Skip to content

Jharkhand Court June 2015 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jun 18 2015

Sushila Kumari Vs. Road Construction

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Jun-18-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.4061 of 2013 ------- Sushila Kumari, wife of Anil Kumar Singh, resident of Chatra, P.O. & P.S. & District-Chatra (Jharkhand) Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O.-Dhurwa, P.S.-Hatia, District-Ranchi.2. The Deputy Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O.-Dhurwa, P.S.-Hatia, District-Ranchi.3. The Engineer-in-Chief, Road Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand, Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O.- Dhurwa, P.S.-Hatia, District-Ranchi.4. The Executive Engineer, Road Construction Department, Road Division, Chatra, P.O. & P.S. & District-Chatra. ... Respondents ------ CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK ------ For the Petitioner : Mr Krishna Shankar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mrs Chaitali C. Sinha, J.C. to AAG ------ 05/Da...


Jun 17 2015

Ritbaran Manjhi Alias Libra Manjhi Vs. The State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Jun-17-2015

Criminal (Jail) Appeal (DB) No. 250 of 2014 Against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 30/01/2004, passed by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Bermo at Tenughat in Sessions Trial Nos. 34 of 2000/47 of 2003. Ritbaran Manjhi @ Libra Manjhi @ Libra, S/o Dhono Manjhi @ Dhano Manjhi, R/o Village Arajuiya, Tola Parghuttu. PO & PS- Petarwar, District- Bokaro Appellant Versus State of Jharkhand Respondent For the Appellant : Mr. Pawan Kumar Pathak, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Anand Kr. Pandey, A.P.P. P R E S E N T The Honble Mr. Justice R.R.Prasad The Honble Mr. Justice Pramath Patnaik J U D G M E N T By Court: This appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 30th January, 2004, passed by the 1 st Additional Sessions Judge, Bermo at Tenughat in Sessions Trial Nos. 34 of 2000/47 of 2003, whereby and whereunder the Court having found the appellant Ri...


Jun 17 2015

Rajeev Kumar Bajpai Vs. Education

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Jun-17-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (S) No. 4289 of 2013 ... Rajeev Kumar Bajpai ---- ---- ---- Petitioner -V e r s u s- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Director, Primary Education, Project Building, Ranchi 3. The Regional Education, Deputy Director, Santhal Pargana Division, Dumka 4. The Deputy Commissioner, Godda 5. The District Superintendent of Education - cum- District Programme Officer, Godda 6. The Block Education Extension Officer, Boarijore, Godda 7. The Block Development Officer-cum-President of Block Education Committee, Boarijore, Godda 8. The Head Master, Upgraded Primary School, Baheliyachak, Godda --- --- --- ---- Respondents --- CORAM: The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitioner: Mr. Purnendu Kr. Jha, Advocate For the Respondent-State: JC to GP-II --- 08 17.06.2015 Heard counsel for the parties.2. Order dated 29.04.2014 which recapitulates the grievance of the petitioner, is being quoted hereunder: The grievances of the petitioner is that t...


Jun 17 2015

Shashi Kumar Verma and Ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Jun-17-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P.No. 70 of 2002 1. Shashi Kumar Verma.2. Raj Kumar Prasad.3. Raj Kumar Srivastava.4. Sanjay Kumar Sinha.5. Smt. Sanju Verma.6. Smt. Kiran Sinha.7. Smt. Muni Srivastava. ...Petitioners -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand.2. Smt. Sandhya Rani. ... ...Opp. Parties -------- CORAM: THE HONE'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the Petitioners: Mr. P.S.Dayay, Advocate. For the State: A.P.P. -------- 07/ 17.06.2015 This Cr.M.P. has been filed for quashing the order dated 18.04.2000 passed by Smt. Reeta Mishra, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dhanbad in Complaint Case No. 386/1995 whereby the petitioners have been directed to face trial for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/323 of the Indian Penal Code and accordingly, they were directed to be summoned.2. The facts in brief is that the complainant namely, Smt. Sandhya Rani was married with Ashok Kumar Verma on 15.02.1989 according to Hindu rites and customs. After the marriage she had st...


Jun 17 2015

Manoj Verma Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Jun-17-2015

Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 858 of 2014 Against the judgment and order dated 02.09.2014 respectively passed by the then Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar in F.S.S. Case No. 28/2013-14. Manoj Verma @ Manoj Kumer Verma son of Babulal Verma, Resident of Village and P.O. Rikhiya, P.S. Mohanpur, District Deoghar, Jharkhand. Appellant Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. District Food Safety Officer-cum-Additional Chief Medical Officer, Deoghar, P.O. and P.S. Deoghar, District Deoghar. Respondent ----- For the Appellant : M/s Kailash Prasad Deo & Sudhansu Kumar Deo, Advocates For the State : Mr. Ashok Kumar, A.P.P. ----- PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R. R. PRASAD HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK By Court :- 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 2.9.2014, passed by Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar in F.S.S. Case No. 28/2013-14, whereby and whereunder the court having found the appellant guilty for selling salt of Sub-standard quality and for keeping it in unhygienic condition, co...


Jun 17 2015

Laxman Mandal Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Jun-17-2015

Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 857 of 2014 Against the judgment and order dated 02.09.2014 respectively passed by the then Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar in F.S.S. Case No. 27/2013-14. Laxman Mandal, son of Late Vishwanath Mandal, Resident of Village and P.O. Rikhiya, P.S. Mohanpur, District Deoghar, Jharkhand. Appellant Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. District Food Safety Officer-cum-Additional Chief Medical Officer, Deoghar, P.O. and P.S. Deoghar, District Deoghar. Respondent ----- For the Appellant : M/s Kailash Prasad Deo & Sudhansu Kumar Deo, Advocates For the State : Mr. Ashok Kumar, A.P.P. ----- PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R. R. PRASAD HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK By Court :- 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 2.9.2014, passed by Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar in F.S.S. Case No. 27/2013-14, whereby and whereunder the court having found the appellant guilty for selling salt of Sub-standard quality and for keeping it in unhygienic condition, convicted ...


Jun 16 2015

Umesh Rai Vs. Renu Devi and Anr

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Jun-16-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 260 of 2014 Umesh Rai, Son of Late Suba Rai, resident of village Kosogondodighi, PO-Chatro, PS- Deori, District- Giridih . Petitioner(s) -V e r s u s- 1. Renu Devi, wife of Umesh Rai, daughter of late Beni Rai 2. Rahul Kumar, son of Umesh Rai (minor) through his natural mother and guardian namely Renu Devi Both residents of village and PO- Nawa Ahar, PS Deori, District-Giridih . ... Opposite Parties CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI NATH VERMA For the Petitioner(s) : - Mr. A.K.Sahani, Advocate For the Opp.Parties :- Mr. Vijay Kumar Roy, Advocate CAV on 13.05.2015 Delivered on 16/06/2015 Challenge in this revision application is to the order dated 03.02.2014 passed by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Giridih in Maintenance Case No. 88 of 2010, whereby and whereunder the petitioner has been directed to pay a sum of Rs.2,000/-(two thousand) per month as maintenance to his wife- opposite party no.1 Renu Devi and a sum of Rs.1,000/...


Jun 16 2015

Sita Gope Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Jun-16-2015

Criminal Appeal (S.J.) No. 790 of 2002 ----------- Against the judgment of conviction dated 08.10.2002and order of sentence dated09.10.2002 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.1, Gumla in Sessions Case No.296 of 1998. ----------- Sita Gope, son of Late Mahabir Gope Resident of Village- Ambatoli, Police Station- Raidih, District-Gumla . . . Appellant --Versus-- The State of Jharkhand . . . Respondent For the Appellant : Mr.Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Abhay Kumar Tiwari, A.P.P. PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI NATH VERMA JUDGMENT C.A.V. ON:08. 05/2015 PRONOUNCED ON:16. 06/2015 The sole appellant called in question the legality of the impugned judgment and order of conviction dated 08/09.10.2002 rendered by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.I, Gumla in Sessions Trial No. 296 of 1998 whereby and whereunder the appellant has been convicted under Section 325 of the Indian Penal Code and has been sentenced to undergo rigorous ...


Jun 16 2015

Rajendra D Seth Alias Rajendra Seth Vs. The State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Jun-16-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (Cr.) No. 99 of 2015 ------------ Rajendra D. Seth alias Rajendra Seth, Son of Late Dhuneshwar Seth, Residents of Flat No.34, Monisha Tower, 4, Cross Lane, Lokhandwala Complex, Andheri West, P.O. Azad Nagar, P.S. Oshiwara, Mumbai- 400053 (Maharashtra) ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Respondent ------------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI NATH VERMA For the Petitioner : Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, Advocate Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Abhay Kumar Mishra, S.C. III ------------ C.A.V. ON:14. 05.2015 PRONOUNCED ON:16. 06.2015 The petitioner questions the legality and validity of the order dated 11.04.2013 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi in Namkum P.S. Case No.173 of 2011 whereby proclamation under Section 82 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (in short 'the Code') has been issued against the petitioner without complying the mandate of the said provision.2. To put in short the r...


Jun 16 2015

Atam Thakur and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Jun-16-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 368 of 2014 ------------ 1. Atam Thakur, son of Khakhnu Thakur, resident of Kuanr Bandh, P.S.- Hariharganj, P.O.-Dhulsorua, District- Palamau 2. Prabhu Yadav, son of Washista Yadav, resident of Kuanr Bandh, P.S.- Hariharganj, P.O.-Dhulsorua, District- Palamau 3. Gopal Yadav, son of Khelawan Yadav 4. Parikha Yadav, son of Late Kashi Yadav 5. Kameshwar Yadav, son of Chandra Dev Yadav 6. Uday Yadav, son of Late Naresh Yadav 7. Ram Rup Yadav, son of Late Kashi Yadav Sl. Nos. 3 to 7 are residents of Village- Dhulsorua, P.S.- Hariharganj, P.O.-Dhulsorua, District- Palamau ... ... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Opp. Party ------------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI NATH VERMA For the Petitioners : Mr. Pandey Neeraj Rai, Advocate Mr. Rohit Ranjan Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jai Prakash, A.A.G. Mr. Kaushal Kishore Mishra, A.P.P. ------------ C.A.V. ON:06. 05.2015 PRONOUNCED ON:- 16/06.2015 The petitioners...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial