Jharkhand Court March 2015 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Raj Kishor Kumar Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-12-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 1909 of 2012 ----------- Raj Kishor Kumar, Son of late Sudarshan Baitha, Resident of Village, P.O. & P.S. Karaghar, District-Rohtas ( Sasaram), Bihar, at present Estimtor, D.W. and S. Circle Hazaribagh, P.O. & P.S. Sadar Hazaribagh, District-Hazaribagh. ..Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. .Opposite Party ----- Coram: HONBLE MR JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajeev Kumar, Advocate For the State : APP ----- C.A.V. On 17.12.2014 Pronounced on 12/3/2015 Heard Mr. Rajeev Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. In this application, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the entire criminal proceeding including the order dated 10.07.2012 passed by learned Civil Judge cum Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chatra in Sadar P.S. Case No. 131 of 2009 corresponding to G.R. No. 543 of 200 whereby and whereunder the application filed by the petitioner under section 239 of the Code of...
Gurlal Singh Vs. Shaheen Parveen
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-12-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 5895 of 2012 Gurlal Singh, son of Late Nihal Singh, represented by Kripal Singh, son of Late Buta Singh, by faith Sikh, resident of Holding No. 61, Line No. 3, Kashidih, PO & PS Sakchi, TownJamshedpur, District Singhbhum East Petitioner Versus 1. Shaheen Parveen, daughter of Abdul Quyum Khan, by faith Muslim, by occupation Housewife, resident of Holding No. 21, Road No. 7, Baganshahi, Mango, PO & PS Mango, Town Jamshedpur, District Singhbhum East 2. Udham Singh, son of Late Ajit Singh 3. Inder Singh, son of Late Ajit Singh 4. Harbhajan Kaur, widow of Late Ajit Singh All residents of Holding No. 369, Line No. 12, Kashidih PO +PS Sackhi, Town Jamshedpur, Dist. Singhbhum East ... Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR For the Petitioner : Mr. Vikash Kishore Prasad, Advocate : Mr. Shyam Narsaria, Ad...
Dilip Sen Gupta Vs. State of Jharkhand and Anr.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-12-2015
10 Cr. M. P. No. 786 of 2005 Applications under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Dilip Sen Gupta, son of Sri S. N. Sen Gupta, resident of Telco Colony (Kharkai Road), P.O. & P.S. Golmuri, District East Singhbhum, Jharkhand .......... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sri Umesh Prasad Singh, Labour Superintendent-cum- Inspector, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand . Opposite Parties PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY For the Petitioner : Mr. V. P. Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr. Amit Kr. Das, Advocate Mrs. Rashmi Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shekhar Sinha, A.P.P. C.A.V. on 23.02.2015 Delivered on 12/03/2015 Heard Mr. V. P. Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Shekhar Sinha, learned counsel for the opposite parties. In this application, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the entire criminal proceeding in connection with C/2 Case No. 2219 of 2005 including the order dated 8.6.2005 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistr...
Dilip Kumar Sen Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-12-2015
6 Cr. M. P. No. 788 of 2005 Applications under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 Dilip Sen Gupta, son of Sri S. N. Sen Gupta, resident of Telco Colony (Kharkai Road), P.O. & P.S. Golmuri, District East Singhbhum, Jharkhand .......... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sri Umesh Prasad Singh, Labour Superintendent-cum- Inspector, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand . Opposite Parties PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY For the Petitioner : Mr. V. P. Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr. Amit Kr. Das, Advocate Mrs. Rashmi Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shekhar Sinha, A.P.P. C.A.V. on 23.02.2015 Delivered on 12/03/2015 Heard Mr. V. P. Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Shekhar Sinha, learned counsel for the opposite parties. In this application, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the entire criminal proceeding in connection with C/2 Case No. 2218 of 2005 including the order dated 8.6.2005 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistra...
Employers in Relation to the M Vs. Their Workmen,rep.By the Presi
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-12-2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(L) No. 676 of 2009 Employers in relation to the management of Moonidih Area of M/s Bharat Coking Coal Limited, At & P.O. Moonidih, P.S. Putkee, districtDhanbad, through Sri Rabindra Kumar Nigam, son of Late Ramadhin Nigam, General Manager, Western Jharia Area, M/s B.C.C.L., at present residing at G.M. Bunglow, Moonidih, P.O. Moonidih, P.S. Putekee, Dhanbad ... ... Petitioner Versus Their Workmen, represented by the President, National Colliery Workers Congress, Water Board Colony, Hirapur, Dhanbad ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR For the Petitioner : Mr. Amit Kr. Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Pravin Kr. Rana, Advocate ........ 10/12.03.2015 Aggrieved by award dated 03.11.2008 in Reference No. 130 of 2000 whereby the superannuation of the respondentworkman with effect from 18.12.1998 has been held not justified, the present writ petiti...
Satya Binaik Alias Satya Banaik Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-12-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No. 3038 of 2013 --- Satya Binaik @ Satya Banaik, wife of Late Ashwani Binaik, resident of Harihar Singh Lane, P. O. & P.S. Bariatu, District - Ranchi Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Bimal Kumar Sighania, son of Sri Prahlad Rai Singhania, resident of 403, Satya Enclave, Lake Avenue, P.O & P.S. Gonda, District Ranchi Opp. Parties --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate For the Opp. Party No. 2 : Mr. N. K. Pasari --- C.A.V. on 03/03/2015 Pronounced on 12/03/2015 Heard Mr. Indrajit Sinha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. N. K. Pasari, learned counsel for the opposite party No.2. In this application, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the entire criminal proceedings in connection with Complaint Case No. 1683 of 2013 including the order dated 07.09.2013 passed by Sri S. D. Tripathi, learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, R...
Gunga Banra and Ors Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-12-2015
Cr. Appeal (SJ) No. 474 of 2010 In the matter of an application under Sections 374(2) read with Section 389(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 ..1. Gunga Banra, S/o Sri Sidiu Banra 2. Chari Banra, S/o Sri Singra Banra 3. Bota Banra, S/o Late Chokro Banra 4. Saluka Banra, S/o Kundia Banra 5. Jata Banra, S/o Sri Hari Banra 6. Gobind Banra, S/o Mukru Banra All resident of Village-Baramaudi, PO Chaibasa, PS Muffasil, Dist Singhbhum West Appellants Versus The State of Jharkhand Opp. Parties .. For the Appellants : Mr. R.P. Gupta, Adv. For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Hemant Kumar Shikarwar, APP .. Present HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY .. C.A.V. ON0512.2014 PRONOUNCED ON1203/2015 This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 27.04.2010 and 03.05.2010 respectively passed by Sri R.K. Srivastava, Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C.-V, Chaibasa, West Singhbhum in Sessions Trial no. 26/2008 whereby and whereunder the appellants were convicted fo...
Lakhan Mahto Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-12-2015
Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No. 1025 of 2004 In the matter of an appeal under Section 374 (2) read with Section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Lakhan Mahto, son of Churaman Mahto, resident of Village Gumo, Post Office and Police Station Telaiya, Dist. Koderma Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand Respondent .. For the Appellant : Mr. Birendra Kumar, advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, A.P.P. Present HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY .. C.A.V. ON :14. 11.2014 PRONOUNCED ON:12. /03/2015 This appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 04.06.2004 passed by Shri Ashok Kumar Mishra, Additional District and Sessions Judge( F.T.C.), Koderma in Sessions Trial No. 351 of 1990 whereby and whereunder the appellant has been convicted for the offence punishable under sections 498-A, 201 and 304-B of the Indian Penal Code and has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for seven years under sections 304-B of the Indian Penal Code, rigorous impri...
Ganesh Pujhar and Anr Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-12-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. (Jail) Appeal No. 1048 of 2007 ..1. Ganesh Pujhar 2. Puran Grihi .. . Appellants Versus The State of Jharkhand . .. Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY For the Appellants : Mr. Amit Kumar, (Amicus Curie) For the State : Mr. Mukesh Bihari Lal C. A. V. ON 05.12.2014 PRONOUNCED ON 12.03.2015 This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 28.6.2007 (sentence delivered on 29.6.2007) passed by Shri Ganpati Tiwari, learned 4th Additional Sessions Judge (F.T.C.), Dumka in Sessions Case No. 57/06 / 43/06, whereby and whereunder the appellants have been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code and the appellant no.1 was also convicted for the offence punishable under Section 412 of the Indian Penal Code and both the appellants were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years for the offence punishable under Section 395 of the Indian P...
Shweta Sharma Vs. State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-11-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 1127 of 2004 ----------- Shweta Sharma, D/o Mahendra Sharma @ Billu Sharma of Toongri Ward No. 5 Chaibasa, P.S. Sadar, District-Singhbhum W. ..Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. .Opposite Party ----- Coram: HONBLE MR JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. M.K. Dey, Sr. Advocate For the State : APP ----- C.A.V. On 09.02.2015 Pronounced on 11/3/2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. In this application, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the entire criminal proceeding in connection with Sadar P. S. Case No. 39 of 2004 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 217 of 2004, including the order dated 30.07.2004, passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chaibasa, whereby and whereunder cognizance has been taken for the offence punishable under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code. An FIR was instituted on the fardbeyan of Bijay Kumar Paul, in which it was stated that the...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »