Jharkhand Court August 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Priya Ranjan Bhagat Vs. Pradeep Kumar Bhagat and Ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-31-2015
1 F.A. No.379 of 1991(R) [Against the judgment dated 3rd September, 1991 and decree dated 13th September, 1991 passed by Sub Judge- V, Ranchi in Title (Partition) Suit No.86 of 1988] With F.A. No.95 of 2007 With F.A. No.107 of 2007 [Against the final decree dated 17th March, 2007 passed by Sub Judge-V, Ranchi in Partition Suit No.86 of 1988] ----- 1. Priya Ranjan Bhagat.2. Rakesh Ranjan. . Appellants. [In F.A. No.379/1991(R)] Mukul Bhagat. ........ Appellant. [In F.A. No.95/2007] Saroj Bhagat. ........ Appellant. [In F.A. No.107/2007] -Versus- 1. (a) Saroj Bhagat. (b) Ms Abha Bhagat. (c) Anju Bhagat (d) Ritu Bhagat 2. (a) Asha Bhagat (b) Rahul Bhagat 3. Jayant Bhagat 4. Ashok Bhagat 5. Alok Bhagat 5(a) Ratna Gupta 6. Shanta Bhagat 7. (a) Sunita Bhagat (b) Mukul Bhagat (c) Amitabh Bhagat (d) Abinash Bhagat (e) Sarita Bhagat (Singh) (f) Geeta Bhagat (Ojha) (g) Sweta Bhagat 8. (a) Usha Devi (b) Ratan Deep Bhagat (c) Sanjoy Bhagat 9. Ranjeet Lal Bhagat 10.Smt. Anpurna Bhagat 11.Smt. Shaneh...
Shibu Turi Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-31-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No. 441 of 2012 Shibu Turi ..... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Pramod Kumar Mishra 3. Manoj Kumar Mishra .. Opposite Parties -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Sahani, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. -------- 6/ 31.08.2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 16.9.2011 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Hazaribag, in Criminal Revision No. 98 of 2011, whereby the criminal revision filed by the petitioner against the order dated 24.2.2011 passed by Sri Santosh Kumar No.I, the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Hazaribag, in C. Case No. 16 of 2011 (Trial No. 1183 of 2011) has been dismissed.3. By order dated 24.5.2011 passed in C. Case No. 16 of 2011, the learned Judicial Magistrate had found prima facie offence under Section 323, 341, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code only, aga...
Ms Ankur Biochem Pvt Ltd Through Its Shri Mahendra Sharma Vs. Excise a ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-31-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 7916 of 2013 with I.A. No. 4855 of 2015 Ankur Biochem Pvt. Ltd. . Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. .... Respondents .. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. PATEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RATNAKER BHENGRA .. For the Petitioner : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Ajit Kumar, A.A.G. .. 05/Dated:31. of August, 2015 st Per D.N. Patel, J W.P.(C). No. 7916 of 2013.1. Having heard learned counsel for both the sides and looking to the contentious issues, raised in this writ petition, Rule.2. Mr. Ajit Kumar learned Additional Advocate General, waives notice of Rule on behalf of all the respondents.3. Rule, is made returnable, at the request of learned counsel for both the sides, on 14th September, 2015. I.A. No. 4855 of 2015.4. This interlocutory application has been preferred for getting stay of operation, implementation and execution of the order passed by Assistant Commissioner, Excise, Dhanbad dated 10th August,...
Veena Devi and Ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and Anr.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-31-2015
1 Criminal Misc. Petition No.1099 of 2006 ---- [An application filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Code] --- 1. Veena Devi 2. Kedar Nath Choudhary 3. Smt. Shailbala Kiran ..... Petitioners -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Shrawan Kumar . Opposite Parties For the Petitioners : Mr. P.P.N. Roy, Sr. Advocate For the State : APP PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA ---- By Court: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. The complainant opposite party No.2 has not appeared in spite of publication of the notice in the newspaper, after the efforts of service of notice upon him through ordinary process and registered post, failed.2. Petitioners are aggrieved by the order dated 16.6.2006 passed by Sri S.K. Das, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Giridih, in complaint case No.376 of 2006, corresponding to T.R. No.1283 of 2006, whereby prima facie offence under Sections 498, 379, 497, 323 / 34 of the Indian Penal Code has been f...
Suresh Ram and Anr Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-31-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (S) No. 948 of 2014 .....1. Suresh Ram 2. Sushil Kumar Ravi Petitioners -V e r s u s- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Principal Secretary, Personnel, Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasa Department, Government of Jharkhand 3. The Principal Secretary, Water Resources Development Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 4. The Joint Secretary, Water Resources Development Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 5. Deputy Secretary to Government, Water Resources Development Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 6. Arun Prakash 7. Sanjeev Kumar 8. Shyam Babu Das 9. Bhim Kumar 10. Prabhat Kumar 11. Birendra Kumar 12. Chandra Shekhar 13. Amarendra Kumar ... ... Respondents CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : - M/s V. K. Tiwary, Adv. For the Respondents : - Mr. Kr. Rahul Kamlesh, JC to SC-II ... 06/31.08.2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioners are Assistant Engineer in Water Resourc...
Nesar Khan Alias Mangaru Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-31-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 4314 of 2015 Mangal Laguri ... ... ... ... ... ... Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... ... ... ... Opp. Party. ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY ------ For the Petitioner :Mr. Pravin Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vinay Kumar Tiwary, A.P.P. ------ 03 / 31.08.2015: Heard Mr. Pravin Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Vinay Kumar Tiwary, learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is an accused in connection with Jeteya P.S. Case No. 18 of 2014, corresponding to G.R. No. 619 of 2014 and S.T. No. 06 of 2015, registered for the offence punishable under sections 302 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case due to grudge and enmity and that the petitioner is in custody since 17.10.2014. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that there is spec...
Kishan Mandal and Anr Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-31-2015
1 Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 131 of 2005 (Against the judgment of conviction dated 4.12.2004 and order of sentence dated 6.12.2004 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-II,F.T.C. Jamtara in Sessions Case. No. 99 of 2003/41 of 2003.) ----- 1. Kishan Mondal, son of Late Rajan Mondal.2. Shibu @ Subhash Mondal, son of Late Sanichar Mondal both resident of village Dudhani, P.S. Jamtara, District Jamtara -- Appellants Versus The State of Jharkhand -- Respondent ----- For the Appellants : Mr. Sanjay Prasad & Rajiv Lochan, Adv. For the State : Mrs. Laxmi Murmu, A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Manindra Kumar Sinha & Amit Kumar, Advocates ----- PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R. R. PRASAD HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK By Court :- These two appellants were put on trial on the accusation of kidnapping of one Bhudeo Mondal for the purpose of ransom and then killing him. The Court having found the appellants guilty for the offence punishable under section 364A and convicted the appellants under section ...
Sakib Hassan Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-31-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.S. No. 4003 of 2009 ----------- Sakib Hassan, Son of Hassan Imam, Resident of Friends Colony Pugmil, P.O. Noora, P.S. Sadar, District-Hazaribagh. ..Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand.2. The Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh.3. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Hazaribagh.4. District Superintendent of Education, Hazaribagh. .Respondents ----- Coram: HONBLE MR JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. P.C. Sinha, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Baleshwar Yadav, learned J.C. to S.C. 1 ----- 12/31.08.2015 In this writ application, the petitioner has prayed for a direction upon the respondents to adjust the petitioner on a class III post in stead of a class IV post, in which he is working on compassionate basis.2. The father of the petitioner namely Hassan Imam was a teacher who died while in service on 21.03.2007 and upon the death of his father, the petitioner had made an application for compassionate appointment. ...
Soni Singh Vs. Bimlesh Kumar Singh
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-31-2015
1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ------ F.A. No.46 of 2014 With I.A. No.7805 of 2013 ------ Soni Singh, wife of Shri Bimlesh Kumar Singh, Daughter of Shri Mrityunjay Singh, Resident of Jharnapara, Park Market, Hirapur, Dhanbad PO,PS and District Dhanbad ........... .............Appellant -Versus- Bimlesh Kumar Singh, son of Shri Yugal Kishore Singh, Resident of Chiragora, Samsan Road, PO, PS and District Dhanbad ...........Respondent ------ CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIRENDER SINGH, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT ------ For the Appellant : Mr. Shailesh, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate ------ st 19/ Dated:31. August, 2015 Per Virender Singh, C.J.:1. The matter is listed under the heading for admission. On consent of both the parties the case is admitted and taken up for hearing and final disposal along with I. A. Petition No 7805 of 2013 which is filed by the opposite party /Appellant for stay of the Execution Case No. 3 of 2011.2. Hear...
Bijay Kumar Roy ? Vijay Kumar Rai Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-28-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 1307 of 2006 Bijay Kumar Roy @ Vijay Kumar Rai ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. K.P. Deo, Advocate. Mr. Girish Mohan Singh, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ------ 3/28.08.2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 23.5.2006 passed by the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Madhupur at Deoghar, in GOCR Case No. 38 of 2006 (arising out of Sarath P.S Case No.33 of 2006 corresponding to G.R. No.83 of 2006), whereby, cognizance has been taken against the petitioner for the offence under Sections 182 & 211 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner has also prayed for quashing the entire criminal proceeding against him in the said case.3. From the record, it appears that the petitioner was the informant in Sarath P.S Case No.33 of 2006 ...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »