIJENDRA YADAV, SON OF SRIRAM YADAV.24. MUKTESHWAR YADAV, SO...
Rabi Kumar and Anr Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-03-2015
1 Cr.Appeal (DB) No.88 of 2015 ------- [Against the judgment of conviction and order of sen- tence dated 21st January, 2015, and 22nd January, 2015, respectively, passed by Sri Girish Chandra Sinha, learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Seraikella, in Sessions Trial No.173 of 2011] ---- 1. Rabi Kumar, son of late Shravan Kumar, resident of Village -Urmal, P.O. & P.S. Chauka, District -Seraikella-Kharsawan.2. Duryodhan Gope @ Manjhla Gope, son of Sohan Gope, resident of Karandih, PO&PS- Ichagarh, District -Seraikella-Kharsawan ........... Appellants -Versus- The State of Jharkhand .......... . Respondent ------ For the Appellant : M/s Kaushik Sarkhel, Advocate P.A.S. Pati, Advocate, Tarun Kumar Mahto, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, APP ------ PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIRENDER SINGH, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT ------ Dated, the 03rd September, 2015 Per Virender Singh, C.J.(Oral):1. Since the instant appeal has arisen from the conviction suffered by both t...
Mainak Roy Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-03-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ---- Cr. Revision NO.1185 of 2014 ------ Mainak Roy, S/o Sri Nirmal Roy, r/o 16/1, Gour Mondal Road, Asansol-1, Hottan Road,P.O.P.S Asansol, Dist-Burdwan(W.B.). ... Petitioner. Versus 1. State of Jharkhand 2. Smt. Supriya Roy, W/o Sri Mainak Roy, Bibhuti Apartment, Lobi Circular Road, P.O.P.S. and Dist-Dhanbad. ......Opp.Parties. ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr.S.K.Laik, Advocate. For the State : APP. For O.P.No.2 : Mr.Rupesh Singh, Advocate. ------ 06/03.09.2015 This application is directed against the order dated 22.09.2014 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Dhanbad in Maintenance Case no.231/2010 whereby the petitioner was directed to pay maintenance to the O.P.-wife @ Rs.8000/- and the minor son @ Rs.3000/- p.m. respectively till he attains the age of majority.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that it would be evident that the maintenance case was filed in ...
Dewanand Nayak Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-03-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 3365 of 2009 ------- Dewanand Nayak, son of Sidra, resident of Village & Post- Chandipur, P.S. - Kasmar, District Bokaro (Jharkhand). ... Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.The Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi. 3.The Director, Sarwa Shiksha Abhiyan, Govt of Jharkhand at Ranchi 4.The Regional Deputy Director of Education, North Chhotanagpur Region at Bokaro (Jharkhand) 5.The Deputy Commissioner-cum-Chairman, Sarwa Shiksha Abhiyan, District-Bokaro, (Jharkhand). 6.The District Superintendent of Education-cum-District Programme Officer, Sarwa Shiksha Abhiyan, Bokaro (Jharkhand). 7.The Block Education Extension Officer Kasmar, P.O & P.S.-Kasmar, Dist-Bokaro (Jharkhand). 8.Ganga Prasad Munda, son of Janki Munda, Secretary, N.P.S Padhiatand, resident of village-Ormo (Padhiatand) P.O-Chandipur, P.S. Kasmar, Dist-Bokaro (Jharkhand) .... Respondents ------ CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRA...
Rathu Mahto Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-03-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 689 of 2014 Rathu Mahto, S/o Late Gokul Mahto, R/o Barora New Colony, P.O- Nawagarh, P.S.-Barora, Dist.-Dhanbad Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. Hemia Devi, W/o Late Gokul Mahto, R/o Barora Basti, P.O-Nawagarh, P.S.-Barora, Dist.-Dhanbad Opposite Parties --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Md. Zaid Ahmed, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Naresh Pd. Thakur, Advocate --------- 06/Dated:03. 09/2015 This revision is directed against the order dated 23.06.2014 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Dhanbad in Maintenance Case No. 336 of 2010, whereby the court below has directed the petitioner to pay maintenance @ Rs. 4,000/- (four thousand) per month to O.P. No.2./wife. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the learned court below has failed to appreciate that under Section 125(1)(d) Cr.P.C, the word used is 'father or...
Birendra Ram Vs. State of Jharkhand and Anr.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-02-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.1450 of 2005 with I.A. No.656 of 2006 Birendra Ram ..... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Niraj Kumar Singh, BDO, Jama, District Dumka . Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioner : Mr. Krishan Murari For the State : A. P.P. ----- 8/02.09.2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Opposite party No.2 has not appeared in spite of service of notice. Even otherwise, he is a State Government Official, who is represented by the learned counsel for the State.2. The petitioner has filed this application for quashing the FIR in Jama P.S. Case No.113 of 2005, corresponding to G.R. No.1309 of 2005, registered for the offence under Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code.3. The FIR shows that the petitioner, at the relevant time, was working as Gram Panchyat Supervisor, Jama, and the FIR has been lodged by the Block Development Officer, Jama, alleging that the petiti...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »