Skip to content

Jharkhand Court February 2014 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Feb 06 2014

Chandrika Ram and Others Vs. the State of Jharkhand and Others

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Feb-06-2014

R. Banumathi, C.J. and R.R. Prasad, J. 1. Challenging the selection and promotion of respondent Nos.4 to 26 as District and Additional Sessions Judges (as against 65% quota), the petitioners, most of whom are seniors to respondent Nos.4 to 26, have filed this writ petition. The petitioners have also challenged the vires of Rules 4(b) and 5 of the Jharkhand Superior Judicial Service (Recruitment, Appointment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 2001 as unconstitutional and also seek for quashing the Notification Nos. 9853 to 9875 dated 08.10.2013 promoting respondent Nos.4 to 26. 2. Facts in brief which led to the filing of this writ petition are as follows:- The petitioners and respondent Nos. 4 to 26 are the Civil Judges (Senior Division) in the Judicial Service of the State of Jharkhand. Recruitment, Appointment and Conditions of Service in respect of Jharkhand Higher Judicial Service is governed by Jharkhand Superior Judicial Service (Recruitment, Appointment and Conditions of Service)...


Feb 03 2014

Mohan Mahto and Others Vs. the Union of India and Others

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Feb-03-2014

1. The present writ petition has been filed challenging order dated 08.03.2011 in O. A. N. 200 of 2009(R) passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench, Circuit Court at Ranchi whereby the Original Application filed by the applicants has been dismissed. 2. The brief facts of the case are that, the petitioner nos. 1 to 5 are exemployees of Coal Mines Labour Welfare Organisation (hereinafter referred to as 'CMLWO'), Government of India and petitioner nos. 6 to 8 are legal heirs/successors of the exemployees of CMLWO. On 30.09.1986, CMLWO was merged in Coal India Limited and its employees were given an option for their absorption in the Coal India Limited. The original applicants were absorbed in Coal India Limited by order dated 01.10.1986. The employees initially employed with CMLWO were entitled for Prorata pensionary benefits for the service rendered by them under the Central Government subject to the minimum qualifying period of service ,that is, 9 years 9 months...


  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial