Jharkhand Court December 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ashok Kumar Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-02-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 2559 of 2008 Ashok Kumar Singh Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand and others Respondents .. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD .. For the Petitioner :M/s. Anil Kumar Sinha,Sr. Advocate, Rahul Kumar,Advocate For the Respondents : S.C.III04Dated:2. December, 2014 nd The petitioner has preferred the instant writ petition challenging the office order as contained in Memo no. 316 dated 2.4.2008 issued under the signature of District Superintendent of Education, Singbhum East at Jamshedpur by which he has been dismissed from service.2. The brief facts of the case as has been pleaded by the writ petitioner is that the petitioner had joined his service on 7.3.1983 as a B.Sc. Trained Science Teacher and after being posted from one place to another he was transferred and posted to Balak Middle School, Jugsalai, Jamshedpur on 19.9.2001 After transfer of the headmistress of the said school the petitioner has been made acting...
State Bank of India Through Its Chief Manager Hr Shri Sridhar Samanta ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-02-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No. 423 of 2014 Kishan Parasrampuria Petitioner/Appellant Versus The Ranchi Municipal Corporation through the Chief Executive Officer & Ors. ... Respondents/Respondents ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRENDER SINGH, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. PATEL ----- For the Appellant: None For the Respondents: Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate ------ 04/Dated :2. d December, 2014 Per Virender Singh, CJ Counsel for the appellant is said to be indisposed and therefore, unable to appear today. As adjournment on this ground is rightly not opposed by Mr. Sinha, learned counsel appearing for the respondents, list again on 10th December, 2014. (Virender Singh, C.J.) s.m. (D. N. Patel, J) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No. 123 of 2014 Central Bank of India through its Chief Manager Sri Ramesh Jha Respondent No.1/Appellant Versus M/s Bhaskar Electricity Company through one of its partners Rajendra Singh & Ors, ... ... ... ...
Chandrajeet Kumar Alias Chandrajeet Paswan Vs. the State of Jharkhand ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-02-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.930 of 2014 Chandrajeet Kumar @ Chandrajeet Paswan ...... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & ors. ..... Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Satish Kumar Keshri For the Respondents : Mr. Vaibhav Kumar, J.C to A.G. 04/02.12.2014 Heard counsel for the parties. The only grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents should regularize his services for the period from 18.10.2005 to 13.8.2008 during which period he was under suspension on account of pendency of a criminal case in which he was acquitted and his suspension was subsequently revoked. It transpires from the Office order dated 18.10.2005 that the petitioner was placed under suspension on his being taken into custody from 28.7.2005 in terms of Rule 99 of the Bihar Service Code now Jharkhand Service Code (Annexure-4). It appears from the judgment rendered by the learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, (Hilsa) Nala...
Arun Kumar Singh Vs. Human Resource Development
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-02-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(PIL) No. 4891 of 2012 Arun Kumar Singh, son of Sri Arjun Singh, President Jharkhand Viklang Manch, office cum resident at Road No. 1, Jhagrubagan, PO. & P.S. Telco, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand831 004 Petitioner Versus 1. State of Jharkhand through its Secretary, Department of Human Resource Development, Ranchi.2. Jharkhand Academic Council, Namkum, Ranchi 3. Ranchi University, Ranchi through Registrar.4. Vinoba Bhave University, Hazaribagh through Registrar.5. Sidhu Kanhu University, Dumka through Registrar 6. Nilamber Pitamber University, Daltonganj through Registrar 7. Kolhan University, Chaibasa through Registrar 8. Jharkhand High Court, through the Registrar, Ranchi 9. Jharkhand Public Service Commission, Ranchi through Secretary 10. Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, Ranchi through Secretary .. ... Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIRENDER SINGH, CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. ...
Maksudan Yadav Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-02-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.97 of 2011 Maksudan Yadav ........................ Petitioner Versus The Union of India & Ors. ........................ Respondents .......... CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD For the petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Tripathi, Advocate For the respondents : Mr. Ashok Singh, CGC ........... 4/02.12.2014 The petitioner, being aggrieved with the order dated 17.3.2004 by which the petitioner has been removed from service, has approached this Court. It has been argued by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has departmentally been proceeded for unauthorised absence from 16.6.2003 to 24.10.2003 i.e. for 131 days and memorandum of charge has been issued. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that during the relevant period the petitioner was seriously ill and due to that reason he could not be able to present himself in the office. The petitioner has tried to satisfy the Enquiry Offic...
Sarita Devi Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-02-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 1219 of 2010 Sarita Devi Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Dy. Commissioner, Deoghar 3. The Dy. Development Commissioner, Deoghar 4. The District Programme Officer, Deoghar 5. The Child Development Project Officer, Deoghar Respondents --------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sudhansu Kumar Deo, Advocate For the Respondents : J.C. to G.P. II -------- 06/Dated:2. d December, 2014 The petitioner being aggrieved with the order dated 15.02.2010 passed by the Deputy Development Commissioner by which her selection as Aanganbari Sewika has been cancelled and also against the order dated 26.02.2010 by which the petitioner was asked to handover the records in favour of one Sahayika, has approached this Court. Brief facts as has been argued on behalf of the petitioner is that the petitioner was appointed as Sewika of Aanganbari Kendra, Guniasol-2, (Pujhartola), Deoghar, by Aa...
Smt Shakuntala Patodia Vs. State of Jharkhand and Others
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-01-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 6878 of 2012 Smt. Shakuntala Patodia ... Petitioner Versus 1. State of Jharkhand 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi 3. The SubDivisional Officer, Sadar, Ranchi 4. The Deputy Collector Land Revenue, Ranchi 5. Circle Officer, Namkum, Ranchi ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR For the Petitioner : Mr. P.P.N. Roy, Sr. Advocate Mrs. Pragati Prasad, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ashutosh Kr. Singh, J.C. to S.C. (Mines) 07/01.12.2014 Seeking quashing of order dated 04.11.2011 in Misc. Appeal No. 135 R 15/200203 and quashing of order dated 26.05.1998/28.05.1998 in Case No. 3 R 8/199697, the petitioner has approached this Court. 2. The brief facts of the case are that, by a registered deed of sale dated 16.01.1982, the petitioner purchased land comprised in Revisional Survey Plot No. 2196 appertaining ...
Saheb Lal Murmu and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-01-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Rev. No.973 of 2014 With I.A. No.6125 of 2014 With I.A. No.6088 of 2014 1. Saheb Lal Murmu 2. Tulsi Murmu 3. Smt. Holodi Mejhain 4. Pares Murmu 5. Smt. Narosi Mejhain 6. Shiv Lal Majhi . Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sukarmani Manjhiain .... Opposite Parties --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA --------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Kaushik Sarkhel, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Tarun Kumar Mahto, Advocate --------- 04/Dated:01. t December, 2014 This Criminal Revision Application has been preferred against the judgment and order of conviction dated 20.06.2004 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Dhanbad in Cr. Appeal No.313 of 2003, whereby the learned Sessions Judge has partly allowed the appeal of the petitioners by acquitting them from the charge of Section 4 of the Dowry of Prohibition Act while upholding the conviction under Section 498A of the IPC and sentence of R.I. for 2 year...
Ram Prakash Jha and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-01-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 7893 of 2006 1. Ram Prakash Jha 2. Bhubneshwar Sahu .. Petitioners Versus The Union of India & Others .. Respondents ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD ----- For the Petitioners - Mr. Manoj Tandon For the Respondents - Mr. Prabhash Kumar, C.G.C ----- 8/1.12.2014 In this writ petition, the petitioners have challenged the order dated 19.1.2006, by which they have been terminated from service. Against the said order, the petitioners had preferred appeal before the appellate authority, but the same has also been rejected by order dated 12.5.2006. The brief facts, as has been argued on behalf of the petitioners, is that the petitioners had been appointed as constables under the Central Reserved Police Force in terms of an advertisement after following due procedures on 27.5.2003 and 31.3.2003 respectively. After being appointed, the petitioners had started discharging their duties. Pursuant to the reports submitted by th...
Dilip Kumar Routh Vs. Union of India and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-01-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 3930 of 2009 Dilip Kumar Routh Petitioner Versus Union of India through its Joint Secretary, Insurance Division, Jeevan Deep Building, New Delhi & Others Respondents --------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. D.K. Chakraverty, Advocate For the Respondents : M/s Sachin Kumar & Pawan Kumar, Advocates -------- 12/Dated:1. t December, 2014 The petitioner has approached this Court for issuance of writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding upon respondent no. 1 to forthwith reinstate the petitioner in the post of Sepoy who had been terminated on the ground of producing forged caste certificate at the time of appointment. He has filed a writ petition on the ground that criminal case was initiated against the similarly situated persons who have been acquitted by the competent Court of jurisdiction vide judgment dated 14 th February, 2008. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›